2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
View Poll Results: What's best?
F/A-22A Raptor 47 71.21%
F/A-18E Super Hornet 4 6.06%
JSF 4 6.06%
EF-2000 2 3.03%
Su-47A Berkut 9 13.64%
Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-09-2005, 12:40 PM   #1 (permalink)
Insomniac
Banished
 
Insomniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-05
Posts: 214
Only for people who know their stuff

Okay guys I'm basing this off information of what the military aviation will be like in 2015. Assuming the technology that the US, Russia, China, and EU are testing becomes standard production use.

Russia: The Russians are currently experimenting with plasma stealth and claim that it makes their jets just as or more stealthy as an F/A-22A Raptor. All the Russian fighter jets radar signatures will be drastically reduced to almost nothing.

Russian weapons include the R-77, AA-11, and AA-12. All these are counterparts that are equal to the American AIM-120C and AIM-9X missiles.

Also experimenting with the Su-47A Berkut air-superiority fighter.

Lastly experimenting with helmet mounted sights.

United States: Currently experimenting with technology similiar to plasma stealth, probably working around 2015. All the American fighter jet radar signatures will be reduced to nothing as well.

Also experimenting with the new AIM-120D AMRAAM missile that is supposed to have a 50% increase in range (approx. 37-38 miles) and smaller escape envolope.

Also experimentiing with AESA Radar for the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and a slightly weaker version for the F/A-22A Raptor.

Lastly experimenting with the new Joint Strike Fighter and Joint helmet mounted cueing system.

European Union: Currently helping US with JSF.

Has Meteor missile with a range of 70-50 miles and very small escape envolope, probably upgrading it.

China: Currently buying all weapons from Russia.

Made J-10 Aircraft with perfomance level similiar to F-16C.
Insomniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2005, 12:43 PM   #2 (permalink)
leib10
HKHolic
Senior Contributor
 
leib10's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-17-05
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 3,240
Country:
R-77 and AA-12 are the same thing.

And I think we have about 20 of these threads saying the more or less the same thing.
__________________
"The right man in the wrong place can make all the difference in the world. So wake up, Mr. Freeman. Wake up and smell the ashes." G-Man

Last edited by leib10 : 11-09-2005 at 13:14 PM.
leib10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2005, 13:56 PM   #3 (permalink)
JG73
Contributor
 
JG73's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: Germany
Posts: 484
Country:
Please....not another one. Moreover it is a stupid question.
JG73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2005, 16:13 PM   #4 (permalink)
canoe
Military Professional
 
canoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-13-05
Posts: 698
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JG73
Please....not another one. Moreover it is a stupid question.
I second this, this thread has already been created many times. I think everyones opinions have been made.
canoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2005, 17:27 PM   #5 (permalink)
The_Burning_Kid
Contributor
 
The_Burning_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-07-05
Posts: 444
Do I qualify as someone that knows something, in your opinion?
The_Burning_Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2005, 22:26 PM   #6 (permalink)
Insomniac
Banished
 
Insomniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-05
Posts: 214
I just don't want any people that have no idea what "AMRAAM" stands for or, in general, don't know a thing about fighter jets getting on here and voting something random. I don't mean for the title to be offensive. It's only supposed to attract attention and well... it sure did the job.

I wanted to know if you guys still think the F/A-22A Raptor reigns supreme with all this new technology coming out. That's all.

Last edited by Insomniac : 11-09-2005 at 22:35 PM.
Insomniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2005, 22:27 PM   #7 (permalink)
Insomniac
Banished
 
Insomniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-05
Posts: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Burning_Kid
Do I qualify as someone that knows something, in your opinion?
In my opinion, yes you do.
Insomniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2005, 23:17 PM   #8 (permalink)
The_Burning_Kid
Contributor
 
The_Burning_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-07-05
Posts: 444
I will have to say F-22. It outdoes its competitories with the combination of stealth, manuverability, avionics, design, and all-around performance to dominate the sky. Also it has a record against F-15s and F-16s.

That should speak for itself.
The_Burning_Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2005, 01:05 AM   #9 (permalink)
ajaybhutani
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-05-04
Posts: 2,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Insomniac
Okay guys I'm basing this off information of what the military aviation will be like in 2015. Assuming the technology that the US, Russia, China, and EU are testing becomes standard production use.

Russia: The Russians are currently experimenting with plasma stealth and claim that it makes their jets just as or more stealthy as an F/A-22A Raptor. All the Russian fighter jets radar signatures will be drastically reduced to almost nothing.

Russian weapons include the R-77, AA-11, and AA-12. All these are counterparts that are equal to the American AIM-120C and AIM-9X missiles.

