2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Naval Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-08-2006, 02:47 AM   #31 (permalink)
bull
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-17-05
Posts: 2,982
If iran touches a ship passing thru the int'l sealanes,then they had it.

Bush wud be the happiest and wud be praying for such a thing to happen as that wud increase the support he will get for his gulfwar 3.
__________________
What's the difference between people who pray in church and those who pray in casinos?
The ones in the casinos are serious.
bull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2006, 11:26 AM   #32 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 17,064
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by -{SpoonmaN}-
No, I'd imagine you could, but it would make things that much harder. Apart from having to destroy the Iranian Navy (not sure what it's like these days but I know it was rather formidable once upon a time), achieving Air dominance and carrying out whatever other operations (SF raids, short-term incursions or a full-blown invasion depening on the scenario) would be required, minesweeping would be an extra hassle that would increase the economic damage Iran could do to the USA. And like I said, it would tie down more ships and aircraft as they would be needed to protect the minesweepers.
It has ALREADY happenned. It's called the Tanker War. Traffic did not stopped. And the entire Iranian Navy was effectively destroyed. The current Iranian bluff is way overblown.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 00:44 AM   #33 (permalink)
Wraith601
Title Classified
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,144
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
It has ALREADY happenned. It's called the Tanker War. Traffic did not stopped. And the entire Iranian Navy was effectively destroyed. The current Iranian bluff is way overblown.
David Poyer wrote a prtty good book called The Gulf that's set during the Tanker War.
__________________
"We always have been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be, detested in France."
-Sir Arthur Wellesley
Wraith601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 11:43 AM   #34 (permalink)
Tronic
Navajo Code Talker
Senior Contributor
 
Tronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-27-04
Location: Patiala, India
Posts: 5,433
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by -{SpoonmaN}-
Seems like most of the Gulf States are setting themselves up as tourist centres and money laundering facilities etc.
Saudi Arabia would be a fantastically lucrative tourist location if it weren't for their Government's warped view on Islam and morality. But I guess they have to do something to appease the fundamentalists in their midst if they want to keep their heads, since they obviously aren't going to bother with real democracy, human rights or education and poverty reduction efforts.
poverty in Saudi Arabia????????? never heard of that......
__________________
Nabha Sparasham Deeptam
-Touch The Sky With Glory
Tronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 12:29 PM   #35 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Posts: 9,917
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asim Aquil
I live in Dubai. Which is hardly dependent any more on Oil. Yet its the most advanced Middle Eastern city.
All consumer goods pass through here. Theres still lots to do. A lot more infact..
Good point, glad to see that Dubai has diversified. But how much business do the Oil States do with or in Dubai? What happens when their petro-dollars dry up?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asim Aquil
Anyway the discussion was about Iran. Iran would have options open.
Another good point...though thread-hijacking is a favorite pasttime around here
__________________
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.
~John Quincy Adams
TopHatter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 13:17 PM   #36 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 17,064
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tronic
poverty in Saudi Arabia????????? never heard of that......
You've never been to that sewage hole of a country. There's proverty all right. Big time proverty.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 16:27 PM   #37 (permalink)
Jay
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 6,492
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
You've never been to that sewage hole of a country. There's proverty all right. Big time proverty.
Saudi Arabia's unemployment is around 20-30 percent. So its a no brainer that they have poverty in Saudi Arabia. And a lot more people survive coz of the doles they receive from the government.
__________________
A grain of wheat eclipsed the sun of Adam !!
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 21:15 PM   #38 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,737
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by -{SpoonmaN}-
No, I'd imagine you could, but it would make things that much harder. Apart from having to destroy the Iranian Navy (not sure what it's like these days but I know it was rather formidable once upon a time),
The Iranian navy formidable? In whose fantasy world?

They have about 3 old frigates and a couple of corvettes that can float, plus a dozen or so patrol boats. The only real wet threat they have are 3 Kilo SSKs. And mines, of course.

But all that's pretty easy pickins for the USN.

