2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Naval Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-08-2007, 22:57 PM   #1 (permalink)
urmomma158
the real plastic
Senior Contributor
 
urmomma158's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-05-06
Location: NJ Turnpike
Posts: 937
Country:
Diesel Sub Propulsion Question

I understand that the motors on diesel sub are AC induction and the generator produces Dc current and the sub needs inverters to convert it from DC to AC power to drive the motor. AC to DC conversion is pretty quiet and all you hear is a buzz noise( think tube lights). And a DC to AC converter is much noisier (things you plug into the cigarrete lighter in your car so you can play videogame s, plug in your radio,hairdryer, etc).

I want to know if a large DC to AC inverter shielded with the amount of sound insulating foam an SSK would use noise level will approach that of a turbine's with the amount of sound insulating foam around it an SSN will use ?

Any ideas?
__________________
urmomma158 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2007, 05:03 AM   #2 (permalink)
pdf27
Contributor
 
pdf27's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-05-06
Location: UK
Posts: 538
Country:
Finger-breaking territory methinks!
__________________
Rule 1: Never trust a Frenchman
Rule 2: Treat all members of the press as French
pdf27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2007, 06:17 AM   #3 (permalink)
subba
Patron
 
Join Date: 01-10-07
Posts: 282
While converting AC to DC requires rectifiers which are silent, DC to AC conversions would require a transformer. Which produce a high frequency noise. Shielding the transformer should be good enough. I think high frequency noise emanated in the transformer in a submarine should not travel long distances. OTOH turbines though operating at high speeds will produce low freq noise which will travel much farther distances and much harder to attenuate.

So IMO the DC to AC conversion via a transformer, producing HF noise should be more silent than a turbine ship. I'm just using basic principles here sir, i could be wrong though if i missed out something.
subba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2007, 14:22 PM   #4 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by subba View Post
...DC to AC conversions would require a transformer.
Transformers are for stepping AC voltage up or down or inducing energy from one circuit to another. Converting DC to AC requires an inverter.
__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar...

Last edited by highsea : 02-09-2007 at 14:28 PM.
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2007, 19:18 PM   #5 (permalink)
urmomma158
the real plastic
Senior Contributor
 
urmomma158's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-05-06
Location: NJ Turnpike
Posts: 937
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by subba View Post
While converting AC to DC requires rectifiers which are silent, DC to AC conversions would require a transformer. Which produce a high frequency noise. Shielding the transformer should be good enough. I think high frequency noise emanated in the transformer in a submarine should not travel long distances. OTOH turbines though operating at high speeds will produce low freq noise which will travel much farther distances and much harder to attenuate.

So IMO the DC to AC conversion via a transformer, producing HF noise should be more silent than a turbine ship. I'm just using basic principles here sir, i could be wrong though if i missed out something.
Well the SSN has more space=more foam, and will obviously have a different type of foam for the turbine not to mention other quieting techniques.

One advanatge SSN's have is their pumpjet propulsors which are much quieter than any conventional propellors so in propulsion noise the SSN has the advanatge.
However quieting isn't everything for a sub you still need other things which an SSN clealry has the advanatge in.
urmomma158 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2007, 21:12 PM   #6 (permalink)
pdf27
Contributor
 
pdf27's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-05-06
Location: UK
Posts: 538
Country:
Only some SSNs have pump-jet propulsors, and that isn't limited to SSNs - it's a straight replacement for a prop.
pdf27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2007, 22:22 PM   #7 (permalink)
Francois
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 08-18-05
Posts: 129
False "pdf" (and I don't like you signature, very immature).
Pump-jet needs a lot of energy, that makes it irrelevant for diesel-electrics.

Boycott british food should I say? Poah!
Francois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2007, 05:47 AM   #8 (permalink)
subba
Patron
 
Join Date: 01-10-07
Posts: 282
Quote:
Transformers are for stepping AC voltage up or down or inducing energy from one circuit to another. Converting DC to AC requires an inverter.
Highsea sir, you are correct. But wrt the noise component, i mentioned the transformer as it will be a part of the inverter. Rest of the components of the inverter will produce maybe heat but not noise. Thats why i mentioned the transformer only.
subba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2007, 07:45 AM   #9 (permalink)
pdf27
Contributor
 
pdf27's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-05-06
Location: UK
Posts: 538
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Francois View Post
False "pdf" (and I don't like you signature, very immature).
So grow a sense of humour then and stop taking yourself so seriously. FFS!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Francois View Post
Pump-jet needs a lot of energy, that makes it irrelevant for diesel-electrics.
Unclear - plenty of references saying so, but in theory efficiency should be higher as there is reduced swirl in the water leaving the prop.
And there are some conventional designs using it - for example the BMT Marine SSGT design - linky: New High Mobility Submarine
pdf27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2007, 08:30 AM   #10 (permalink)
Francois
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 08-18-05
Posts: 129
Your no-respect and arrogance has killed what could have been a debate.
Bye.
Francois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2007, 17:27 PM   #11 (permalink)
urmomma158
the real plastic
Senior Contributor
 
urmomma158's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-05-06
Location: NJ Turnpike
Posts: 937
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdf27 View Post
Only some SSNs have pump-jet propulsors, and that isn't limited to SSNs - it's a straight replacement for a prop.
All of the US's top SSN's have it (Seawolf and Virginia)
and Pumpjet propulsors are very heavy, no SSK has one.
urmomma158 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2007, 23:51 PM   #12 (permalink)
ArmchairGeneral
Devil's Advocate
Senior Contributor
 
ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: The boonies of NC, USA.
Posts: 2,746
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by urmomma158 View Post
All of the US's top SSN's have it (Seawolf and Virginia)
and Pumpjet propulsors are very heavy, no SSK has one.
Read pdf's link.
__________________
"Apocalyptic thought is curiously pleasurable."
-Theodore Dalrymple
ArmchairGeneral is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007, 05:58 AM   #13 (permalink)
pdf27
Contributor
 
pdf27's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-05-06
Location: UK
Posts: 538
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmchairGeneral View Post
Read pdf's link.
It isn't something that has actually been built yet and the power source is gas turbines rather than diesels, but BMT marine are really very good at what they do and wouldn't release a drawing like that if it wasn't possible. The UK CVF carrier design is pretty much all their work.

I suspect what is going on will be that pump jet units are more expensive and suffer greater fouling problems, but give major signature reduction at higher speeds. At low speeds, they probably won't make much or any difference.
SSNs and the SSGT I linked to are designed to transit at high speed, while SSKs very rarely go fast. Hence the lack of diesel-electric subs using them.
pdf27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2007, 14:48 PM   #14 (permalink)
ArmchairGeneral
Devil's Advocate
Senior Contributor
 
ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: The boonies of NC, USA.
Posts: 2,746
Country:
Makes sense.
ArmchairGeneral is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2007, 07:03 AM   #15 (permalink)
IflareR
New Member
 
Join Date: 12-10-06
Posts: 9
why would the current need ac-dc-ac conversion? why not use ac generators and ac motors for propulsion?
IflareR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Debate about China, india and US economies, by Businessweek oneman28 Political Discussions 7 11-28-2007 08:43 AM
Ninth-grader punished for asking M.Durant sensitive question Lunatock Current Affairs 105 11-08-2005 20:05 PM
Diesel vs Nuke rickusn Naval Forces 1 03-24-2005 17:57 PM
Troops Put Tough Questions to Rumsfeld war2004 The War in Iraq 90 12-15-2004 12:14 PM
More proof of the Saddam al Qaeda Connection Leader International Defense Topics 3 05-31-2004 21:22 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:17 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8