![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
| View Poll Results: Which Are The Best Air Force Pilots : | |||
| Russian Air Force |
|
15 | 7.85% |
| U S A F |
|
46 | 24.08% |
| P L A A F - China |
|
3 | 1.57% |
| Indian Air Force |
|
54 | 28.27% |
| R A F |
|
18 | 9.42% |
| R A A F - Australia |
|
3 | 1.57% |
| Canadian Air Force |
|
6 | 3.14% |
| Luftwaffe |
|
5 | 2.62% |
| French Air Force |
|
1 | 0.52% |
| Royal Saudi Air Force |
|
0 | 0% |
| Israeli Air Force |
|
29 | 15.18% |
| Imperial Iranian Air Force |
|
1 | 0.52% |
| PAF - Pakistan |
|
10 | 5.24% |
| Voters: 191. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#286 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
|
Fancy flying does not a fighter make.
Furthermore very few Russian pilots get to fly long enough to retain their skills; USAF pilots get some 200 flight hours a year, sometimes more depending on things, while Russian pilots get 20 if that. So what eh? Well, it so happens that Air to Air profficiency is HIGHLY dependant on practice. You don't practice? You suck. This isn't even an opinion, this is a scientifically and emprirically backed up fact. In other words, you can go ahead and ask your Russian pilot buddy if this is true, and if he tells you it isn't, he's lying, or he's not a combat pilot ![]() So what does this fact say about Russian pilots? They suck. Sorry. |
|
|
|
|
#289 (permalink) | |
|
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional |
Quote:
![]()
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory." - George Orwell |
|
|
|
|
|
#290 (permalink) |
|
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional |
I'll give you this: there are some OUTSTANDING Russian pilots. Every time the International Aerobatics Champoinships are held, Russians always do very well, sometimes sweeping the medals.
And some of their demonstration pilots are masters, and can wring more out of their aircraft than anybody else can from theirs. HOWEVER, that is not what we're talking about. If you take a name at random from the sked board of any unit and pit him in all flying aspects of his job - and there's a lot more to it than being a stick actuator - with any of his counterparts, lather, rinse, repeat, until you get to the end of comparable units - you will find out that, excluding rookies straight from UPT and the extremely rare on-its-ass unit, US pilots from all services SMOKE everybody else but the Brits and Israelis. Russians? PLEASE. |
|
|
|
|
#296 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
In terms of stick and rudder skills, naval aviators are the best pilots in the world. Among that rather small set, US naval aviators are the best of the best. In terms of safety, US corporate pilots have the lowest total accident rate and lowest fatal accident rate. It is not fair to compare military aviation to civilian aviation as the risks that the military take are greater than those that civilians will tolerate. In terms of training, the combined USN, USAF and US Army training pipelines are without comparison. They routinely turn out 2000 new fixed wing aviators per year. The same system turns out about 2000 new rotar wing aviators per year. That's just new aviators. No system anywhere else comes close to that, either in number or safety. What that does not count is upgrades and recurrent training! All told the US armed forces are probably giving some training to a quarter of all the world's active aviators during the course of one year.
|
|
|
|
|
#297 (permalink) | |
|
WAB BOUNCER
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#298 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
Navy pilots (yeah I said it) might be among the best when they're IN THEIR ELEMENT. But day to day...I just cant give that title to a group that demonstrates a wanton disregard for basic safety of flight so often. Hell, UHF Guard (243.0) has a nickname...Navy Common. Last edited by Jimmy : 12-21-2006 at 17:22 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#299 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
It is a qualitative measure. In practical terms the USAF, USN and USA are so influential in training the world's military aviatiors that many are simply a branch from one tree. That makes it difficult to separate out one set of aviators from one particular service and say they are the best. Best at what? Best trained? if that is the case then you have to look at the source and the source is the US.
|
|
|
|
|
#300 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Indian Military - Daily Update | Endangered | South Asian Defense Topics | 1447 | 08-29-2008 04:07 AM |
| Su-27 or F-15? | flanker | Military Aviation | 258 | 05-15-2008 21:48 PM |
| Articles and links for the Military Professional | Officer of Engineers | The Staff College | 115 | 11-20-2006 11:28 AM |
| New Long Range Bomber | PubFather | Military Aviation | 41 | 10-27-2006 15:53 PM |
| Soviet Air Power in Afghanistan | IDonT | Military Aviation | 0 | 06-19-2006 16:50 PM |