![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
| View Poll Results: Which is the best dedicated strike/ground attack aircrafT? | |||
| A-10 Warthog |
|
61 | 48.80% |
| MiG-27 |
|
25 | 20.00% |
| SEPECAT Jaguar |
|
8 | 6.40% |
| Mirage V |
|
4 | 3.20% |
| Tornado Gr.4 |
|
27 | 21.60% |
| Voters: 125. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
New Member
|
I'm an indian, and should have gone 4 Mig - 27 but as much as i have read about all the above listed aircrafts, i think A-10 is the best jaguar comes close. Dont know about rest. if anybody can specify which is best regarding technical specifications,
i would like to hear it. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
|
Out of that list only A-10 and Tornado can compete. I've voted for Tornado because of it's uniquely terrain following radar that qualifies it to fly below enemies radar and because of it's SEAD properties (ECR).
But why are F-15E and F-117 not in the list??? And why Mirage V and not 2000??? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | ||
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
Quote:
That's the definition of a strike aircraft in my opinion. But to class F-117 is not really possible. Actualy it should be named A-117 not F-117. Last edited by JG73 : 10-07-2005 at 22:01 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
Join Date: 06-21-05
Location: Curious about it aren't you? Sadly I won't be telling you. Look around the world!!!
Posts: 205
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
All the aircraft i put on the list are in the same general class...they are used almost exclusively for air to ground attack and are usually used to give clsoe air supprot to ground troops. Things liek the F-111, F-117, B-1, etc. are long range high altitude bombers and things like the F-35, M2k and F-15E are multirole aircraft that can be used for A2A or A2G effectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | ||
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
F-117's range isn't very impressiv only about 1500km. Also airforce-technology.com classifies it clear as a ground attack aircraft. B-1, B-2, B-52 are long range high altitude Bombers. Otherwise it hadn't been downed by a SA-3 during Kosovo war. Quote:
Even though F-15E's air to ground capabilities are much better than Jaguar's, MiG-27's or Mirage's. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
|
Of that unimpressive list, the Tornado is the best by a good margin.
The Mig-27 suffers from the wonders of Russian electronics and is singularly unimpressive in the munitions department. The A-10 is slow and wheezy and only now becoming more than a fair weather CAS aircraft. The Jaguar has had a good run, but is sorely outdated. The combination of TIALD, Storm Shadow, Brimstone, Paveway 4, and Alarm/HARM give the Gr4 a decent weapons selection. Other than a decent SAR/GMTI radar (AFAIK), the Tornado is a capable strike aircraft. Last edited by B.Smitty : 10-09-2005 at 10:07 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
New Member
|
Why wasn't the Su-25T(Su-39) Frogfoot included?
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/row/su-25.htm |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LCA beats F-16 | Mr_Vastu | Military Aviation | 136 | 08-08-2007 03:57 AM |
| Favorite Naval Book(s) | RAL's_pal? | Naval Forces | 62 | 02-09-2007 04:46 AM |
| Who needs the USN? | rickusn | Naval Forces | 10 | 07-05-2005 00:47 AM |
| World Naval Rankings | rickusn | Naval Forces | 66 | 03-04-2005 01:11 AM |
| This is what exactly happened on 9/11 | Leader | Political Discussions | 0 | 06-17-2004 20:48 PM |