Defense, Miitary, and Geopolitical Forum
                                                     The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | WAB Bookstore



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Defense > NATO & The Russian Resurgence



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-09-2008, 04:47 AM   #1 (permalink)
Ray
Suspended
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 29,172
Country:
Medvedev promotes new security pact

Quote:
Medvedev promotes new security pact

* Julian Borger, diplomatic editor and Luke Harding in Moscow
* The Guardian,
* Thursday October 9 2008

Russia's president, Dmitry Medvedev, outlined plans yesterday for a new security pact to ban the use of force in Europe and defuse increasing tensions between Moscow and Nato.

Yesterday's speech at the World Policy Conference in Evian, France, was intended as a bridge-building exercise after Russia's occupation of Georgia in August, which threatened a new cold war.

Medvedev promised that by midnight last night Russian troops would leave "security zones" in the undisputed areas of Georgian territory. However, the Georgian government claimed the withdrawal was only partial and that Russian troops showed no signs of leaving the strategic outpost of Akhalgori, near the Georgian capital, Tbilisi, and outside the breakaway region of South Ossetia. Russian authorities also continued to block EU monitors from entering South Ossetia and Abkhazia (recognised as independent states by Moscow), which have been at the centre of the Russia-Georgia conflict. European diplomats said the monitors would try to cross the lines again soon.

"We are absolutely not interested in confrontation," said Medvedev, devoting much of his speech to giving details of a new European security agreement that he first mentioned earlier in the year.

The new European pact would include "a clear affirmation of the inadmissibility of the use of force - or the threat of force - in international relations" and would be built on the principle of the territorial integrity of independent nations.

It would also prevent "the development of military alliances to harm the security of other members of the treaty" - a clear reference to Nato expansion, which Moscow sees as a significant threat to its security.

Western diplomats said the proposals remained vague, and sounded unlikely to gain wide support in Europe. The US, Britain and eastern Europe in particular refuse to contemplate a Russian veto on Nato membership for states such as Ukraine or Georgia.

A Russian official said the Medvedev initiative was a "work in progress" currently being discussed in European capitals. Britain's foreign secretary, David Miliband, talked it over with his Russian counterpart, Sergey Lavrov, at the UN last month. The aim, the Russian official said, was to elicit responses and then invite European leaders to a summit, probably after a new US administration takes office in January.

"This is a highly revisionist speech," said David Clark, the chairman of the Russia Foundation, a London-based thinktank. "It's clearly an attempt to rewrite the post-cold war settlement. A lot of what Medvedev is talking about was in the Charter of Paris in 1990." The charter paved the way for the new Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe after the fall of the Berlin Wall.

"Moscow wants a security relationship dependent on power rather than values," Clark added. "The Russian government has been hostile to the OSCE since about 2003-04, when it started to criticise Russian elections."

The Russian official said that in recent years that the OSCE had tilted from a military-political organisation to an organisation promoting human rights and democracy.
Medvedev promotes new security pact | World news | The Guardian
I am posting this to merely increase my awareness of this region i.e. the ex Soviet satellites since in the Cold War era, they did not count and were clubbed with the USSR and its policies.

Now that they are in what is called the 'free world', it would be interesting to know what they feel.

How far is this plan workable?

What are the hidden spanners that this plan contains as far as the ex satellites of the USSR are concerned!
__________________


"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

HAKUNA MATATA
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share this thread with friends:

Tags
russia, security pact



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Causes & Consequences of Strategic Failure in Afghanistan & Iraq lulldapull The War in Iraq 35 05-20-2008 03:48 AM
Australia, Indonesia sign security pact Ironduke International Defense Topics 3 11-27-2006 08:20 AM
25,000 civilians KilledIn Iraq jimmy22 The War in Iraq 88 08-13-2005 11:41 AM
Failure Isn't An Option Shek The War in Iraq 94 07-07-2005 01:04 AM

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:02 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting and a specialist in joomla hosting services.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.