2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-13-2005, 18:45 PM   #1 (permalink)
SwingKid
Regular
 
Join Date: 01-28-05
Posts: 62
RWR mistakes Patriot?

Here's a controversial topic. In March 2003, an F-16CJ fired a HARM at a friendly Patriot SAM site:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in601241.shtml

What do you think happened?

(a) The F-16CJ's RWR incorrectly identified the Patriot as a threat,
(b) the Patriot incorrectly identified the F-16CJ as a threat, and its preparations to fire were detected by the F-16CJ RWR, or
(c) the pilot misread the RWR and actively fired on a firendly?

Note that according to some sources, (b) should be impossible...

-SK
SwingKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 00:15 AM   #2 (permalink)
tphuang
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-05-05
Posts: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by SwingKid
Here's a controversial topic. In March 2003, an F-16CJ fired a HARM at a friendly Patriot SAM site:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in601241.shtml

What do you think happened?

(a) The F-16CJ's RWR incorrectly identified the Patriot as a threat,
(b) the Patriot incorrectly identified the F-16CJ as a threat, and its preparations to fire were detected by the F-16CJ RWR, or
(c) the pilot misread the RWR and actively fired on a firendly?

Note that according to some sources, (b) should be impossible...

-SK
It's Patriot missiles problem. Remember, this is the same missile that shot down a British plane in the same war. As I have said many times, Patriot missiles == overrated.
tphuang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 01:57 AM   #3 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
What makes them overrated?

The fact that they can hit even NATO planes with western ECM operating on combat footing, or the fact that they hit SRBMs(granted hitting is not the same as destroying) almost 85% of the time in actual combat situations?

Either way, that's my kind of 'overrated'.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 05:50 AM   #4 (permalink)
SloMax
Contributor
 
SloMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-05-05
Location: EU
Posts: 303
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
What makes them overrated?

The fact that they can hit even NATO planes with western ECM operating on combat footing, or the fact that they hit SRBMs(granted hitting is not the same as destroying) almost 85% of the time in actual combat situations?

Either way, that's my kind of 'overrated'.
I read for every SRBMs hit, three patriot missiles were needed. The problem of patriot system is its autonomy. It can fire missiles automatically and when it is fixed on something it is very hard for the operator to prevent firing. In tornado GR4 case in 2003 it has mistaken it for a SRBMs (?!). In an exercise in 2000 patriot system was at a least minute prevented from firing on a formation of 4 F-16 that it has mistaken for incoming SRBMs. It has a lot of glitches, but they can be reappeared with system upgrade or replacement (money is the big question). But the US has nothing to worry about they will get a real SRBM killer soon - THAAD.
SloMax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 18:58 PM   #5 (permalink)
tphuang
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-05-05
Posts: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
What makes them overrated?

The fact that they can hit even NATO planes with western ECM operating on combat footing, or the fact that they hit SRBMs(granted hitting is not the same as destroying) almost 85% of the time in actual combat situations?

Either way, that's my kind of 'overrated'.
overrated against missiles. They were built for air defense and Raytheon is trying to convert it into a missile defense system. And then claim that it can shoot down missiles accurately.
tphuang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 20:58 PM   #6 (permalink)
TheGreenSmoke
Regular
 
Join Date: 05-16-05
Posts: 114
Country:
Quote:
overrated against missiles. They were built for air defense and Raytheon is trying to convert it into a missile defense system. And then claim that it can shoot down missiles accurately.
That is why they developed the PAC-3.
TheGreenSmoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 22:30 PM   #7 (permalink)
tphuang
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-05-05
Posts: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnakePlisken
That is why they developed the PAC-3.
They are basing it on an existing system that's flawed. All of the software used in developing these BMD systems use some form the predator/prey logic. When you face missiles with random movements, you just can't defend them. If anything operation iraqi freedom taught me, it's that Raytheon's software is still not up to par.
tphuang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2005, 00:23 AM   #8 (permalink)
TheGreenSmoke
Regular
 
Join Date: 05-16-05
Posts: 114
Country:
I think the PAC-3 has already shot down several missiles in OIF.
TheGreenSmoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2005, 01:25 AM   #9 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
"When you face missiles with random movements, you just can't defend them."

SRBMs do not have erratic movements, and i'll betya a buck that the Tornado didn't just fly straight and level with it's RWR going off as the Patriot slammed into it.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2005, 01:32 AM   #10 (permalink)
TheGreenSmoke
Regular
 
Join Date: 05-16-05
Posts: 114
Country:
Was it a PAC-2 or 3 that destroyed the tornado?

Last edited by TheGreenSmoke : 09-15-2005 at 20:23 PM.
TheGreenSmoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2005, 01:50 AM   #11 (permalink)
lemontree
Bandaid
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-04-04
Location: India
Posts: 5,928
The bright side of these incidents is that if India buys the Patriot system, it should detect a PAF F-16 as an enemy and not a friend. It would be desastrous for us if it detected the PAF F-16 as a friendly aircraft.
__________________

Cheers!...on the rocks!!
lemontree is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bush Orders Domestic Spying. Bulgaroctonus Political Discussions 191 02-23-2008 12:08 PM
Official admits mistakes in Timor troung International Defense Topics 0 08-11-2006 01:59 AM
US officials brief Indian team on Patriot missile system Ray South Asian Defense Topics 2 09-13-2005 03:00 AM
Arrow II vs. Patriot PAC-2 Rani Lakshmibai Military Aviation 9 05-19-2005 04:22 AM
Taiwan 2nd Patriot test successful Stoner International Defense Topics 7 10-31-2004 10:59 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:37 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8