Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 77
Like Tree13Likes

Thread: More F-22 problems

  1. #1
    Resident Curmudgeon Military Professional Gun Grape's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 Mar 05
    Location
    Panama City Fl
    Posts
    6,698

    More F-22 problems

    Its not a good sign when pilots, even a small number, refuse to fly due to safety concerns.

    Especially with such a prestige plane

    http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/fighte...1#.T6m_rutYuuY

    Fighter Pilots Claim Intimidation Over F-22 Raptor Jets
    By LEE FERRAN and MEGAN CHUCHMACH
    May 7, 2012 —
    go.com
    Two F-22 Raptor pilots have said publicly that not only are they afraid to fly the most expensive fighter jets in American history, but the military has attempted to silence them and other F-22 pilots by threatening their careers.

    "There have been squadrons that have stood down over concerns. And there's been threat of reprisals," F-22 pilot Josh Wilson told CBS News' "60 Minutes" Sunday. "There's been threat of flying evaluation boards clipping our wings and doing ground jobs. And... in my case, potentially getting booted out of the Air Force.

    "So right now there's an example being set of, 'Hey, if you speak up about safety, you're going to be out of the organization,'" Wilson said.

    Despite the Air Force's glowing descriptions of the next-generation jet as America's future of air dominance, as an ABC News "Nightline" investigation broadcast last week found, unknown problems with the plane's oxygen system have already contributed to the death of one pilot, the near-death of another and mid-air scares for dozens more.

    READ Exclusive: Family Demands Truth in Air Force F-22 Pilot's Death

    Wilson and fellow F-22 pilot Jeremy Gordon, both veteran fighter pilots for the Virginia Air National Guard who came forward under whistleblower protection from Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R.-Ill.), have asked not to fly the F-22 anymore, according to CBS News, citing their concerns with the oxygen problem.

    Gordon said that two weeks after he requested not to fly the jet, he was called before a board of officers.

    "I was asked to make a decision that day whether I wanted to fly or find another line of work," he said.

    Several current and former F-22 pilots contacted by ABC News for its investigation either did not respond or quickly declined to comment on the plane and two relatives of flyers told ABC News that the pilots had been instructed not to speak to the media on penalty of potentially losing their post with the F-22 -- a coveted position despite the safety concerns. One pilot, when initially contacted by ABC News for comment, agreed to speak on the record but only after he checked with the Air Force public affairs office. Since then, the pilot has not responded to any of ABC News' attempts to communicate.

    Air Force spokesperson John Dorrian told ABC News he has no information about any pilots being explicitly told not to speak to the media about the Raptor and noted that several F-22 pilots have been made available to the press at Air Force events. Dorrian did say that if a member of the Air Force wishes to speak with the media as a representative of the Air Force, that engagement is conducted through the Air Force public affairs office, but whistleblowers are still protected.

    "Corporately, the Air Force position is the Air Force is not going to tolerate any reprisal actions against whistleblowers," Dorrian said.

    Since Wilson and Gordon are assigned to the Virginia Air National Guard, Dorrian said he did not have specific information on their case.

    Col. Thomas Wark, commander of the Virginia Air National Guard's 192nd Fighter Wing at Langley Air Force Base, told ABC News that while it would be inappropriate to discuss personnel actions, the Guard "is fully aware and supports the rights of military members under the Military Whistleblowers Act and would not consider using disciplinary actions as a means of reprisal."

    Top officials at the Air Force and Lockheed Martin refused to take part in one-on-one interviews with ABC News for its broadcast report, but the Air Force provided a statement last week in which it says the service is committed to "unparalleled dedication to flight safety."

    "Flying America's premier fighter aircraft always entails risk but the Air Force has, and always will, take every measure to ensure the safety of our aircrews while delivering air superiority for the nation," the statement said. The Air Force has also stressed that reports of "hypoxia-like symptoms" are exceedingly rare -- more than two dozen compared to the thousands of flights flown without incident.

    READ: Air Force's Full Statement in Response to ABC News Investigation

    Last week the Air Force officially received the last F-22 Raptor from defense contracting giant Lockheed Martin, completing an order of 187 planes that cost U.S. taxpayers an estimated $79 billion -- meaning that including research, development and production among other costs, each plane has a price tag of more than $420 million. Despite being the most advanced fighters on the planet, none of the planes have been used on a combat mission since they went combat-ready in late 2005. Critics told ABC News that's because the jet was designed to fight rival, sophisticated fighters – an enemy that doesn't exist right now.

    READ: Final F-22 Delivered, McCain Says $79B Jets Still Have No Mission

    F-22 Pilot Blamed in Fatal Crash After Plane Malfunction

    Capt. Jeff Haney was flying the Air Force's next-generation stealth F-22 Raptor on a routine training mission in Alaska in November 2010 when a sudden malfunction cut off his oxygen completely. Capt. Haney never made a distress call but took his plane into a dive and, a little over a minute later, crashed into the winter wilderness at faster than the speed of sound.

    After a lengthy investigation, an Air Force Accident Investigation Board could not find the cause of the malfunction but determined "by clear and convincing evidence" that in addition to other factors, Haney was to blame for the crash because he was too distracted by his inability to breathe to fly the plane properly.

    READ: Air Force's Accident Investigation Board Report (PDF)

    But Haney's sister, Jennifer, told ABC News in an exclusive interview she believes her brother blacked out trying to save himself and said that by blaming him, the Air Force was attempting to deflect attention from the ongoing, mysterious oxygen problem with the costly planes.

    "I don't agree with [the Air Force]. I think there was a lot more going on inside that cockpit," Jennifer Haney said. "A cover-up? I don't know. But there's something."

    In at least 25 cases since 2008, F-22 pilots have reported experiencing "hypoxia-like symptoms" in mid-air, according to the Air Force. Last year the Air Force grounded the full fleet of F-22s for nearly five months to investigate, but still no one knows what is going wrong, even as the planes are back in the air. Hypoxia is caused by a lack of oxygen to the brain and is characterized by dizziness, confusion, lack of judgment and, eventually, unconsciousness.

    In one case before the grounding, a pilot became so disoriented that his plane dropped down and skimmed treetops before he managed to save himself and return to base, an Air Force spokesperson told ABC News. Presumably speaking of the same incident, Gordon told "60 Minutes" the pilot had to be told he had hit the trees -- he didn't remember doing it himself.

    Wilson described experiencing apparent hypoxia while in the cockpit as a "surreal experience" and Gordon said the onset is "insidious."

    "Some pilots will go the entire mission, land and not know anything went wrong," Gordon said.

    To Jennifer Haney, every time an F-22 goes up, it's risking the life of its pilot. She spoke to ABC News because she said she couldn't stand to see another family go through what hers had.

    "I know that the Air Force has said that they were very proud to have Jeff and are very sorry for our loss -- well then, in Jeff's name, fix this," she said. "We want to make sure Jeff did not die in vain -- that his death will mean something and that if it saves lives of pilots now, future pilots, then he died for the greater good or something."

    The Air Force has already begun to enact changes to the jet in hopes of mitigating the oxygen problem, including adding pilot-monitoring equipment and improving the emergency oxygen system.

    But for all their effort, the Air Force still doesn't have what Jennifer Haney said is most important both to her family and to the families of pilots that risk their lives every day at the controls of the F-22: answers.

    "I believe Jeff deserves that. That was my baby brother and I believe he deserves that. He deserves the truth to be told as to what happened. Not anybody's guesses," she said. "He deserves the truth. He deserves honor and so do his little girls."
    F-22 Fighter Whistleblowers ‘Fully Protected’: Air Force - ABC News

    By Lee Ferran
    May 8, 2012 5:41pm
    F-22 Fighter Whistleblowers ‘Fully Protected’: Air Force


    The two F-22 pilots who decided to speak out publicly about a mysterious, potentially deadly problem with America’s most expensive fighter jet, the F-22 Raptor, are “fully protected” and others will not be reprimanded for asking not to fly the planes, a top Air Force official said today.

    The Raptor, the U.S.’s only operational next-generation stealth fighter, has suffered at least 25 incidents since 2008 in which its pilots experienced “hypoxia-like symptoms” including dizziness, disorientation and nausea in mid-air. One pilot became so disoriented that his plane dropped down and skimmed treetops before he managed to pull up and save himself. Another pilot’s plane suffered a catastrophic malfunction that shut off his oxygen system, leaving him to experience what the Air Force called a “sense similar to suffocation” in the minute before his fatal crash into the Alaskan wilderness during a November 2010 training mission, as reported in a recent ABC News “Nightline” investigation.

    Over the weekend, two F-22 pilots spoke out to CBS News’ “60 Minutes” about their concerns with flying the F-22 and claimed that the Air Force had sent a message to pilots that “if you speak up about safety, you’re going to be out of the organization,” as one of the pilots put it. Before the CBS report, a top Air Force official said that a “very small” number of F-22 airmen had asked not to fly the $420 million-a-pop planes, citing safety concerns.

    Testifying before a Senate Armed Services subcommittee hearing, Air Force Lt. Gen. Janet Wolfenbarger said that the two pilots who spoke out, along with any pilots who express reservations about flying the planes, will not be reprimanded.
    “There is clearly whistleblower protection,” Wolfenbarger said. “They are fully protected.”
    The Military Whistleblower Protection Act allows for members of the armed forces to contact members of Congress, Inspectors General, law enforcement organizations and other regulating bodies concerning any number of potential legal or regulatory violations including threats to public safety. The two pilots who spoke to “60 Minutes” did so in the presence of Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R.-Ill.) in order to be afforded protection under the act.

    Col. Thomas Wark, commander of the Virginia Air National Guard’s 192nd Fighter Wing under which the two pilots fly, told ABC News Monday the Guard would “not consider using disciplinary action as a means of reprisal.”


    Air Force Commander to Hop in F-22 Cockpit
    The Air Force has launched multiple investigations into finding the root cause of the mystery oxygen problem – including a nearly five-month fleet-wide grounding last year – but has so far come up blank. Wolfenbarger said today the Air Force believes there are two possibilities: either the pilots are breathing in toxins along with their oxygen, or they’re simply not getting enough oxygen. The incidents are exceedingly rare, the Air Force said, 25 cases compared to thousands of missions flown without incident.

    After a half decade since the first reported incidents, Wolfenbarger said the Air Force is “starting to believe we’re coming close to closure” on the cause but did not provide any more details.

    Still, the Air Force maintains that the planes are safe enough to fly and, following the “Nightline” and “60 Minutes” reports, the Air Force’s Air Combat Command head Gen. Mike Hostage said he’ll soon be jumping in the cockpit himself.

    “I’m asking these guys to assume some risk that’s over and above what everybody else is assuming, and I don’t feel like it’s right that I ask them to do it and then I’m not willing to do it myself – that’s not fair,” he said.
    Its called Tourist Season. So why can't we shoot them?

  2. #2
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    16 Nov 05
    Posts
    2,038
    This is two ANG pilots trying to shame the AF into fixing this. Interesting way to do it.

    The Raptor guys I've talked to roll their eyes a little at the whole thing. Is there a problem? Yes. Is the risk being mitigated at the local level? Yes. Is the media all over this thing because they're awful at their jobs? Yes.
    TopHatter and Stitch like this.

  3. #3
    Battleship Enthusiast Defense Professional USSWisconsin's Avatar
    Join Date
    05 Dec 08
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    5,425
    Here's my take on their numbers: 187 planes - 25 incidents - that infers 13.4% of the total aircraft were put at risk of loss - that is not insignificant in terms of potential force reduction - if a fighting force takes 13% losses - how effective would it be afterwards? In a battle, perhaps 13% losses are a realistic cost, but when its due to a life support malfuction - its not acceptable, IMO.
    Last edited by USSWisconsin; 09 May 12, at 16:52.
    "If your plan is for one year, plant rice. If your plan is for ten years, plant trees.
    If your plan is for one hundred years, educate children."

  4. #4
    Field mechanik Senior Contributor omon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Nov 06
    Location
    bk
    Posts
    3,438
    wow, not surprised by the problem, new ac bound to have some.
    but the reaction, of af, and media,,wtf, why not just fix the damn problem, and be done with it, instead of raising stink. it isn't like wings fall off, or it stalls for no reason, just o2 supply cuts off, damn, we went to the moon and mars, and this little problem creates so much stink????? i smell politics
    USSWisconsin likes this.
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" B. Franklin

  5. #5
    Senior Contributor Stitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 Nov 06
    Location
    Patterson, CA
    Posts
    1,997
    Every bleeding-edge aircraft has had problems, going all the way back to World War I; after reading up on the problems aircraft designers had with most of the Century-series fighters, I'm AMAZED that they got built at all: the F-102 went through three different engines before they settled on the J-57, and the fuselage had to be totally re-designed using the area rule principal before it could exceed Mach 1. I could go on and on, but you get the idea; having problems with a brand-new aircraft design is nothing new, it is to be expected. As always, the media is making a mountain out of a molehill.
    TopHatter likes this.

    "Yeah. See, we plan ahead, that way we don't do anything right now. Earl explained it to me." - Tremors, 1990

  6. #6
    Global Moderator
    Comrade Commissar
    TopHatter's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Sep 03
    Posts
    13,559
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
    This is two ANG pilots trying to shame the AF into fixing this. Interesting way to do it.

    The Raptor guys I've talked to roll their eyes a little at the whole thing. Is there a problem? Yes. Is the risk being mitigated at the local level? Yes. Is the media all over this thing because they're awful at their jobs? Yes.
    One of the very best things about the WAB, posts like this^^

  7. #7
    Global Moderator
    Comrade Commissar
    TopHatter's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Sep 03
    Posts
    13,559
    Quote Originally Posted by Stitch View Post
    Every bleeding-edge aircraft has had problems, going all the way back to World War I; after reading up on the problems aircraft designers had with most of the Century-series fighters, I'm AMAZED that they got built at all: the F-102 went through three different engines before they settled on the J-57, and the fuselage had to be totally re-designed using the area rule principal before it could exceed Mach 1. I could go on and on, but you get the idea; having problems with a brand-new aircraft design is nothing new, it is to be expected. As always, the media is making a mountain out of a molehill.
    And this one^^

  8. #8
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    16 Nov 05
    Posts
    2,038
    For the record, I'm glad they're doing it. Being in the Guard they won't face the kind of repercussions as active duty would, and maybe it'll work. There's really no excuse for the failure to figure this problem out. OBOGS is not new, revolutionary, or anything of the sort. LockMart and the AF had five months to figure it out and failed. Unacceptable. There's no reason it should have even gone anywhere near this far.
    TopHatter likes this.

  9. #9
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    05 Sep 08
    Posts
    1,119
    But when the plane endangers people while still on the ground...

    Mystery of F-22 illnesses grows

  10. #10
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    16 Nov 05
    Posts
    2,038
    That doesn't make a whole lot of sense.

  11. #11
    Senior Contributor Versus's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Jul 06
    Location
    Belgrade
    Posts
    988
    So the problem is in the cockpit not in the life support system. Higher and faster argument doesn't stand, the Black bird flies higher and faster than the Raptor and its pilots haven't experineced hypoxia like sympthoms. My guess is that it is the paint in the cockpit that slowly evaporates, maybe even disitegrates or changes its chemical composition in some way, due to UV radiation in the higher altitudes. That would explain why the mechanics are getting sick on the ground, maybe the chemical structure of the paint is changed and it continues to evaporate on the ground as well as it does in the air.
    Last edited by Versus; 11 May 12, at 21:41.
    When I grow up I want to be Ed Harris

  12. #12
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    16 Nov 05
    Posts
    2,038
    None of that explains anything. The SR-71 used a completely different type of life support system than the F-22...they have nothing in common. The pilots will spend most of their time on the mask, while the maintainers are breathing what should be ambient air when they're in the cockpit. Completely different sources of air. If the problem was something from the cockpit itself, there's no way it should get into the pilot's mask, or vice versa.

  13. #13
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    13 Nov 07
    Posts
    1,675
    Being totally unfamiliar with military aircraft, is the cockpit pressurized? Does the pilot experience a different ambient pressure (even though he has a constant oxygen supply via the mask) at higher operating altitudes? If current flight suit is unable to support the pilot for high-G maneuvers at high altitude, does that mean that they have to something more akin to a space suit (eg, the U-2 flight suit or the SR-71 flight suit)?

    SR-71 full pressure flight suit:

  14. #14
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    16 Nov 05
    Posts
    2,038
    There are probably multiple problems. One is hypoxia. That's an issue that a pressure suit could fix, but pilots are experiencing it even at lower altitudes. When you're hypoxic, it takes almost zero time to snap back to reality once you start getting air. The pilot that died in Alaska was hypoxic until impact, and he was certainly low enough that altitude wasn't the issue. The other problem is that there are chemicals making their way into the pilots' bloodstreams. They're getting [i]something[i] into their lungs that's coming from somewhere, and it's not just the charcoal. Maybe there's a common link between these problems, I have no idea. But these are two separate effects that may or may not be related.

  15. #15
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    14 Mar 08
    Posts
    1,415
    Quote Originally Posted by Versus View Post
    My guess is that it is the paint in the cockpit that slowly evaporates, maybe even disitegrates or changes its chemical composition in some way, due to UV radiation in the higher altitudes. That would explain why the mechanics are getting sick on the ground, maybe the chemical structure of the paint is changed and it continues to evaporate on the ground as well as it does in the air.
    Maybe that's why the DoD has been so adamant about capping F-22A buys at 187, despite the F-35's problems.

Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Posting problems
    By Ray in forum WAB Information Center
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 26 May 08,, 23:39
  2. Login Problems
    By leib10 in forum WAB Information Center
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08 Jun 07,, 03:07
  3. Gun problems in OIF
    By troung in forum Small Arms and Personal Weapons
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 29 Mar 05,, 22:47
  4. There within lay the problems.....
    By zimbrul in forum International Economy
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 21 Jul 04,, 07:21

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •