Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: Unknown Stealthy Helo Used in Bin Laden Raid?

  1. #1
    Patron Phoenix10's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Aug 10
    Posts
    253

    Unknown Stealthy Helo Used in Bin Laden Raid?

    Interesting article from aviation week. There is rumor that the SEALS went in with a stealthy helo not seen before now:

    Stealth Helos Used In Osama Raid

    Anyone else heard anything about this before now?
    No One Kicks A$! Without Tanker Gas

  2. #2
    Senior Contributor HKDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 May 06
    Location
    Shanghai
    Posts
    858
    I was just reading about this on another site. Very, very fascinating. I imagine that the wreckage is going to pull in some serious coin for the Pakistanis although from what photos I ahve seen, basically all that is left is the tail.

  3. #3
    Senior Contributor Stitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 Nov 06
    Location
    Patterson, CA
    Posts
    1,674
    Very interesting. From this angle, it looks like a regular MH-60 tail, though the horizontal stabilizer IS at an odd angle to the rest of the tail; you can even see the tail rotor drive shaft sticking out to the right on top of the wall:



    However, the closeup shows what appears to be a stealthy treatment to the vertical stabilizer, in particular the five-bladed tail rotor (the standard tail rotor on the entire series of -60's are 4-bladed). I wonder if they were also possibly using a five or six-bladed main rotor, a-la the now-defunct RAH-66? So, what IS this new helo called? The MH-60X?

    "Yeah. See, we plan ahead, that way we don't do anything right now. Earl explained it to me." - Tremors, 1990

  4. #4
    Regular
    Join Date
    18 Jan 08
    Posts
    99
    Is there anything valuable from the tail that could be compromised?

  5. #5
    Senior Contributor Stitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 Nov 06
    Location
    Patterson, CA
    Posts
    1,674
    Quote Originally Posted by erik View Post
    Is there anything valuable from the tail that could be compromised?
    Probably not much, except for perhaps the paint, which is rumored to be the same type of "silver-loaded infrared suppression finish" as used on the MV-22; the construction of the tail appears to be conventional.

    "Yeah. See, we plan ahead, that way we don't do anything right now. Earl explained it to me." - Tremors, 1990

  6. #6
    Patron Phoenix10's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Aug 10
    Posts
    253
    More details:

    Army Times Mobile

    SOCOM tasked Skunkworks to develop a stealthy black hawk with similar features to the F-117. Not a ton of details but an interesting read nonetheless. Makes you wonder what else is out there (not even counting the black projects). There is a higher res picture of the tail that shows the sharp edges like that of the F-117.
    No One Kicks A$! Without Tanker Gas

  7. #7
    Patron Phoenix10's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Aug 10
    Posts
    253
    Here's the photo:
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    No One Kicks A$! Without Tanker Gas

  8. #8
    Global Moderator
    Military Professional
    Chogy's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Apr 09
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,648
    This chunk of tail is probably the target of much un-published communication between the U.S. and Pakistan. The paint and perhaps some other pieces may have intel value.

    US: "Did you enjoy the show? By the way, we'll expect our helicopter tail within 3 days at the Afghan border."
    Pakistan: "Oh really? You made us look like fools in front of the entire world. Thanks a lot... Oh yes, China has offered $10,000,000 for the part."
    US: "Do you want to continue receiving aid?"
    Pakistan: "Do you want us to funnel the aid to the Taliban?"

    etc

  9. #9
    Regular
    Join Date
    01 Mar 08
    Posts
    151
    That does not look like a the tail of or even a remake of a B-Hawk. I saw some pics from other angles this morning and it looks more like the LHX or something. Who knows what they got cookin over at skunkworks?

  10. #10
    Regular
    Join Date
    01 Mar 08
    Posts
    151

  11. #11
    Patron
    Join Date
    10 Apr 09
    Posts
    195
    I think we can fully expect the parts to go directly to China, regardless of what correspondence is happening in between. Relations are too good, and China's willing to pay to gain information/samples of stealth at a fraction of the cost it would take to develop themselves.

    I don't see the aid as leverage, what's stopping China from filling the gap? Hell China is providing Pak with a better service, physical support against India. The monetary aid imo is increasingly a one sided desperate move to keep Pakistan' on our side', one that has obviously failed in its intent for years.


    How damaging could it be for China to pore over these parts from a stealthy helicopter?

    Are we talking damaging enough that it would have been better to not conduct the raid?

  12. #12
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    13 Nov 07
    Posts
    1,477
    Quote Originally Posted by diablo49 View Post
    I think we can fully expect the parts to go directly to China, regardless of what correspondence is happening in between. Relations are too good, and China's willing to pay to gain information/samples of stealth at a fraction of the cost it would take to develop themselves.

    I don't see the aid as leverage, what's stopping China from filling the gap? Hell China is providing Pak with a better service, physical support against India. The monetary aid imo is increasingly a one sided desperate move to keep Pakistan' on our side', one that has obviously failed in its intent for years.


    How damaging could it be for China to pore over these parts from a stealthy helicopter?

    Are we talking damaging enough that it would have been better to not conduct the raid?
    Probably not too damaging.

    They will see the ultrastructure of the surface treatment and could probably copy it. If the same treatment is on the V-22 however it's probably no longer exotic.

    They will see the tail shape but then again, everyone has seen the RAH-66.

    Most damaging is probably first, the knowledge that the US has this capability, two, the evident utility of doing this motivating other people to try, three, some ideas on how to convert existing helos.

  13. #13
    Patron Phoenix10's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Aug 10
    Posts
    253
    Quote Originally Posted by diablo49 View Post
    Are we talking damaging enough that it would have been better to not conduct the raid?
    I would assume that this was highly considered while planning for the raid and it was deemed "worth the risk". ST6 has the necessary supplies on hand to "destroy" the helo (more than just destroying sensitive electronics) which leads me to believe not only was the risk acceptable but there was a risk migitagation plan in place as part of the mission.
    No One Kicks A$! Without Tanker Gas

  14. #14
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    05 Sep 06
    Posts
    1,759
    German TV channel in a "news" show presented the wreckage of the helo, and then showed...

    a picture of a RAH-66 Comanche in flight.

    Seriously.

  15. #15
    Battleship Enthusiast Defense Professional USSWisconsin's Avatar
    Join Date
    05 Dec 08
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,288
    Quote Originally Posted by Chogy View Post
    This chunk of tail is probably the target of much un-published communication between the U.S. and Pakistan. The paint and perhaps some other pieces may have intel value.

    US: "Did you enjoy the show? By the way, we'll expect our helicopter tail within 3 days at the Afghan border."
    Pakistan: "Oh really? You made us look like fools in front of the entire world. Thanks a lot... Oh yes, China has offered $10,000,000 for the part."
    US: "Do you want to continue receiving aid?"
    Pakistan: "Do you want us to funnel the aid to the Taliban?"

    etc
    how about: " we know where you are keeping it - would you like to hand it over or would you prefer we destroy it where it is?"
    "You wouldn't do that"
    "Oh really, why not?"
    "Ok it is on a truck heading for China, the Taliban have just destroyed your truck"
    ....
    "If your plan is for one year, plant rice. If your plan is for ten years, plant trees.
    If your plan is for one hundred years, educate children." -- Confucius

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. South Korea's Utility Helo Makes Maiden Flight
    By xinhui in forum Military Aviation
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 14 Mar 10,, 07:05

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •