![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
"Cold War Submarines" by Norman Polmar
"Cold War Submarines;
The design and construction of US and Soviet Submarines" By Norman Polmar and K J Moore. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/157...lance&n=283155 -Polmar has had some really intersting books in the past, including many years editions of "The Ships and Aircraft of the U S Fleet". He is clearly very knowlegable, and has composed many interesting books. After reading his book "Cold War Submarines" I was rather suprised at the conclusion that seems to be drawn from the book in that US subs were not as good as their Soviet counterparts toward the end of the cold war. Weapons in every catagory and some the west never had, non acoustic quieting, speed, dive depth, automation all seem to favor the Soviets. Maintenance, reliability, sonar, personnel tallent and experience were US strengths. I was mistaken to think the US had such a lead, that is if I should take his conclusion. Any thoughts? Is this the general impression of the two sub fleets? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
|
Quote:
The "other" Norman (Dr Friedman) is different story entirely. ![]()
__________________
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader. ~John Quincy Adams |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
|
Quote:
Apparently the Soviets didn't mind if their submarine crews glowed in the dark. Not unlike the clean-up workers at Chernobyl. Quieter? Again, definitely. But thanks to the Walker-Whitworth spy ring, the Soviets were informed of how hideously vulnerable their noisey submarines were and they worked to close the gap. Soviet subs like Akula are a good example of lessons learned. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Staff Emeritus
Chief Subversive |
I've heard from a number of sources that Soviet submarine designs were superior performers in the areas of speed, diving depth, and some weapons technologies. Unfortunately, those advantages meant very little when noise and sonar are the deciding factors in submersable warfare, and the west was WAY ahead in those arenas. It's also known that Soviet quality control was attrocious. I toured a Foxtrot diesel submarine commisioned in 1974 with a friend who's a welder. He couldn't wait to get off of it, the welds frightened him to the point he expected it to sink peerside.
__________________
The black flag is raised: Ban them all... Let the Admin sort them out. I know I'm going to have the last word... I have powers of deletion and lock.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Clinton and Iraq war | Major_Armstrong | Political Discussions | 11 | 09-26-2008 04:46 AM |
| Analysis: Chechnya | Ironduke | The Western Alliance | 4 | 07-28-2008 19:30 PM |
| Bush, Blair for 'War Crimes' | Ray | Political Discussions | 22 | 03-04-2007 16:46 PM |
| Articles and links for the Military Professional | Officer of Engineers | The Staff College | 115 | 11-20-2006 11:28 AM |
| Nervous in Baghdad | Shek | The War in Iraq | 0 | 07-18-2005 10:37 AM |