Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: CH47 Pinnacle Landing - This looks way too Risky!!!!

  1. #1
    Defense Professional ArtyEngineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    09 Dec 09
    Location
    Chattanooga TN
    Posts
    548

    CH47 Pinnacle Landing - This looks way too Risky!!!!

    I cant see any marking on the CH 47 so Im guessing its a 160th SOAR bird and not a regualr Aviation Brigade units.



    Regards

    Arty
    "Admit nothing, deny everything, make counter-accusations".- Motto of the Gun Crew who have just done something incredibly stupid!!!!

  2. #2
    Senior Contributor Stitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 Nov 06
    Location
    Patterson, CA
    Posts
    1,674
    If it's the video I think it is (I don't get YouTube here at work) then, yes, it is a 160th bird; I believe they are inserting a SEAL time somewhere in A-stan.

    The -47 (to my knowledge) is the only Western helo capable of operating at that altitude; perhaps others could correct me, if necessary. Supposedly, the CH-53K will be capable of operating in similar "hot & high" conditions.

    "Yeah. See, we plan ahead, that way we don't do anything right now. Earl explained it to me." - Tremors, 1990

  3. #3
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    16 Nov 05
    Posts
    1,903
    That's the most unnatural thing I've ever seen.

  4. #4
    Defense Professional ArtyEngineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    09 Dec 09
    Location
    Chattanooga TN
    Posts
    548

    Stitch

    Quote Originally Posted by Stitch View Post
    If it's the video I think it is (I don't get YouTube here at work) then, yes, it is a 160th bird; I believe they are inserting a SEAL time somewhere in A-stan.

    The -47 (to my knowledge) is the only Western helo capable of operating at that altitude; perhaps others could correct me, if necessary. Supposedly, the CH-53K will be capable of operating in similar "hot & high" conditions.
    Its actually an extraction of what looks like Army SF, but could be Seals. Im sure its a 160th aircraft but it doesnt have teh refueling probe which is pretty much the signature bit on 160th CH47's

    Arty
    "Admit nothing, deny everything, make counter-accusations".- Motto of the Gun Crew who have just done something incredibly stupid!!!!

  5. #5
    Senior Contributor Stitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 Nov 06
    Location
    Patterson, CA
    Posts
    1,674
    Quote Originally Posted by ArtyEngineer View Post
    Its actually an extraction of what looks like Army SF, but could be Seals. Im sure its a 160th aircraft but it doesnt have teh refueling probe which is pretty much the signature bit on 160th CH47's

    Arty
    No, you're right; definitely an extraction, and most likely SOF, not SEALS.

    The one I remember was an insertion of SEALS (probably Team 10) on a mountain peak in A-stan, about 2005.

    "Yeah. See, we plan ahead, that way we don't do anything right now. Earl explained it to me." - Tremors, 1990

  6. #6
    S2
    S2 is offline

    Military Professional
    Military Professional S2's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Sep 06
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,583
    Extraction. At one point you seen a cuffed and blindfolded detainee. Beaucoup massive cajones for the pilots. Never touch down but, instead, simply back up to a 45 degree slope and drop ramp.
    "This aggression will not stand, man!"
    Jeff Lebowski

  7. #7
    Regular phoggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 Apr 09
    Location
    Munich
    Posts
    105
    In the Vietnam war the US helicopter pilots of 101st Airmobile Division had already demonstrated such « gung ho » flying performance, which was showed in the following picture.



    CH-47 Chinook on the FSB (Fire Support Base) O´REILLY, approx.. 40 km west of Hue in Thua Thien Province with soldiers of Charlie company, Second battaillon, 506th Infantry Brigade of 101st Airmobile Division (August 1970)

  8. #8
    Banned Regular
    Join Date
    31 Dec 10
    Location
    Behind a screen
    Posts
    99
    I'll have to show this vid to one of my neighbors sons (who's an AFSOC guy) when he comes back. I know someone that did this with his UH1 in 'nam except he would pitch his nose with the cyclic to match the incline of a hill in a valley or river to extract some guys under fire. The rationale was of course that the hill would protect the troops and the chopper. He would slide down the hill (backwards basically) to break the line of sight and then high tail it out. By the time the enemy troops made it on the hill plateuau to fire the helo was gone. Hard to explain but I think you get my point.
    Last edited by Porsche917LH; 02 Mar 11, at 01:27.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Rough landing
    By Hoss in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05 Apr 09,, 05:09
  2. hard landing vs stimulus
    By kualaws in forum East Asia and the Pacific
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08 Feb 09,, 15:30
  3. USArmy's bold risky plan in putting a fuel/ammo depot in front of force
    By Blademaster in forum Warfare in the Modern Age
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 19 Jul 08,, 22:00
  4. A-10 Landing gear
    By TopHatter in forum Military Aviation
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03 Jun 06,, 04:43

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •