yeah i guess you're right i'm sorry for getting all belligerent sumku. anyways it was fun while it lasted
anyways i completely agree with sumku on the poiint that we should focus on the pak-fa.
Last edited by bengalraider; 22 Jun 08, at 19:36.
If Brazil is there then its good.....
Brazil would releive us our ATM title....)
" THe SiLEnt KNighT.
Yeah its Brazil, but all three will not be the same i think. They will be linked to each other. Indian one would have french tech(simething like that) in it i think. Each three will made to fit each nation's need, but as i said it should be linked. Outside it will look the same, but inside its something else i think. Just think about the Su-30mki
Russia to Make G5 Fighter in Tandem with Brazil - Kommersant Moscow
CombatACE Forum > PAK-FA gets more one Parthner
Last edited by Super Dude; 23 Jun 08, at 08:20.
we could get the su-34 fullback though should give us good tactical bombing capability
SU-34 Fullback Supersonic Strike Fighter
![]()
naaa dont like how the Su-34 looks. Cant say what i think of it. Plus having a 5G would help InAF really good. I dont think china will be able to get its so called J-XX up in the air for mass production by 2020. So sticking to the PAK-FA would be better.
I think I screwd up my last post.
When I state that "What is not available", I mean that what India would love to have its hand on but which we cannot have. I for sure would love to Scrap the 126 MMRCA deal and would instead buy about 40 Raptors but Raptors are not available for sale so we look to alternatives as to what all is available. A lot of Good Fighters are available, would give India some sort of Numerical Superiority over our Green Neighbour and establish Qualitative superiority over both Green as well as Red.India's procurement Policy is based kept in mind the Current and Future Threat Perception and also what is not available as opposed to what is available to counter these threats and just how much money can be sqeezed out of Indian Economy
India's Defence Procurement Policy has some Drawbacks and is a tad too slow a process but its an effective one-one that has delivered since '62 debacle
First we look, what the threat perception is, then decide what is needed, then minus what is not available and then go out for what is available.[I hope I am making some sense]
@bengalraider: My objective is to engage and get engaged in debate, and not pick a particular poster, so please dont take things personal
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Share this thread with friends: