2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
View Poll Results: Which is the best dedicated strike/ground attack aircrafT?
A-10 Warthog 61 48.80%
MiG-27 25 20.00%
SEPECAT Jaguar 8 6.40%
Mirage V 4 3.20%
Tornado Gr.4 27 21.60%
Voters: 125. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-06-2005, 23:52 PM   #1 (permalink)
SuperFlanker
Regular
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Posts: 106
Best Strike Aircraft

So, which aircraft do you guys feel is the best ground attack/strike aircraft?
SuperFlanker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2005, 09:20 AM   #2 (permalink)
Acer
New Member
 
Join Date: 10-07-05
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperFlanker
So, which aircraft do you guys feel is the best ground attack/strike aircraft?
A-10 (out of the above list)
Acer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2005, 09:31 AM   #3 (permalink)
tejas_mk
New Member
 
Join Date: 10-06-05
Posts: 11
Post

I'm an indian, and should have gone 4 Mig - 27 but as much as i have read about all the above listed aircrafts, i think A-10 is the best jaguar comes close. Dont know about rest. if anybody can specify which is best regarding technical specifications, i would like to hear it.
tejas_mk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2005, 10:03 AM   #4 (permalink)
JG73
Contributor
 
JG73's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: Germany
Posts: 484
Country:
Out of that list only A-10 and Tornado can compete. I've voted for Tornado because of it's uniquely terrain following radar that qualifies it to fly below enemies radar and because of it's SEAD properties (ECR).

But why are F-15E and F-117 not in the list???
And why Mirage V and not 2000???
JG73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2005, 12:12 PM   #5 (permalink)
SuperFlanker
Regular
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Posts: 106
F-15E and Mirage2000 are multirole fighters, not dedicated strike aircraft. The F-117 is more of a long range, high altitude bomber than a dedicated strike aircraft.
SuperFlanker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2005, 12:21 PM   #6 (permalink)
indianguy4u
Real Madrid CF
Senior Contributor
 
indianguy4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-07-05
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 3,213
Country:
IAF Jaguars did well in Alaska exercise some time back.
__________________
Hala Madrid!!
indianguy4u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2005, 21:53 PM   #7 (permalink)
JG73
Contributor
 
JG73's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: Germany
Posts: 484
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperFlanker
F-15E and Mirage2000 are multirole fighters, not dedicated strike aircraft.
F-15E is primarily a strike aircraft.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperFlanker
The F-117 is more of a long range, high altitude bomber...

That's the definition of a strike aircraft in my opinion. But to class F-117 is not really possible. Actualy it should be named A-117 not F-117.

Last edited by JG73 : 10-07-2005 at 22:01 PM.
JG73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2005, 22:04 PM   #8 (permalink)
JG73
Contributor
 
JG73's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: Germany
Posts: 484
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by indianguy4u
IAF Jaguars did well in Alaska exercise some time back.

There's a reason why RAF will replace all Jaguars while Tornado will stay in service.
JG73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2005, 04:17 AM   #9 (permalink)
Acer
New Member
 
Join Date: 10-07-05
Posts: 9
hmm, I dont see why Jaguars are on the list... they are pretty much inferior nowadays as strike aircraft...

maybe F-111 or B-1? lmao
Acer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2005, 12:59 PM   #10 (permalink)
The_Burning_Kid
Contributor
 
The_Burning_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-07-05
Posts: 444
I think you should have put the F-35 JSF on the poll.
The_Burning_Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2005, 17:15 PM   #11 (permalink)
raptor1992
Banished
 
raptor1992's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-21-05
Location: Curious about it aren't you? Sadly I won't be telling you. Look around the world!!!
Posts: 205
Send a message via MSN to raptor1992 Send a message via Yahoo to raptor1992
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Burning_Kid
I think you should have put the F-35 JSF on the poll.
we don't quite know the specs or actual capabilities of the JSF.
raptor1992 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2005, 18:36 PM   #12 (permalink)
SuperFlanker
Regular
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Posts: 106
All the aircraft i put on the list are in the same general class...they are used almost exclusively for air to ground attack and are usually used to give clsoe air supprot to ground troops. Things liek the F-111, F-117, B-1, etc. are long range high altitude bombers and things like the F-35, M2k and F-15E are multirole aircraft that can be used for A2A or A2G effectively.
SuperFlanker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2005, 20:25 PM   #13 (permalink)
JG73
Contributor
 
JG73's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Location: Germany
Posts: 484
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperFlanker
Things liek the F-111, F-117, B-1, etc. are long range high altitude bombers
F-111 was made to intrude adverse airspace in low level flight for not to bee seen by radar. Just like the Tornado. By the way: F-111 isn't in service anymore.
F-117's range isn't very impressiv only about 1500km. Also airforce-technology.com classifies it clear as a ground attack aircraft. B-1, B-2, B-52 are long range high altitude Bombers. Otherwise it hadn't been downed by a SA-3 during Kosovo war.


Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperFlanker
...and things like the F-35, M2k and F-15E are multirole aircraft that can be used for A2A or A2G effectively.

Even though F-15E's air to ground capabilities are much better than Jaguar's, MiG-27's or Mirage's.
JG73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2005, 22:54 PM   #14 (permalink)
B.Smitty
Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-15-05
Location: Oak Hill, VA
Posts: 549
Of that unimpressive list, the Tornado is the best by a good margin.

The Mig-27 suffers from the wonders of Russian electronics and is singularly unimpressive in the munitions department.

The A-10 is slow and wheezy and only now becoming more than a fair weather CAS aircraft.

The Jaguar has had a good run, but is sorely outdated.

The combination of TIALD, Storm Shadow, Brimstone, Paveway 4, and Alarm/HARM give the Gr4 a decent weapons selection.

Other than a decent SAR/GMTI radar (AFAIK), the Tornado is a capable strike aircraft.

Last edited by B.Smitty : 10-09-2005 at 10:07 AM.
B.Smitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2005, 23:36 PM   #15 (permalink)
Sanctified
New Member
 
Join Date: 07-02-05
Posts: 23
Why wasn't the Su-25T(Su-39) Frogfoot included?
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/row/su-25.htm
Sanctified is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LCA beats F-16 Mr_Vastu Military Aviation 136 08-08-2007 03:57 AM
Favorite Naval Book(s) RAL's_pal? Naval Forces 62 02-09-2007 04:46 AM
Who needs the USN? rickusn Naval Forces 10 07-05-2005 00:47 AM
World Naval Rankings rickusn Naval Forces 66 03-04-2005 01:11 AM
This is what exactly happened on 9/11 Leader Political Discussions 0 06-17-2004 20:48 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8