Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 32

Thread: India to buy 10 C-17's

  1. #1
    Contributor axeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    13 Sep 08
    Location
    New Delhi
    Posts
    306

    India to buy 10 C-17's

    Centre okay with Boeing aircraft to replace ageing IL-76 fleet

    One question - can a C-17 really 'replace' an Il-76 ? To my mind, they're different categories of transport aircraft.

  2. #2
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    18 Nov 05
    Location
    Suburban Ohio, I commute to redneck land on the we
    Posts
    1,056
    Quote Originally Posted by axeman View Post
    Centre okay with Boeing aircraft to replace ageing IL-76 fleet

    One question - can a C-17 really 'replace' an Il-76 ? To my mind, they're different categories of transport aircraft.
    The C-17 is a larger aircraft capable of handling larger payloads, yet it only needs slightly longer runways. Less than a 500' with similiar take-off load weights. Anything you would want to use an IL-76 for that you can't use a C-17 for you would or could easily use a pair of 130's. It is also a very very small number of missions.

  3. #3
    Global Moderator
    Comrade Commissar
    TopHatter's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Sep 03
    Posts
    13,564
    Air Vectors commented on the IL-76MF "stretch" version (similar to the C-141B upgrade) versus the C-17

    Jordan purchased two [IL-76MF's] in 2005, making that country the first foreign user of the variant.

    Commentaries in the Western aviation press suggested the Jordanians got a pretty good deal, pointing out that the Il-76MF had about three-quarters of the lift capacity of the modern Boeing C-17, range equal to the C-17, but about a quarter of the flyaway cost.

    How operating costs compare is hard to say: Soviet-Russian gear has a reputation for a certain crudity, but it is also often very rugged, reliable, and easy to maintain.
    Personally I'd much rather have the C-17, for a variety of reasons, but then again, I'm not the one having to cut the procurement check.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Among the community of nations, Pakistan today stands out on one hand as a petty thug brandishing a dangerous weapon, and at other times as a concubine, sleeping with anyone willing to pay for her expensive tastes. ~ Tarek Fatah

  4. #4
    Patron
    Join Date
    05 Nov 09
    Posts
    260

    C-17 = