![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
| View Poll Results: What's best? | |||
| F/A-22A Raptor |
|
47 | 71.21% |
| F/A-18E Super Hornet |
|
4 | 6.06% |
| JSF |
|
4 | 6.06% |
| EF-2000 |
|
2 | 3.03% |
| Su-47A Berkut |
|
9 | 13.64% |
| Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Banished
|
Only for people who know their stuff
Okay guys I'm basing this off information of what the military aviation will be like in 2015. Assuming the technology that the US, Russia, China, and EU are testing becomes standard production use.
Russia: The Russians are currently experimenting with plasma stealth and claim that it makes their jets just as or more stealthy as an F/A-22A Raptor. All the Russian fighter jets radar signatures will be drastically reduced to almost nothing. Russian weapons include the R-77, AA-11, and AA-12. All these are counterparts that are equal to the American AIM-120C and AIM-9X missiles. Also experimenting with the Su-47A Berkut air-superiority fighter. Lastly experimenting with helmet mounted sights. United States: Currently experimenting with technology similiar to plasma stealth, probably working around 2015. All the American fighter jet radar signatures will be reduced to nothing as well. Also experimenting with the new AIM-120D AMRAAM missile that is supposed to have a 50% increase in range (approx. 37-38 miles) and smaller escape envolope. Also experimentiing with AESA Radar for the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and a slightly weaker version for the F/A-22A Raptor. Lastly experimenting with the new Joint Strike Fighter and Joint helmet mounted cueing system. European Union: Currently helping US with JSF. Has Meteor missile with a range of 70-50 miles and very small escape envolope, probably upgrading it. China: Currently buying all weapons from Russia. Made J-10 Aircraft with perfomance level similiar to F-16C. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
HKHolic
Senior Contributor
|
R-77 and AA-12 are the same thing.
And I think we have about 20 of these threads saying the more or less the same thing.
__________________
"The right man in the wrong place can make all the difference in the world. So wake up, Mr. Freeman. Wake up and smell the ashes." G-Man Last edited by leib10 : 11-09-2005 at 13:14 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Banished
|
I just don't want any people that have no idea what "AMRAAM" stands for or, in general, don't know a thing about fighter jets getting on here and voting something random. I don't mean for the title to be offensive. It's only supposed to attract attention and well... it sure did the job.
I wanted to know if you guys still think the F/A-22A Raptor reigns supreme with all this new technology coming out. That's all. Last edited by Insomniac : 11-09-2005 at 22:35 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
1. PAK-Fa. 2. R77 M 3 KH172. (ultra long range missile ?) 4. Brahmos A2G . missile. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
__________________
This message has brought to you by: F-22 Kicks-A$$.com *If you clicked that you fell for it :tongue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
__________________
F/A-18E/F Super Hornet: The Honda Accord of fighters. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
As far as PAK-FA is concerned the Mig1.44 and SU47( the ones u have mentioned here) were the tech demonstrators. And work on PAK-Fa is on. Neways how much is known about the J10 which is even in production. ?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
As a general rule of thumb I usually won't even seriously talk about aircraft that arn't in service with anyone and won't be in service in the next 5-10 years. Everyone always has they're upcoming prototypes, but I never consider those to be actual combat aircraft until their on the production line. The reality is most prototypes and test beds never make it to the production stage. Although I do agree this particular thread is a waste of time, its still possible to discuss real world aircraft in the forum. Last edited by canoe : 11-12-2005 at 18:39 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
As for the original posters, I have to beg your pardon here. China's future planes are all going to be Indigenous planes. J-11B is fully indigenous and I don't need to say anything about J-10. Anyhow, as for the best plane. F-22, why are we still having conversations on this? It's like comparing a thoroughbred to a your average horse. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| F-22, stuff you should know | Rusky | Military Aviation | 275 | 09-21-2007 01:19 AM |
| Your Thoughts on David Icke? | joey2 | World Affairs Board Pub | 12 | 12-29-2006 07:55 AM |
| The Stuff of Life | Leader | Science & Tech | 3 | 10-05-2005 16:46 PM |
| Soviet guns in Afghanistan (interview) | troung | Small Arms and Personal Weapons | 44 | 08-30-2005 23:55 PM |
| Whatever This Guys Is "high" On, Its Good Stuff! | visioninthedark | International Defense Topics | 4 | 10-18-2004 05:04 AM |