2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
View Poll Results: Which is the best dedicated strike/ground attack aircrafT?
A-10 Warthog 68 48.57%
MiG-27 25 17.86%
SEPECAT Jaguar 11 7.86%
Mirage V 5 3.57%
Tornado Gr.4 31 22.14%
Voters: 140. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-29-2006, 05:15 AM   #136 (permalink)
Garry
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 06-18-04
Posts: 1,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wraith601
Is the F-15SG a multirole fighter like the F-15E, or does it favor strike or air superiority?
As far as I understood F-15SG is a version close to F-15K. Jgetti would be more competent to reply.

However I now understand that F-15SG does not have any advantage in terms of engine efficiency nor payload over Su-34. Twist was in CFT fuel.

Su-34 and F-15SG are very close in terms of TOTAL PAYLOAD (Su-34 has slighly more), while F-15SG has 2,000 higher TOTAL PAYLOAD than MKI, and less than Su-35 prototype. That is because MKI has large amount of steel parts while F-15SG has larger share made of titanium, while Su-32/34 and Su-35 which were redesigned in mid-1990-es have larger share of titanium.

OK. Back to the issue. Su-34 has INTERNAL fuel of 11800kg and can cary another 2,000 in drop tanks. F-15SG carries 6000kg INTERNALLY and UP TO 3000kg in CFT (this figure is given by my source - Canoe stated up to 9818 kg in CFT). If this figures correct => Su-34 has more internal fuel than F-15SG has internal + CFT.

When Snipe pointed 12 tons combat load this assumed F-15SG having NO CFT and only part of its internal fuel => extremelly low range/radius. CFT installed combat load should be much lower.

So, this aircraft are actually match in basic load/range parameters but SG has HIGHER flexibility in this trade off. It can vary its weapon load UP TO 12tons, against 8 tons in Su-34. It has LESS maximum fuel load comared to Su-34 which can have total fuel of almost 14tons (with drop tanks).

In terms of engines..... I know so few that would be interested to hear your oppinion on AL-31F vs GE-F110-200

ps. Jgetty please correct me if I made wrong statemets or mistakes!
Garry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2006, 11:22 AM   #137 (permalink)
jgetti
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 12-07-04
Posts: 406
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wraith601
Is the F-15SG a multirole fighter like the F-15E, or does it favor strike or air superiority?
All E variants are multi-role aircraft.

Internal fuel is 5952kg, and external fuel totals 9818 kg (4423kg in CFT's and 5395 kg in drop tanks).
jgetti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2006, 11:50 AM   #138 (permalink)
Johnekgun
Regular
 
Join Date: 07-02-05
Location: Booneville, Mississippi
Posts: 64
Send a message via Yahoo to Johnekgun
Why no scooters ?

The A-4 was a pretty good strike platform in its day. It is still in use by two navies that I can remember off the top of my head. Its been said it could carry its wieght in bombs. I am not sure about that but it surely carried alot of bombs ( both smart and dumb varieties ) for such a light aircraft.

The A-1 Skyraider outlined in design by the same man that led the design team for the A-4 Skyhawk was also a pretty good strike platform for a prop job.
Johnekgun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2006, 11:53 AM   #139 (permalink)
Garry
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 06-18-04
Posts: 1,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by jgetti
All E variants are multi-role aircraft.

Internal fuel is 5952kg, and external fuel totals 9818 kg (4423kg in CFT's and 5395 kg in drop tanks).
Then F-15SG would have more MAXIMUM FUEL and MAXIMUM LOAD giving wider trade off.

Su-34 TOTAL MAXIMUM fuel is 13800 kg = (INTERNAL 11800 + DROP tanks 2000)

F-15SG TOTAL MAXIMUM fuel is 15770 kg = (INTERNAL 5352+ CFT 4423+ DROP tanks 5395)

Engines are comparable in terms of fuel efficiency. So it is matter of fuel loaded instead of weapons.

Hence in line with above the two are a match for range/load parameters, with F-15 having wider range in fuel vs load tradeoff.

Is it now objective estimation on this two parameters?
Garry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2006, 13:20 PM   #140 (permalink)
Zaphael
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 05-19-06
Location: Singapore
Posts: 203
Country:
Frankly speaking, i would never pick the Su-34 over the F-15SG no matter what u say. The aircraft we operate are majority from USA or NATO, hence all our weapons and technologies were to be integrated with all our aircraft that way.

There is no way we could load a JDAM, or even AMRAAM on the Su-34. Acquiring an Su would be stabbing ourselves in our logistics operations for the airforce. And its the logistics that keep our a/c in the air.

So as far as I'm concerned, the F-15SG is the best strike fighter.
Zaphael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2006, 18:08 PM   #141 (permalink)
SRB
Contributor
 
SRB's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-19-06
Location: Belgrade
Posts: 414
Country:
If there is in poll A-10 where is Su-25 or upgrade version Su-39 which is today best CAS plane in world especially because A-10 is not longer in production.
If Su-39 use DU rounds it can be good tank buster but it is guided missile tank buster.
Simple if there is A-10 than there must be Su-39 .
SRB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2006, 02:00 AM   #142 (permalink)
Garry
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 06-18-04
Posts: 1,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zaphael
Frankly speaking, i would never pick the Su-34 over the F-15SG no matter what u say. The aircraft we operate are majority from USA or NATO, hence all our weapons and technologies were to be integrated with all our aircraft that way.

There is no way we could load a JDAM, or even AMRAAM on the Su-34. Acquiring an Su would be stabbing ourselves in our logistics operations for the airforce. And its the logistics that keep our a/c in the air.

So as far as I'm concerned, the F-15SG is the best strike fighter.
Yes, that is why F-15SG was priced twice more. Once you get yourself a strategic supplier switching cost becomes too high.... hence this strategic supplier can price you up. Moreover.... US would support Singapore in case of agression while Russia would be just happy to sell weapons to both Singapore and Malaisia.
Garry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2006, 05:26 AM   #143 (permalink)
usplanefan67
Regular
 
Join Date: 07-18-06
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Burning_Kid
I think you should have put the F-35 JSF on the poll.
I think he was shooting for aircraft in service

A-10 above all else..
usplanefan67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2006, 11:04 AM   #144 (permalink)
Captain Drunk
Banished
 
Captain Drunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-02-06
Location: Goa, India
Posts: 825
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRB
Simple if there is A-10 than there must be Su-39 .
The Yak 141 would be better than them both.
Captain Drunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2006, 11:55 AM   #145 (permalink)
FORCEXXI
New Member
 
Join Date: 06-26-06
Posts: 9
Out of that list, easily the A-10. A nice GAU-8 cannon, and JDAM capability. Carries full-sprectrum of weapons.

I am quite surprised the F-15E wasn't mentioned. The F-15E is probably the better strike aircraft out of all of them.
FORCEXXI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2006, 11:59 AM   #146 (permalink)
master_fx
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-15-06
Posts: 30
Tornado Gr.4!
__________________
Global Defense Forum
master_fx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2006, 17:50 PM   #147 (permalink)
PubFather
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 04-25-06
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 1,198
Country:
Are you insane?? GR4 is a decent bird but by no means anything special - its a medicore bomb truck these days - due to the conversion from low-level penetrator to medium level bomber....
__________________
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit - Scottish Motto

"They that approve a private opinion, call it opinion; but they that dislike it, heresy; and yet heresy signifies no more than private opinion” Thomas Hobbes - Leviathan

PubFather is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2006, 03:11 AM   #148 (permalink)
usplanefan67
Regular
 
Join Date: 07-18-06
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by PubFather
Are you insane?? GR4 is a decent bird but by no means anything special - its a medicore bomb truck these days - due to the conversion from low-level penetrator to medium level bomber....

I may sound stupid but whats a GR4???
usplanefan67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2006, 12:53 PM   #149 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
A Tornado IDS.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2006, 00:56 AM   #150 (permalink)
troung
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
 
troung's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 4,304
Country:
Quote:
A-10 Warthog, MiG-27, SEPECAT Jaguar, Mirage V, Tornado Gr.4
Sorta apples and oranges with the MiG-27, Jaguar and Mirage-5 being more in the same class then the A-10 and Tornado.

But hell the A-10 is the best. It is not fair to class the others with the A-10.
__________________
To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway
troung is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
This is what exactly happened on 9/11 Leader Political Discussions 6 Today 17:11 PM
WAR SCENARIO-INDIA vs PAKISTAN vishv29 South Asian Defense Topics 51 10-18-2006 11:58 AM
Light Combat Aircraft(lCA) and Combat Aircraft Trainer(CAT) Proud Indian Military Aviation 146 03-19-2006 12:34 PM
JSF vs Rafale vs EF-2000 indianguy4u Military Aviation 7 08-29-2005 04:33 AM
IAF purchasing more and more. ajaybhutani South Asian Defense Topics 54 04-20-2005 09:05 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:41 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8