![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#166 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
24 sats won't give them global racetrack redundancy at a meaningful level. numerically, 24 will give them a global constellation - but thats about it. and I seriously doubt that they will have 24 usable platforms in place - let alone a fully redundant constellation. edit: and noticed highseas qualification after posting. ![]() Last edited by gf0012-aust : 12-27-2006 at 22:35 PM. Reason: clarity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#167 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
Another big if is the planned GSLV launches. With a 50% success rate and only 4 launches under it's belt, and the next rocket planned to use the Indian cryo stage for the first time, I would not be counting chickens. Also due to the recent failure, the GSLV schedule is bound to be kicked back at least 8-12 months. The next Proton launch should go off on schedule. And whether or not the Glonass-K will be ready in time is not at all certain, and that would affect the planned Soyuz launches. Based on what we have seen in the past, it seems prudent to be a bit "cautious" wrt the schedule, if you know what I mean...
__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar... Last edited by highsea : 12-27-2006 at 23:08 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#168 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
they are regularly 2-3-4 years in lag on major capital asset delivery at the CTD level, - let alone going "gold". Bear in mind that the way that they wanted to short circuit the Glonas schedule was to invite India in as a participant. They are in no position to fast track anything. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#169 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
That's not something I would want to lay money on, lol. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#170 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
The russians really have sucker punched the indian military on a number of levels. If I was the Indian Ex-Chequer I'd have a few senior mil-personel's "nutz in a noose" and some "please explains" coming thick and fast. All good for the russians though... as I said before, their marketing people (and their contract managers) deserve hefty bonuses.... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Carrier Battle Group Essay | rickusn | Naval Forces | 56 | 09-05-2007 12:27 PM |
| Favorite Naval Book(s) | RAL's_pal? | Naval Forces | 62 | 02-09-2007 04:46 AM |
| An Interseting article.... | rickusn | Naval Forces | 2 | 05-10-2005 06:59 AM |
| World Naval Rankings | rickusn | Naval Forces | 66 | 03-04-2005 01:11 AM |