Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 21 of 21

Thread: Fly the box

  1. #16
    Global Moderator
    Military Professional
    Chogy's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Apr 09
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,648
    Quote Originally Posted by wabpilot View Post
    With line oriented flight training we don't do that over and over again. Demonstrate proficiency and move on. However, if the pilot cannot fly a single engine CAT III ILS, then we will train him or her to do so. Now, if I really want to get nasty, I'll throw a CAT I ILS, engine out, on raw data at a student. (Far more demanding than CAT III since the III is basically set up the autopilot and let her rip.)
    At American, our 737-800's land CAT III being hand-flown with the HUD. The job of the FO was to monitor 8 idiot lights. It wasn't too hard. If an amber or red light flashes ON, you say "Go around."

    During transition, we'd do this what felt like about 100 times. B O R I N G!

    Just like autolandings. The pilots want to maintain proficiency doing the real thing, the airlines want to save money by restricting the number of manual landings.
    Highsea, I don't know how it is everywhere else, but 99% + of our landings are hand-flown from 3,000' on down. There's little difference in cost. If anything, a tight visual approach, hand flown, will save fuel vs. a longer ILS.

    The company has to BEG pilots to autoland the airplane so as to keep it certified to do so. Our 737 fleet can't even do it. In other fleets, no one wants to give a landing to the machine unless circumstances demand it.

  2. #17
    Military Professional wabpilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    05 Dec 03
    Location
    Commuting between Dresden and Ft. Worth
    Posts
    620
    I agree, at our line, no one wants to have the autopilot land. Our operating specification does not allow CAT III without the autopilot like AA does.

  3. #18
    Ex-Wabber Defense Professional
    Join Date
    10 Dec 04
    Posts
    7,029
    Quote Originally Posted by Chogy View Post
    Highsea, I don't know how it is everywhere else, but 99% + of our landings are hand-flown from 3,000' on down. There's little difference in cost. If anything, a tight visual approach, hand flown, will save fuel vs. a longer ILS.

    The company has to BEG pilots to autoland the airplane so as to keep it certified to do so. Our 737 fleet can't even do it. In other fleets, no one wants to give a landing to the machine unless circumstances demand it.
    Difference between real-world and Boeing sales pitch, lol.

    Thanks Chogy.
    "We will go through our federal budget – page by page, line by line – eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way." -President Barack Obama 11/25/2008

  4. #19
    Global Moderator
    Military Professional
    Chogy's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Apr 09
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,648
    Quote Originally Posted by highsea View Post
    Difference between real-world and Boeing sales pitch, lol.

    Thanks Chogy.
    No problem! The landing is probably the only part of the flight that represents any sort of challenge, and "makes or breaks" a flight, at least from the passenger perspective. It can be a bit frustrating, though, when an entire flight is graded only on a landing. We'd spend a lot of time and effort finding smooth, comfortable rides, execute different routes to avoid bad weather, have nice, gentle let-downs, only to have a crummy landing, and have people grumble or joke gently as they de-plane.

    Another major frustration is to do everything perfectly, including the landing, only to be told "your gate is occupied." Within 1/2 an hour, all good feelings are gone. Passengers are understandably mad, and it isn't even our fault. Oh well.

    No one has a lock on 100% nice landings. You might be on a month-long roll, but eventually you'll do a stinker, which chastens and humbles you.

    Interestingly, I found that flying a transport was harder than flying a fighter. But that is flying around, not employing as a weapons system. So if rank-ordered, it'd look something like this...

    - Flying around/landing in an F-15
    - Doing regular 737 trips
    - Employing an F-15

  5. #20
    Ex-Wabber Defense Professional
    Join Date
    10 Dec 04
    Posts
    7,029
    I've always thought a light-twin was one of the highest workloads in civillian flying. You have all the business of multi-engine complex airplane, and only one person on the job.

    Chogy- I hear you on the landings. My first time in the 757 simulator, I porpoised down the runway about 4 times 75-100 feet in the air, lol.

    Just to give the instructor a laugh, when I finally got the plane stopped I keyed the mike and said "Welcome to Boeing Field. Please use caution when opening the overhead bins, as some shifting of the bags may have occured during landing..."
    "We will go through our federal budget – page by page, line by line – eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way." -President Barack Obama 11/25/2008

  6. #21
    Global Moderator
    Military Professional
    Chogy's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Apr 09
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,648
    Quote Originally Posted by highsea View Post
    Chogy- I hear you on the landings. My first time in the 757 simulator, I porpoised down the runway about 4 times 75-100 feet in the air, lol.
    Ha ha! That's why it can be so hard, you are jacked up so high in the air, there's little sense of the ground. Your butt is still 50 feet in the air when the mains touch down.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •