![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
|
New Names
I don't like the current names being handed out to ships (especially in the RN). Lets suggest some decent names for vessels, not the current political crap that seems popular.... so.. for the RN
Type 45: No more "D" class... lets have a proper historical naming: Revenge Resolution Repulse Relentless Rapid Resolve Furious Glorious Hood Etc As for the two CVF's - Warspite and Warrior (not Queen Elizabeth and Prince of Wales)... The USN has to stop naming carriers after politicians - what next, the USS William (Hilary) Clinton??? the madness must stop lol....
__________________
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit - Scottish Motto "They that approve a private opinion, call it opinion; but they that dislike it, heresy; and yet heresy signifies no more than private opinion” Thomas Hobbes - Leviathan Last edited by PubFather : 07-07-2006 at 17:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,365
Country:
|
No need to worry. Clinton will never get an aircraft carrier named after him/her. The Nimitz class is named after people with significant contribution to the navy. Bush Jr. might get one (CVN79).
Personally, I like most of the names the RN give to their warships. The I-class in particular. Indomitable Invincible Illustrious Irresistible Implacable Indefatigable Inflexible
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
|
The "I" class have always been been amongst my favourites because they have such a weight of history behind them - I especially resent "HMS Dragon and HMS Duncan" as frontline warships lol...
I dont understand the USN not using such legendary names like Lexington and Saratoga for their CVNs.... much better imho |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Distant Deeps or Skies
Senior Contributor
|
Warspite... NOT a name with which you want to mess.
It evokes the same emotions as this picture. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P...a_Lingayen.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,365
Country:
|
Quote:
It seems like our ships are named after places or people. Not a lot of "cool" names like the ones in the Royal Navy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Defense Professional
|
Norman Polmar goes off ranting in the July edition of Proceedings about the hull numerical system being tossed around in the Navy. Example, he doesn't like that the USS Seawolf is SSN-21, nor the USS Connecticut (SSN-22) or USS Jimmy Carter (SSN-23), because they intrude on the USS Barracuda (SS-21), USS Pickerel (SS-22), and USS Skate (SS-23).
His point is, the DD(X) is a DDG, not a DD, and even if it were a DD it should be DD-998 not DD-1000, but more realistically should be DDG-113, although as he says it will probably be DDG-2000. He then goes off about the LCS, which violates historical perspective regarding L-class ships established in 1968 as Amphibious ships. He wants the LCS to be FFL, which is the traditional symbol for littoral frigate, while my bet is most surface officers would like the LCS turned into the FFG(X) and armed up (requirement creep enter stage left). As for me, I try not to care about hulls and names, but it seems to me the system does need standards. After all, Independence was the name of an aircraft carrier that served for 39 years, 9 months, and 20 days, and no slouch either. She partisipated in not only the Cuban Missile Crisis, but also Vietnam, was on standby off Crete during the 1973 Yom Kippur war, supported peacekeeping in Lebanon in the 82 and 83, and between those deployments supported Operation Urgent Fury to liberate Grenada in 83, fought in Gulf War I in 90-91, and was the first line of defense when Operation Southern Watch took effect in 1992. Now they give the name to a LCS? What? In my opinion, the US should have 15 names reserved for Aircraft Carriers alone: USS Enterprise USS Hornet USS Lexington USS Midway USS Independence USS Ranger USS Langley USS Yorktown USS Saratoga USS Forrestal USS Oriskany USS Wasp USS Coral Sea USS Leyte Gulf USS Essex This type of system would keep politics out of names for the most important ships, if you want to name a ship after a president, Senator, Congressman, Mayor, or City Council member, use the LCS for that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
HMS Satan HMS Destroying Angel HMS Armageddon HMS Ragnarok etc... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Death, the Destroyer of Worlds...
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
I'd like to see the Carriers get names from distinguished former CVs, like 'Ark Royal' and 'Hermes'. For the RAN, I'd like the two LHD/Sea Control ships named after distinguished Flag Officers and Generals and the Destroyers named after States with Frigs named after cities and PBs after Rivers. The transports being named after Battles like the Tobruk works for me. As for the subs, it's a shame they didn't call them AE-11 and the like after our original submarines, some of them led very impressive careers.
__________________
"I have this to say to the people of Australia: Kick me, I'm different." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | ||
|
Administrator
|
Quote:
Lexington and Saratoga were carriers, not Ticos. Nothing named for them since the Essex-class carrier and the Forrestal-class carrier, respectively. The Tico-class does/did include Yorktown and Leyte Gulf however. And - as usual - there has to be the one black sheep, USS Thomas S. Gates (CG-51) Quote:
Last edited by TopHatter : 07-11-2006 at 11:50 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Afghanistan opposes missile names | hammer | Operation Enduring Freedom | 64 | 12-14-2007 04:00 AM |
| New Zealand names Project Protector ships | Sea Toby | Naval Forces | 2 | 04-13-2006 23:59 PM |
| Afghanistan opposes missile names | Alamgir | Operation Enduring Freedom | 7 | 02-28-2006 06:53 AM |
| Architects of Pakistan | Gabru47 | Political Discussions | 7 | 09-03-2005 11:23 AM |