Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Sturmpanzer I "Bison"

  1. #1
    Patron Nord's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 Feb 06
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    295

    Sturmpanzer I "Bison"



    (15cm sIG33(Sf) auf Panzerkampfwagen I Ausf B)

    150mm sIG 33 L/11.4 heavy infantry gun (mortar) carrier was built on the unmodified chassis of PzKpfw I Ausf B. The vehicle was operated by the crew of five and only three rounds of high-explosive ammunition were carried. Only 3 crewmen rode in the vehicle, while the other two along with more ammunition rode in a halftrack. Crew was protected only by a large box-shaped gun shield (made up of three 10mm plates), open at the top and rear. Only 38 were converted in January/February of 1940 by Alkett in Berlin. The gun and superstructure overloaded the chassis leading to poor mobility. The idea behind this vehicle was to provide infantry with direct and mobile fire support unit. Sturmpanzer I saw service in the West, Balkans and Russia with 701-706 sIG(Sf) Kompanien - Heavy Infantry Gun Companies (each had 6 vehicles), originally attached to Panzer Divisions and then Panzer Corps. Last of them were taken out from service (with 704 Company of 5th Panzer Division) in late 1943. It was the first of many self-propelled support vehicles produced during the war.
    http://armor.se/forum/banner/armorse-banner3.jpg

  2. #2
    Senior Contributor Stitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 Nov 06
    Location
    Patterson, CA
    Posts
    1,674
    I always admired the ingenuity of the German designers of WWII when they would "kitbash" various armaments and armored chassis; the Bison looks a little top-heavy to me, but I suppose it still worked! My favorite was the Grille 17, or Geschutzwagon Tiger fur 17cm Kanone 72 (sf); only one prototype was even started, but it would've been a SERIOUS fire support weapon: it mounted a 170mm artillery piece on a (heavily) modified Tiger II chassis.

    "Yeah. See, we plan ahead, that way we don't do anything right now. Earl explained it to me." - Tremors, 1990

  3. #3
    Patron Nord's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 Feb 06
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    295
    It was to heavy, they had problems with the suspension.
    http://armor.se/forum/banner/armorse-banner3.jpg

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. China "claims" to have cracked "another" terrorist Cell for Olympics
    By ned kelly in forum International Economy
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 28 Jul 08,, 22:10
  2. Russian tank "Black Eagle" ("object 640")
    By foxhound_nn in forum Ground Warfare
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 27 Dec 07,, 05:53
  3. Replies: 44
    Last Post: 16 Jun 07,, 06:11
  4. "Standard sources" get their a$$es kicked again by "substandard media"
    By Leader in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01 Jul 05,, 20:09

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •