Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 39 of 39

Thread: Avalon 2011

  1. #31
    Global Moderator
    Military Professional
    Chogy's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Apr 09
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,648
    Radar CS "augmentors" - I don't know the exact answer to how the F-22 hides or otherwise deals with this on a peacetime basis, but I do know that it is possible to engineer small metallic shapes that reflect like crazy... kind of an anti-stealth shape. On the rear end of a plywood gunnery target called a Dart is bolted an aluminum box with two flanges making a diamond shape. This box device is only 30 cm or so across, yet creates a cross section like an entire aircraft, allowing easy radar lock.

    It would not be difficult to create such a widget that bolts onto the aircraft and not affect airflow or handling, but this is conjecture.

    Of course with those external tanks, reflected energy is high. Not a bad notion to press to the air battle using those tanks, then jettisoning them at an appropriate moment and vanishing.

  2. #32
    Contributor andrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 Aug 09
    Location
    in the middle of nowhere
    Posts
    495
    Quote Originally Posted by Chogy View Post
    Radar CS "augmentors" - I don't know the exact answer to how the F-22 hides or otherwise deals with this on a peacetime basis, but I do know that it is possible to engineer small metallic shapes that reflect like crazy... kind of an anti-stealth shape. On the rear end of a plywood gunnery target called a Dart is bolted an aluminum box with two flanges making a diamond shape. This box device is only 30 cm or so across, yet creates a cross section like an entire aircraft, allowing easy radar lock.

    It would not be difficult to create such a widget that bolts onto the aircraft and not affect airflow or handling, but this is conjecture.

    Of course with those external tanks, reflected energy is high. Not a bad notion to press to the air battle using those tanks, then jettisoning them at an appropriate moment and vanishing.
    The lenses themselves are not big but they should be oriented in such a way that the RCS of a plane will be distorted from most angles, especially from a head-on position. That's why that device is torpedo-shaped.

  3. #33
    Senior Contributor Stitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 Nov 06
    Location
    Patterson, CA
    Posts
    1,674
    Quote Originally Posted by Chogy View Post
    Of course with those external tanks, reflected energy is high. Not a bad notion to press to the air battle using those tanks, then jettisoning them at an appropriate moment and vanishing.
    That's the theory; in the case of the Raptor, the entire pylon with the tank attached is designed to be jettisoned in order to return the airframe to an LO configuration.

    "Yeah. See, we plan ahead, that way we don't do anything right now. Earl explained it to me." - Tremors, 1990

  4. #34
    Global Moderator Defense Professional
    Join Date
    30 May 06
    Posts
    1,030
    Quote Originally Posted by Stitch View Post
    Was the "security guard" with the German Shepherd patrolling the area around the Raptors the whole time?
    follow up.

    USAF Security Team have stated in RAAF news that this is the first time that non American personnel were permitted insiide the primary security cordon of the F-22. Prev foreign visits anywhere else the USAF Sec team is primary and runs the inner cordon. The USAF force protection commander indicated that this level of trust had not been passed onto anyu other nation prev.

    "The USAF had complete confidence in the ability of the RAAF Sec Police to do the job after witnessing first hand the level of control the handlers have of their MWD (mil working dogs) and their professional application as force protectors" A signiifcant number of the force protection pers were reservists whose primary job is State or Fed police.

    16 working military working dogs were deployed along with 4 explosive detector dogs

    (RAAF News P7 of Avalon pullout.)

  5. #35
    Regular
    Join Date
    30 Jul 08
    Posts
    126
    Quote Originally Posted by gf0012-aust View Post
    follow up.

    USAF Security Team have stated in RAAF news that this is the first time that non American personnel were permitted insiide the primary security cordon of the F-22. Prev foreign visits anywhere else the USAF Sec team is primary and runs the inner cordon. The USAF force protection commander indicated that this level of trust had not been passed onto anyu other nation prev.

    "The USAF had complete confidence in the ability of the RAAF Sec Police to do the job after witnessing first hand the level of control the handlers have of their MWD (mil working dogs) and their professional application as force protectors" A signiifcant number of the force protection pers were reservists whose primary job is State or Fed police.

    16 working military working dogs were deployed along with 4 explosive detector dogs

    (RAAF News P7 of Avalon pullout.)
    Good lookin pups they are to. Although I did notice that the vehicles they were using to transport the pups were 'Budget Rentals' with cages on the trays. What is the deal there?

  6. #36
    Global Moderator Defense Professional
    Join Date
    30 May 06
    Posts
    1,030
    Quote Originally Posted by Gun Boat View Post
    Good lookin pups they are to. Although I did notice that the vehicles they were using to transport the pups were 'Budget Rentals' with cages on the trays. What is the deal there?
    you sure they weren't ADF/RAAF number plates? white background, blue letters, usually 8 figures and no gaps in the character string....

  7. #37
    Regular
    Join Date
    30 Jul 08
    Posts
    126
    They were definately Budget Rent a trucks, the sign was on the doors. Talked to a mate who also saw them. His theory was that the Airforce guards and dogs were probably from a base up north and that there was no point bringing their vehicles down. Sound about right?

  8. #38
    Global Moderator Defense Professional
    Join Date
    30 May 06
    Posts
    1,030
    Quote Originally Posted by Gun Boat View Post
    They were definately Budget Rent a trucks, the sign was on the doors. Talked to a mate who also saw them. His theory was that the Airforce guards and dogs were probably from a base up north and that there was no point bringing their vehicles down. Sound about right?
    Dogs came from Tindal, Pearce and Amberley. So yes, under SRP they'd be renting trucks to save money.

  9. #39
    Ex-Wabber Defense Professional
    Join Date
    10 Dec 04
    Posts
    7,029
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
    Most ATC controllers are looking for squawks, not skin paints. Most of my work with Raptors has been in airspace where they squawked at all times.
    Yep. No need for add-ons to be visible, everyone is squawking. Controller's radar has the plane and data block from the transponder.
    "We will go through our federal budget – page by page, line by line – eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way." -President Barack Obama 11/25/2008

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. ASELPOD to become operational mid-2011
    By denizkuvetleri in forum Military Aviation
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05 Feb 11,, 02:21
  2. Nigeria in 2011
    By Kevin Brown in forum Sub-Saharan Africa
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02 Jan 11,, 04:56
  3. Harper says: Canada out in 2011
    By cape_royds in forum Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11 Sep 08,, 22:29

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •