Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: F-22 wing area?

  1. #1
    Contributor
    Join Date
    17 Dec 06
    Posts
    623

    F-22 wing area?

    I've just done an estimate of the J-20 wing area based on the attached wings, pictures, and third-party diagrams and the figures indicate extreme wing loading, with various wing areas being 48, 55, and 57 m^2.

    We compared it over to the F-22, but using the same methodology, we only got around 40 m^2 for the F-22's wing area, which is far below the listed Lockheed wing area.

    How does Lockheed calculate wing area?

  2. #2
    FJV
    FJV is offline
    Patron
    Join Date
    14 Jul 10
    Posts
    199

    Speculation

    Could be that the F-22 is also designed to be (partly) a lifting body. That is, the plane's body also works as a wing.

    However with all the secrecy surrounding that plane it is impossible to confirm this with 100% certainty.

  3. #3
    Contributor andrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 Aug 09
    Location
    in the middle of nowhere
    Posts
    495
    Quote Originally Posted by Inst View Post
    We compared it over to the F-22, but using the same methodology, we only got around 40 m^2 for the F-22's wing area, which is far below the listed Lockheed wing area.
    Did you include the tailplanes and LERXs.
    I did a rough estimation and got approximately 72-74 m2.
    That's less than 78 m2 they give in wiki.
    Perhaps they include the horizontal projection of the vertical tails, since they are canted and therefore should produce some lift.
    Last edited by andrew; 22 Feb 11, at 11:33.

  4. #4
    Patron Phoenix10's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Aug 10
    Posts
    253
    It is my understanding that in most cases, the vertical and horizontal tails are symmetric airfoils. Therefore, even if canted, they would not provide any lift unless they were 1) permanently installed at some positive angle of attach relative to the free stream or 2) unless control surface deflections are made. That is, even if canted there would be no pressure difference from the bottom or top side due to the symmetry. This is usually done so that there is no contribution to pitch/roll/yaw moments until the pilot intends there to be (by deflecting a control surface). Again, I do not know the details of the PAK-FA's design, I am just speaking to my understanding of how things are usually done.
    Last edited by Phoenix10; 23 Feb 11, at 19:03.
    No One Kicks A$! Without Tanker Gas

  5. #5
    Contributor andrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 Aug 09
    Location
    in the middle of nowhere
    Posts
    495
    I've got an answer from an aviation engineer.
    Apparently, it's simple.
    The gray figure is 78 m2.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. DC Area Get Together?
    By Shek in forum World Affairs Board Pub
    Replies: 85
    Last Post: 23 Sep 09,, 16:34
  2. After Army, Navy too wants new air wing
    By sohamsri in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 25 Jun 08,, 15:11
  3. army ranger wing ireland
    By praetorian1 in forum Multimedia & Jukebox room
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09 May 07,, 19:55
  4. F-15 with one wing
    By gunnut in forum Military Aviation
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 29 Jul 06,, 12:58
  5. Damn Left Wing Media
    By Leader in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 08 Sep 05,, 03:36

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •