![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Arleigh Burke Class Questions...
Was wondering if any of the extremely knowledgeable fellows on this board could help with a couple of questions I can't find definitive answer to about the Burkes.
1) Do the Burkes have a "standard" missile load out, i.e how many Standards, Toms etc do they carry - or does it vary widely? i read one source that stated 56 Toms per hull, which seemed extremely high. 2) Is RAM going to replace the Phalanx CIWS on the Burkes? I know they are being upgraded to Block 1B level Phalanx at the moment, but wondered if there was a longer term program to replace them. 3) I read somewhere that the towed sonar arrays are often no longer carried. Is this true? 4) Are there any plans to refit the Flight I's with the hangers and/or 5" 62 guns of the later flight? 5) In a non-Burke related question - is ESSM slated to be fitted to any current/future USN vessels that don't habitually carry a missile system like this? i.e CVN 21, LPH's, LPD's etc... Thanks in advance for any help....
__________________
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit - Scottish Motto "They that approve a private opinion, call it opinion; but they that dislike it, heresy; and yet heresy signifies no more than private opinion” Thomas Hobbes - Leviathan |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
2. Nope, ESSM. 3. Yes. 4. You really can't fit hangers on the original ships. 5. ESSM is replacing NSSM in Mk29 launchers. The San Antonio class has room for 16 Mk41 VLS cells and 64 ESSM missiles.
__________________
F/A-18E/F Super Hornet: The Honda Accord of fighters. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
So for example if you had a CSG 1 CVN 1 CG 2 DDG 1 SSN Cruisers usually carry between 12-24 Tomahawks. Older DDGs usually operate as ASW and Strike platforms in strike groups, usually carrying between 48-56 Tomahawks. Flight IIAs usually deploy with between 12-32 Tomahawks, between 16-64 ESSMs, and the rest SM-2s. If the SSN has VLS, it only deploys with torpedos. If the SSN doesn't have VLS, it usually carries 4 Tomahawks for Torpedo tube launch. In specific situations, loadouts are customized. During Gulf War I for example, the USS San Jacinto was designated a "Special Weapons Platform" and deployed with 122 Tomahawks. ABM AEGIS is changing this btw. ABM AEGIS is an either/or AEGIS system, meaning either it can track Ballistic Missiles, OR it operates in conventional air search. The CONOPS for ABM SSGs would put 3 AEGIS ships together, specifically 2 traditional AEGIS with 1 ABM AEGIS. Under this model the expectation is the ABM AEGIS would carry the ABM interceptors, and fill the loadout with a large number of Tomahawks and 8 ASROCs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Defense Professional
|
Wait a second, I got part of that wrong.
18 ABM ships in 9 SSGs for ABM defense, would be 2 ABM AEGIS ships and 1 conventional AEGIS ship, not the other way around. It is basically 2 trackers/launchers with 1 additional ship for escort/protection. BTW, this will become a major topic the next congressional cycle as congress discusses the CG and DDG modernization programs, which start with the FY08 budget. There is discussion that the modernization programs should include more than just 18 ABM defense ships, and/or additionally fix the limitations by allowing all AEGIS ships to operate in both modes at the same time. The CG(X) is expected to be the first ship which can operate in both modes at the same time. In fact, ABM defense is about the only thing the DD(X) has not claimed to be able to do. I do not know how easy/difficult it is to switch from one mode to the other, so I have no idea if it is a matter of returning to port, rebooting a specific system, or toggle a switch. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| World Navies Listing (updated 3/29/05) | rickusn | Naval Forces | 10 | 04-26-2005 14:08 PM |
| World Navies(Completed) | rickusn | Naval Forces | 17 | 04-03-2005 01:27 AM |
| World Navies | rickusn | Naval Forces | 0 | 03-31-2005 18:57 PM |
| World Navies Edited and Updated | rickusn | Naval Forces | 6 | 03-25-2005 22:02 PM |
| Greatly Revised Rankings | rickusn | Naval Forces | 2 | 03-20-2005 06:51 AM |