Quote:
achieving Air dominance and carrying out whatever other operations (SF raids, short-term incursions or a full-blown invasion depening on the scenario) would be required, minesweeping would be an extra hassle that would increase the economic damage Iran could do to the USA. And like I said, it would tie down more ships and aircraft as they would be needed to protect the minesweepers.
Fine, send 2 CVBGs instead of one - whooptie-do.

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2006, 03:21 AM   #39 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,209
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
It has ALREADY happenned. It's called the Tanker War. Traffic did not stopped. And the entire Iranian Navy was effectively destroyed. The current Iranian bluff is way overblown.
A former coworker of mine was on an LSD during that period escorting tankers through the strait. He said his ship had SEALs with their black helos onboard. They spotted some Iranians trying to mine the strait in the middle of the night. They put them out of action. Thermal imagers are a wonderful thing.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2006, 15:53 PM   #40 (permalink)
sparten
Actus Reus
Senior Contributor
 
sparten's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-10-04
Location: You would like to know would'nt you?
Posts: 1,695
Country:
Last time an Iranian Navy was formidable was 486 BC, Battle of Salamis.
But they could cause significant headaches for people. Navigable channels in the Straits of Hormuz for the large oil tankers are fairly narrow and if they do scuttle any obstacle in those channels the traffic would be seriously impaired.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parihaka
They return to 700ad
When they were ruling an empire which streched from France to India? Not a bad idea.
__________________
"Any relations in a social order will endure if there is infused into them some of that spirit of human sympathy, which qualifies life for immortality." ~ George William Russell
sparten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2006, 18:46 PM   #41 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,965
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by sparten
Last time an Iranian Navy was formidable was 486 BC, Battle of Salamis.
But they could cause significant headaches for people. Navigable channels in the Straits of Hormuz for the large oil tankers are fairly narrow and if they do scuttle any obstacle in those channels the traffic would be seriously impaired.


When they were ruling an empire which streched from France to India? Not a bad idea.
, yeah but the rest of us have moved on matey
Edit: In retrospect, you can have France
__________________
In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

Last edited by Parihaka : 04-10-2006 at 18:48 PM.
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2006, 19:21 PM   #42 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 17,064
Country:
Lmao!!!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Iranian1073_49171_0d4e3dddd9c7413.jpg (26.2 KB, 162 views)
File Type: jpg Iranian1073_49171_85b0edb3ed66095.jpg (26.4 KB, 154 views)
File Type: jpg Iranian1073_49171_111a4e1aea8abe5.jpg (30.4 KB, 157 views)
File Type: jpg Iranian1073_49171_ab0b6fd2d88f743.jpg (27.8 KB, 155 views)
File Type: jpg Iranian1073_49171_e55c51cda9be95f.jpg (32.6 KB, 153 views)
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2006, 21:29 PM   #43 (permalink)
Blademaster
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-15-03
Posts: 3,259
Ha ha ha.

The US warship doesn't need missiles to kill those boats. All she needs to do is run over them but again they may be packed with explosives like the Cole bombing so just get a M-50 gun with a good scope and blow that motherfvcker out of the water.

Couple Perry Oliver frigates should do the job.
Blademaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2006, 22:00 PM   #44 (permalink)
Jay
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 6,492
Country:
Can we draw parallels to those pirate ships on the Somalian coast?

I guess USN would be pretty confused how to kill these dingy's!! It will be an overkill anyways
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2006, 00:23 AM   #45 (permalink)
sparten
Actus Reus
Senior Contributor
 
sparten's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-10-04
Location: You would like to know would'nt you?
Posts: 1,695
Country:
Errr, sir, that looks a lot like the Shatt-Ul-Arab.
The Loylds of London guy we spoke to seemed pretty worried about them blocking the straits of hormuz, former RN man.
sparten is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LCA beats F-16 Mr_Vastu Military Aviation 137 08-27-2008 14:00 PM
Nuclear Iran Lahori paa jee The Iranian Question 32 04-17-2006 00:30 AM
Iran And Possible Developments Gazi The Iranian Question 2 02-26-2006 12:02 PM
Russia says opposes use of force against Iran Alamgir The Iranian Question 34 09-29-2005 04:39 AM
An Article worthy of Lull..... MIKEMUN Political Discussions 2 03-18-2005 20:04 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:32 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8