2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-17-2005, 02:12 AM   #61 (permalink)
SuperFlanker
Regular
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Posts: 106
Isnt the standard MiG-21bis also bvr capable?
SuperFlanker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2005, 02:15 AM   #62 (permalink)
indianguy4u
Real Madrid CF
Senior Contributor
 
indianguy4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-07-05
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 3,213
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperFlanker
Isnt the standard MiG-21bis also bvr capable?
As far as my knowledge 125 mig21s where ungraded to bison std which inclded unpgraded avionics, & AAM like R77 & even astra AAM. Maybe a better knowledgable person can guide in this matter.
__________________
Hala Madrid!!
indianguy4u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2005, 02:48 AM   #63 (permalink)
tphuang
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-05-05
Posts: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by indianguy4u
They are as secret & putting spin on news like chinese do. They are talking of MLU for last 3-4 months.But no mention of hardware & software changes.
interesting, I read something on PDF about what they actually changed, can't remember now. Seemed to be a lot of propoganda.
tphuang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2005, 03:25 AM   #64 (permalink)
lemontree
Bandaid
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-04-04
Location: India
Posts: 5,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by tphuang
Just because one PAF pilot chickened out,....
I will not say he chickened out, but he would have got quite anxious since he did not have the means to retaliate at those far off ranges.
Quote:
rather that he didn't want to risk the best planes in PAF service when a canon fodder plane is probably more appropriate for the situation.
That is exactly what the PAF did. Which also indicates that the absence of BVR capability made them put them at risk.
Quote:
Just because Mirage-2k plane can lock on to F-16, you think a bison can do the same? And can actually guide a medium range AAM to hit F-16? Take away all other circumstances, one F-16 block 10/20 vs one bison.
The Mig-21 Bison has the Phazatron Koypo/Super Koypo multirole radars.
Koypo range - 57 km
Super Koypo - 80 km
These radars can track 8 targets simultanously and target 2 at one time.
It uses the Tarang (indeginous) RWR.
Quote:
When do you think each plane will identify each other and who do you think will get to fire the first AAM? If an AAM is coming toward it, do you think bison can avoid it better than F-16?
Useless question till the PAF starts its upgrade as promised by the US in Dec 2005. You should ask how long will it take for a Bison to chase down a PAF F-16 and shot it down.
Quote:
It's one thing to say that you have BVR, it's another thing to say that you can put it in use.
You mean to say that IAF cannot handle BVR?
__________________

Cheers!...on the rocks!!
lemontree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2005, 04:56 AM   #65 (permalink)
Jay
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 6,488
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemontree
You mean to say that IAF cannot handle BVR?
Money we spend on training and multi-national exercises are a big waste then
__________________
A grain of wheat eclipsed the sun of Adam !!
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2005, 10:27 AM   #66 (permalink)
tphuang
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-05-05
Posts: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemontree
I will not say he chickened out, but he would have got quite anxious since he did not have the means to retaliate at those far off ranges.

That is exactly what the PAF did. Which also indicates that the absence of BVR capability made them put them at risk.

The Mig-21 Bison has the Phazatron Koypo/Super Koypo multirole radars.
Koypo range - 57 km
Super Koypo - 80 km
These radars can track 8 targets simultanously and target 2 at one time.
It uses the Tarang (indeginous) RWR.

Useless question till the PAF starts its upgrade as promised by the US in Dec 2005. You should ask how long will it take for a Bison to chase down a PAF F-16 and shot it down.

You mean to say that IAF cannot handle BVR?
not saying that IAF cannot handle BVR, but in order to use BVR, you have to be able to identify opposing planes from BVR. Those range that you gave, who knows what kind RCS numbers those are against. At the same time, you have to be able to track your AAM once you shoot it. a real fourth generation plane like su-30mki could easily identify something from far out and has the necessary hardware to easily guide the AAMs, but what about bisons?

And F-16 would take down a bison in a dogfight.
tphuang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2005, 11:25 AM   #67 (permalink)
indianguy4u
Real Madrid CF
Senior Contributor
 
indianguy4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-07-05
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 3,213
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tphuang
not saying that IAF cannot handle BVR, but in order to use BVR, you have to be able to identify opposing planes from BVR. Those range that you gave, who knows what kind RCS numbers those are against. At the same time, you have to be able to track your AAM once you shoot it. a real fourth generation plane like su-30mki could easily identify something from far out and has the necessary hardware to easily guide the AAMs, but what about bisons?

And F-16 would take down a bison in a dogfight.
A BVR capable AC will use its advantage. Dont u think so. Also If AAM is present in the fighter than its not for show. It can kill .
indianguy4u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2005, 12:07 PM   #68 (permalink)
tphuang
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-05-05
Posts: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by indianguy4u
A BVR capable AC will use its advantage. Dont u think so. Also If AAM is present in the fighter than its not for show. It can kill .
yeah, definitely, I'm not doubting that it's great to have BVR. Bisons upgrade will be great against planes like F-7s and other non-F-16 planes in PAF.
tphuang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2005, 12:16 PM   #69 (permalink)
indianguy4u
Real Madrid CF
Senior Contributor
 
indianguy4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-07-05
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 3,213
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tphuang
yeah, definitely, I'm not doubting that it's great to have BVR. Bisons upgrade will be great against planes like F-7s and other non-F-16 planes in PAF.
Why are u not trying to understand that non BVR f16s in PAF inventory are sitting ducks to BVR capable mig21 bisons of IAF.

Still if u dont understand it, fine.
indianguy4u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2005, 22:16 PM   #70 (permalink)
SuperFlanker
Regular
 
Join Date: 09-16-05
Posts: 106
If its on the PDF...its defiently false. Also, why are you trying to act Chinese? You are clearly another Pakistani who does not wnat to admit where he is from.

Last edited by SuperFlanker : 09-18-2005 at 11:41 AM. Reason: (i didn't realize the word "****" was taboo in this forum)
SuperFlanker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2005, 01:52 AM   #71 (permalink)
indianguy4u
Real Madrid CF
Senior Contributor
 
indianguy4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-07-05
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 3,213
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperFlanker
If its on the PDF...its defiently false. Also, why are you trying to act Chinese? You are clearly another **** who does not wnat to admit where he is from.
Give him a chance to prove otherwise.
indianguy4u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2005, 14:28 PM   #72 (permalink)
tphuang
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-05-05
Posts: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperFlanker
If its on the PDF...its defiently false. Also, why are you trying to act Chinese? You are clearly another Pakistani who does not wnat to admit where he is from.
are you talking to me? I'm a Canadian of Chinese background.
tphuang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2005, 19:19 PM   #73 (permalink)
Sameer
Banished
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 07-12-05
Posts: 2,541
Quote:
Originally Posted by tphuang
are you talking to me? I'm a Canadian of Chinese background.

Guys he is not Pakistani he is a Canadian of Chinese background and a respectable mmber.
Sameer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2005, 19:24 PM   #74 (permalink)
Sameer
Banished
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 07-12-05
Posts: 2,541
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperFlanker
Isnt the standard MiG-21bis also bvr capable?

Noi only the Bison upgrade offers that capability because a radar named Kopyo which is BVR capable was able to be fitted into the small nose of the MiG-21.


There are Israeli upgrades to the MiG-21 family that offer BVR as well.


The Bis is simply a late iG-21 ie it is one of the most update Fishbeds in terms of aerodynamics.



Of course it would shoot down an F-16 easily if it does not have BVR to counter the BISON.


But keep in mind that in a dog fight the Bison would have a problem although the helmet mounted sight is a great match winner and should be able to deal with post PAF threats at close range (heat seeking missiles cued upto 45 degrees off boresight).

Something interesting that many people do not know, if the Bis was unupgraded then it would be at a severe disadvantage compared to the F-7PG (a MiG-21 clone) because the PG is an even later Chinese modification of the Fishbed series wherein they made it slightly more manouverable.
Sameer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2005, 00:55 AM   #75 (permalink)
lemontree
Bandaid
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-04-04
Location: India
Posts: 5,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by tphuang
And F-16 would take down a bison in a dogfight.
Only if both planes use guns against each other. It would be a 50/50 chance depending on the skill of the opposing pilots. Both PAF and IAF are excellent dog fighters.
But if WVR missiles are used then the BISON has an edge, see below as explained by Sameer.
Quote:
But keep in mind that in a dog fight the Bison would have a problem although the helmet mounted sight is a great match winner and should be able to deal with post PAF threats at close range (heat seeking missiles cued upto 45 degrees off boresight).

Last edited by lemontree : 09-19-2005 at 01:10 AM.
lemontree is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LCA beats F-16 Mr_Vastu Military Aviation 137 08-27-2008 14:00 PM
Pakistan Airspace: Night before the nuke tests Asim Aquil Warfare in the Modern Age 19 06-13-2007 01:36 AM
Pakistan 'is a top failed state' Aryaramnaes International Politics 119 05-31-2007 20:30 PM
what is this ??? indianguy4u South Asian Defense Topics 15 05-21-2005 05:38 AM
MiG-29 “FALCON HUNTER” Exclusive : THE WINNER Mr_Vaastu Military Aviation 152 05-20-2005 00:36 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:01 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8