SU 30MKI Vs Rafale - Page 3

Tronic · 10-14-2007, 00:22 AM

lol... aha!

btw, luv the stealthy Fokker..

Versus · 10-15-2007, 13:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shamus

Yah Archer but Versus made it worthwhile with his revealing of the super secret Super X-1000

.

Well ladies and gentleman, as you all know the increasing need for protection and security has created need for new weapons which will be able to meet future threats. Stealth concept is the way to go, when it comes to dealing with future threats. It offers considerable advantages over existing designs since it is invisible to radar and infra red means of detection, actual shape of the aircraft and it's aerodynamics are no longer needed. Our prototype of stealth aircraft with triple wings is proved to be successful during the test flights. Unfortunately
due to the high costs of development price of this specific integrated system will be high. The high price of this aircraft forced us to develop a new and cheaper solution for our customers.
Behold as we are presenting today a brand new cheap-but-stealth aircraft.

Ladies and gentleman the Super X-999.99 is here.

Shamus · 10-15-2007, 13:38 PM

You know Versus,I don't mean to burst your balloon here but.....

.

Versus · 10-15-2007, 15:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shamus

You know Versus,I don't mean to burst your balloon here but.....

.

Ha,thought of that....it has self sealing cover and self blowing compressor, so as soon it gets penetrated it blows and viola it flies again...

ok, I'll be serious from now on...buhahahahahha, yeah right

Feanor · 10-15-2007, 16:14 PM

Versus · 10-15-2007, 16:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Feanor

[img]http://home.satx.rr.com/gregron/forum-necromanc
y!.jpg[/img]

The night of the living forums

Francois · 10-16-2007, 08:25 AM

I fail to see how an aircraft that is basically a 30 years old airframe with a patchwork of sensors and systems forced to "work" together compares with one that has all its systems designed since the beginning to be integrated in the same optic?
I fail to see.

Jimmy · 10-16-2007, 19:04 PM

The balloon airframe is much more than 30 years old.

Archer · 10-16-2007, 22:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers

Archer,

You're on this thread ...

Thats why I said "the others get a pass". We are just attending the wake. We are decent law abiding folks not into necrophilia and stuff like that..

**Officer of Engineers** · 10-16-2007, 23:32 PM

Archer,

I wonder about you. You have a knack of digging the minute details of any weapon system ... what's scary is your more obvious skill at digging up these perverted sexual practices. The Pakistani all Female Repulsion Force comes to mind ... and I rather not have that.

Feanor · 10-16-2007, 23:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Francois

I fail to see how an aircraft that is basically a 30 years old airframe with a patchwork of sensors and systems forced to "work" together compares with one that has all its systems designed since the beginning to be integrated in the same optic?
I fail to see.

Su-30MK is not quite the same as a regular Flanker. You might want to compare the two in more detail.

Francois · 10-17-2007, 19:35 PM

I said the airframe is basically the same, and it just is!

10-14-2007, 00:22 AM	#31 (permalink)
Tronic Navajo Code Talker *Senior Contributor* Join Date: 12-27-04 Location: Patiala, India Posts: 5,288 Country:	lol... aha! btw, luv the stealthy Fokker.. __________________ *Nabha Sparasham Deeptam* *-Touch The Sky With Glory*

10-15-2007, 13:38 PM	#33 (permalink)
Shamus WAB Court Jester *Senior Contributor* Join Date: 04-12-07 Location: Michigan Posts: 2,072 Country:	You know Versus,I don't mean to burst your balloon here but..... . __________________ A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.

10-16-2007, 23:32 PM	#40 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers *Military Professional* Moderator Scotch taster Join Date: 08-06-03 Posts: 15,915 Country:	Archer, I wonder about you. You have a knack of digging the minute details of any weapon system ... what's scary is your more obvious skill at digging up these perverted sexual practices. The Pakistani all Female Repulsion Force comes to mind ... and I rather not have that. __________________ Chimo

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Typhoon V Rafale	PubFather	Military Aviation	26	12-14-2006 15:25 PM
isreali airforce vs french airforce	vishv29	Military Aviation	29	01-03-2006 12:09 PM
JSF vs Rafale vs EF-2000	indianguy4u	Military Aviation	7	08-29-2005 04:33 AM
SU 30MKI Vs Rafale	uss	Military Aviation	29	08-03-2005 00:18 AM
Which AC should India consider?	indianguy4u	South Asian Defense Topics	19	06-21-2005 16:22 PM

10-15-2007, 16:14 PM	#35 (permalink)
Feanor Banished Join Date: 06-12-07 Location: San Jose, CA Posts: 2,385 Country:

10-16-2007, 08:25 AM	#37 (permalink)
Francois *Defense Professional* Join Date: 08-18-05 Posts: 129	I fail to see how an aircraft that is basically a 30 years old airframe with a patchwork of sensors and systems forced to "work" together compares with one that has all its systems designed since the beginning to be integrated in the same optic? I fail to see.

10-16-2007, 19:04 PM	#38 (permalink)
Jimmy *Military Professional* Join Date: 11-16-05 Posts: 930 Country:	The balloon airframe is much more than 30 years old.

10-17-2007, 19:35 PM	#42 (permalink)
Francois *Defense Professional* Join Date: 08-18-05 Posts: 129	I said the airframe is basically the same, and it just is!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)