Defense, Miitary, and Geopolitical Forum
                                                     The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | WAB Bookstore


LOGIN or REGISTER to REMOVE ADS

Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Defense > NATO & The Russian Resurgence



Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-18-2008, 21:18 PM   #31 (permalink)
Patron
 
Alex_Ivanov's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-17-06
Location: Kamchatka, Russia
Posts: 200
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by zraver View Post
How much of that is being reported in the Russian press?
I visited websites of BBC, CNN and FoxNews daily during the conflict. It was funny - at the very moment Georgians said somethig, it was reported as a fact. 'Russians have taken Gori' anyone? Russian media reported all the same, with one important difference - all those 'facts' were accompanied by 'Georgians say'. It was enough and helped to understand that it maybe fact, maybe not, but Georgians said. Reporting opinions as facts and facts as opinions isn't really what they call 'telling the truth', so I fail to see that western 'free press' is somehow better in this regard than Russian.
Alex_Ivanov is offline  
Old 08-18-2008, 21:54 PM   #32 (permalink)
Ray
Suspended
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 29,172
Country:
All media, the world over, are biased.

What's new about that?

If anyone feels that they are not biased, then that view itself, is biased!
__________________


"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

HAKUNA MATATA
Ray is offline  
Old 08-18-2008, 22:11 PM   #33 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: 03-18-08
Location: Portugal
Posts: 17
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex_Ivanov View Post
I visited websites of BBC, CNN and FoxNews daily during the conflict. It was funny - at the very moment Georgians said somethig, it was reported as a fact. 'Russians have taken Gori' anyone? Russian media reported all the same, with one important difference - all those 'facts' were accompanied by 'Georgians say'. It was enough and helped to understand that it maybe fact, maybe not, but Georgians said. Reporting opinions as facts and facts as opinions isn't really what they call 'telling the truth', so I fail to see that western 'free press' is somehow better in this regard than Russian.
What you name "western" is in fact dozens of countries and you (and that one from Minsk) are arguing that the media from dozens of countries are propaganda and yours, from Putin land, are in fact free... yup, the cold war is back.

Responding to the original message: is easy to destroy some undeveloped country in your back yard, Sadam have done the same and where is him now?
There was no need for the Russian army destroy civilian houses and lives, the way it did. No one is trying to invade or destroy Russia. This kind of behavior is to distract the internal oppositions by creating a foreign enemy... is the oldest deception in the book. Why don't the Russian media and public opinion concentrate their attentions on corruption and lack of democratic control of state power?
WGSA is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 01:09 AM   #34 (permalink)
Patron
 
Alex_Ivanov's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-17-06
Location: Kamchatka, Russia
Posts: 200
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by WGSA View Post
What you name "western" is in fact dozens of countries and you (and that one from Minsk) are arguing that the media from dozens of countries are propaganda and yours, from Putin land, are in fact free... yup, the cold war is back.
First of all, I try to avoid the word 'popaganda' by all means. I'd call it bias. Here I have to agree with Ray that all media are biased in one way or another. Next, I didn't speak about dozens of countries, I just named three sources, and explained, why in this particular case they look much more biased than russian ones. If you want to argue my view, bring your examples, and drop general phrases.
Alex_Ivanov is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 02:10 AM   #35 (permalink)
New Member
 
Eugene120's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-15-08
Location: Moscow
Posts: 16
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by zraver View Post
Lets comapre facts, western media when they could get away from thier Russian handles have only been able to verify 44 deaths of civilians in Tsvalli, the town is mostly standing not Stalingrad lite as portrayted. Russia ble wup rail bridges, sank coast guard cutters, has yet to pull back, is openly calling for the annexation of 2 regions of Georgia. Vidoes show Russian troops usin BM-13 Grads in Goergia, Russia has fired SS-21 terror missiles, destroyed police stations, allowed looting, use dslave labor and the list goes on. How much of that is being reported in the Russian press?
Well, I guess you still can't understand that not everything and almost everything the media says in times of confrontation is false, propaganda etc.
Do you really believe all these thoughts and ask me something like "how much of these true facts were reported in your media"? Right?

And please coul you give me a link to the source that ever mentioned annexation of SO and A?!
Who says about allowing looting?! CNN?! haha.
Eugene120 is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 02:12 AM   #36 (permalink)
New Member
 
Eugene120's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-15-08
Location: Moscow
Posts: 16
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by WGSA View Post
What you name "western" is in fact dozens of countries and you (and that one from Minsk) are arguing that the media from dozens of countries are propaganda and yours, from Putin land, are in fact free... yup, the cold war is back.
And whose media is free?! Perhaps US or UK media? Or German? Are you serious?
Eugene120 is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 03:10 AM   #37 (permalink)
BFG
Regular
 
Join Date: 08-12-08
Posts: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by zraver View Post
Lets comapre facts, western media when they could get away from thier Russian handles have only been able to verify 44 deaths of civilians in Tsvalli, the town is mostly standing not Stalingrad lite as portrayted. Russia ble wup rail bridges, sank coast guard cutters, has yet to pull back, is openly calling for the annexation of 2 regions of Georgia. Vidoes show Russian troops usin BM-13 Grads in Goergia, Russia has fired SS-21 terror missiles, destroyed police stations, allowed looting, use dslave labor and the list goes on. How much of that is being reported in the Russian press?

1) The climate of SO is very hot. Survivors buried corpses everywhere where there might. It was shown on our TV (along with inspecton of dozens geargeans troops with blacks (0-o ?!) among them.

2) CNN showed interview with some ossetian doctor from one of several field hospitals. They distorted the meaning of his speech during translation and cutted some parts off: he said that no one can get out of town because of the bombing, so the number is that low. That lay was spread everywhere as a fact

3) All facts you mentioned are discussed in Russian news.
BFG is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 03:17 AM   #38 (permalink)
BFG
Regular
 
Join Date: 08-12-08
Posts: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex_Ivanov View Post
First of all, I try to avoid the word 'popaganda' by all means. I'd call it bias. Here I have to agree with Ray that all media are biased in one way or another. Next, I didn't speak about dozens of countries, I just named three sources, and explained, why in this particular case they look much more biased than russian ones. If you want to argue my view, bring your examples, and drop general phrases.
+1
Bring your examples and let's operate confirmed facts by vids or fotos .

Any normal person won't support the killing of civilians. Unlikely we are arguing about it. The difference between us is in information base.
BFG is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 20:15 PM   #39 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: 03-18-08
Location: Portugal
Posts: 17
Country:
so I fail to see that western 'free press' is somehow better in this regard than Russian.[/QUOTE]

Yes you named tree sources but i believe that "Western" was your word. And i stand by my comment.
If any NATO bomb kills anyone you can easily see manifestations on the street (ex or actual communist party members, the poor bastards fail to realize that Russia is no longer communist). Russian planes destroy dozens of houses and its nothing. If it smells...
WGSA is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 20:26 PM   #40 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: 03-18-08
Location: Portugal
Posts: 17
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene120 View Post
And whose media is free?! Perhaps US or UK media? Or German? Are you serious?
What can i say...
US, UK, Germany are in fact controlled by some president that tend to kill or put in prison those who dare to criticize him

Yes the cold war is Back.

What make me stunned is the fact that Russia and EU/UE have so much to gain by working together, but in stead the mentality of the ex KGB gains preponderance. EU/UE don't posses any threat to Russia, only in the old cold war mentality.
WGSA is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 21:52 PM   #41 (permalink)
Patron
 
Alex_Ivanov's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-17-06
Location: Kamchatka, Russia
Posts: 200
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by WGSA View Post
Yes you named tree sources but i believe that "Western" was your word.
Should I call them eastern?

Quote:
If any NATO bomb kills anyone you can easily see manifestations on the street (ex or actual communist party members, the poor bastards fail to realize that Russia is no longer communist). Russian planes destroy dozens of houses and its nothing. If it smells...
I'm not even going to ask for a proof that any civilian target was purposely hit. 'Everybody knows' is great explanation for any statement.

Quote:
US, UK, Germany are in fact controlled by some president that tend to kill or put in prison those who dare to criticize him
Yeah, Putin is bloody dictator, 'everybody knows'.
Alex_Ivanov is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 21:53 PM   #42 (permalink)
Banished
 
Join Date: 07-18-06
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 132
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex_Ivanov View Post
First of all, I try to avoid the word 'popaganda' by all means. I'd call it bias. Here I have to agree with Ray that all media are biased in one way or another. Next, I didn't speak about dozens of countries, I just named three sources, and explained, why in this particular case they look much more biased than russian ones. If you want to argue my view, bring your examples, and drop general phrases.
My personal opinion. I dont blame the Russians totally for starting this war but helping provoke it yes. The Russian Government has even stated publicly that the US did not give the Georgian Government the green light to attack. I do believe that the president of Georgia did make a mistake by falling into a war. It did start when 6 or their policemen were killed and they made a very innept attempt to regain their breakawy provinces. While you may not believe me the average american quite frankly does not care if those two provinces stay a part of Georgia or not and I am one of them. It fairly obvious they dont want to be part of the Republic of Georgia and so be it. What concerns me is the Russian Military classless as usual making Georgians clean the streets and humiliating them. It seems to me that through all these years the Russian Military has not learned how to win!!! and do it with honor and class. The Georgian Military is clearly defeated but yet your military and Politicians still feel the need to take prisoners and conficate equipment. Really stupid is conficating 4 US Humvees that had no part in the war and trying to escilate it by bringing a reponse from the US. While tied down in two wars it is assumed by the Russian Commanders that the US is weak and unable to do anything. That may turn around and bite the Russian Bear that managed to destroy a country that had 37,000 total military, I am still laughing over that one. It seems while you have some good point you are way off on some others. I do agree with you that Russia is not totally at fault for starting this war, but it does share some blame. So keep our 4 humvees (what your military will gain off of them I dont know considering we sell them on the market comercially in Russia) but be very carefull of wanting to draw US and NATO into the conflict I see a re-energized Russian military but not a very good one and most certainly a tasteless one.
usplanefan67 is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 23:33 PM   #43 (permalink)
Banished
 
Join Date: 08-14-08
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by WGSA View Post
Yes you named tree sources but i believe that "Western" was your word. And i stand by my comment.
If any NATO bomb kills anyone you can easily see manifestations on the street (ex or actual communist party members, the poor bastards fail to realize that Russia is no longer communist). Russian planes destroy dozens of houses and its nothing. If it smells...
/me remembers dozens of cases then poor civilians in Afganistan and Iraq were killed by dozens by NATO aviation

/me dont remembers any manifestations in NATO countries

/me confused!

Last edited by I-War; 08-19-2008 at 23:49 PM..
I-War is offline  
Old 08-20-2008, 00:13 AM   #44 (permalink)
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
 
zraver's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-22-06
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 5,901
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BFG View Post
1) The climate of SO is very hot. Survivors buried corpses everywhere where there might. It was shown on our TV (along with inspecton of dozens geargeans troops with blacks (0-o ?!) among them.
got a link to this video? Of the blacks, of the graves, death certificates, funerals, how about pictures showing Tsvalli looking like Stalingrad.

Quote:
2) CNN showed interview with some ossetian doctor from one of several field hospitals. They distorted the meaning of his speech during translation and cutted some parts off: he said that no one can get out of town because of the bombing, so the number is that low. That lay was spread everywhere as a fact

3) All facts you mentioned are discussed in Russian news.

It was a doctor at Tisvalli's hospital, not a field hospital which by the way would be Russian military.
zraver is offline  
Old 08-20-2008, 03:40 AM   #45 (permalink)
BFG
Regular
 
Join Date: 08-12-08
Posts: 30
EXILED ONLINE - MANKIND’S ONLY ALTERNATIVE » War Nerd: South Ossetia, The War of My Dreams - By Gary Brecher

It's so funny to read "banned in Russia" from Moscow =)))

Zraver, i've changed a little my position during our conversation, so I'm waiting for exact numbers of killed. Vids are interviews with refugees, I'l post'em here later (have a lot of work today, no time to translate).

Now the problem is: Georgians now can not control (and some times don't want to) their own territory and protect it from ossetians. If our army leaves - there will be another genocide - of georgeans by ossetians.
BFG is offline  
Closed Thread

Share this thread with friends:



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Russian troops advance in Georgia Ironduke NATO & The Russian Resurgence 7 08-13-2008 00:32 AM
Russia on the march - again Ray NATO & The Russian Resurgence 312 02-14-2008 19:18 PM
Sudan arrests teacher over 'Mohammed' bear gunnut International Economy 139 12-06-2007 20:10 PM
Georgia Asking for Trouble Ray International Politics 1 11-01-2006 21:23 PM
Putin’s Logic On Georgia And The Frozen Conflicts Ray International Politics 0 10-24-2006 15:39 PM

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting and a specialist in joomla hosting services.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.