Also experimenting with the Su-47A Berkut air-superiority fighter.
You forgot to include
1. PAK-Fa.
2. R77 M
3 KH172. (ultra long range missile ?)
4. Brahmos A2G . missile.
ajaybhutani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2005, 16:42 PM   #10 (permalink)
The_Burning_Kid
Contributor
 
The_Burning_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-07-05
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajaybhutani
You forgot to include
1. PAK-Fa.
2. R77 M
3 KH172. (ultra long range missile ?)
4. Brahmos A2G . missile.
For one thing, we can't compare PAK-FA for it isn't even real. There are no specs, drawings, or anything on it. So that would be a waste of time to put in there, if you ask me.
__________________
This message has brought to you by:

F-22 Kicks-A$$.com

*If you clicked that you fell for it :tongue:
The_Burning_Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2005, 21:42 PM   #11 (permalink)
BenRoethig
Senior Contributor
 
BenRoethig's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-03-04
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 1,035
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Insomniac
I just don't want any people that have no idea what "AMRAAM" stands for or, in general, don't know a thing about fighter jets getting on here and voting something random. I don't mean for the title to be offensive. It's only supposed to attract attention and well... it sure did the job.

I wanted to know if you guys still think the F/A-22A Raptor reigns supreme with all this new technology coming out. That's all.
Advanced Medium Range Air to Air Missile.
__________________
F/A-18E/F Super Hornet: The Honda Accord of fighters.
BenRoethig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2005, 22:35 PM   #12 (permalink)
ajaybhutani
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-05-04
Posts: 2,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Burning_Kid
For one thing, we can't compare PAK-FA for it isn't even real. There are no specs, drawings, or anything on it. So that would be a waste of time to put in there, if you ask me.
tobe frank whole of this thread is a pretty good waste of time.. are u sure u know all about any one of the aircrafts you have put in the list..
As far as PAK-FA is concerned the Mig1.44 and SU47( the ones u have mentioned here) were the tech demonstrators. And work on PAK-Fa is on. Neways how much is known about the J10 which is even in production. ??
ajaybhutani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2005, 23:11 PM   #13 (permalink)
The_Burning_Kid
Contributor
 
The_Burning_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-07-05
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajaybhutani
tobe frank whole of this thread is a pretty good waste of time.. are u sure u know all about any one of the aircrafts you have put in the list..
As far as PAK-FA is concerned the Mig1.44 and SU47( the ones u have mentioned here) were the tech demonstrators. And work on PAK-Fa is on. Neways how much is known about the J10 which is even in production. ??
But we don't know what tech it will imploy, what it will look like, etc.....
The_Burning_Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2005, 16:04 PM   #14 (permalink)
canoe
Military Professional
 
canoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-13-05
Posts: 698
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajaybhutani
tobe frank whole of this thread is a pretty good waste of time.. are u sure u know all about any one of the aircrafts you have put in the list..
As far as PAK-FA is concerned the Mig1.44 and SU47( the ones u have mentioned here) were the tech demonstrators. And work on PAK-Fa is on. Neways how much is known about the J10 which is even in production. ??
I think the point hes getting at is theres solid information about the other aircraft. We know the basic specs, we know what they look like and they arn't bull#$4 paper dreams because they have been built, flown and exist. And some people in the forum may have even had personal experience working with them.

As a general rule of thumb I usually won't even seriously talk about aircraft that arn't in service with anyone and won't be in service in the next 5-10 years. Everyone always has they're upcoming prototypes, but I never consider those to be actual combat aircraft until their on the production line. The reality is most prototypes and test beds never make it to the production stage.

Although I do agree this particular thread is a waste of time, its still possible to discuss real world aircraft in the forum.

Last edited by canoe : 11-12-2005 at 18:39 PM.
canoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 22:02 PM   #15 (permalink)
tphuang
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-05-05
Posts: 841
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajaybhutani
tobe frank whole of this thread is a pretty good waste of time.. are u sure u know all about any one of the aircrafts you have put in the list..
As far as PAK-FA is concerned the Mig1.44 and SU47( the ones u have mentioned here) were the tech demonstrators. And work on PAK-Fa is on. Neways how much is known about the J10 which is even in production. ??
J-10 is in service already. Mig 1.44 never had more than a prototype. PAK FA is still just getting into the wind tunnel stage.

As for the original posters, I have to beg your pardon here. China's future planes are all going to be Indigenous planes. J-11B is fully indigenous and I don't need to say anything about J-10.

Anyhow, as for the best plane. F-22, why are we still having conversations on this? It's like comparing a thoroughbred to a your average horse.
tphuang is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
F-22, stuff you should know Rusky Military Aviation 275 09-21-2007 01:19 AM
Your Thoughts on David Icke? joey2 World Affairs Board Pub 12 12-29-2006 07:55 AM
The Stuff of Life Leader Science & Tech 3 10-05-2005 16:46 PM
Soviet guns in Afghanistan (interview) troung Small Arms and Personal Weapons 44 08-30-2005 23:55 PM
Whatever This Guys Is "high" On, Its Good Stuff! visioninthedark International Defense Topics 4 10-18-2004 05:04 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8