I usually find RAND work interesting at least...this is stupid. It's like a 14 year old paintballer came up with the scenario. I think it's been discussed here before, but was quickly dismissed.
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/...t_Briefing.pdf
I've noticed many problems in their assumptions and the complete removal of the Navy from the equation.
What are your thoughts?
I usually find RAND work interesting at least...this is stupid. It's like a 14 year old paintballer came up with the scenario. I think it's been discussed here before, but was quickly dismissed.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Share this thread with friends: