![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) | ||
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
Quote:
While Dalian is where a lot of the Naval construction has taken place lately, the facilities simply aren't big enough to build larger warships. Bloggers recently pointed out quite a few FACs and Amphibious ships have recently been upgraded/built on Zhoushan Island, ships previously unknown about. Because virtually all modern Chinese warships have been built and worked on in Dalian, it would make sense to tow the ship to where your industrial design base is. Until this summer, there weren't any large drydocks big enough in China to handle a warship that big, but now there are. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |||
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm still waiting. If you can show that there are larger ones available, please post a link. (and not some blog, please) ![]()
__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar... |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
on another note - they could always fit pods to the sucker - that would eliminate the need to cut into the hull or deck to shove in a russian derived MTU ![]() either way, IMV, they're 5-10 years away from having single capability at an operating level - and one carrier is almost useless in the context of redundancy, availability, training, work ups, fleet handling exercises etc.... the new navy boss is not fond of carriers either - he's biased towards subs, and you only have to see the dramatic shift in chinese shipbuilding to see that he's weilding far more influence than the prev Adm ever had. china is a continental power - she's not well placed to be a naval power for a variety of reasons. my 2c worth anyway |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Does the Future Belong to China? | oneman28 | World Affairs Board Pub | 7 | 08-03-2008 02:16 AM |
| Most needed in US NAVY | Praxus | Naval Forces | 345 | 05-17-2008 20:36 PM |
| China's foot in India's door | Neo | International Politics | 29 | 07-08-2007 03:31 AM |
| China, Russia, EU and Israel..... | rickusn | Naval Forces | 17 | 07-03-2007 12:24 PM |
| World Naval Rankings | rickusn | Naval Forces | 66 | 03-04-2005 01:11 AM |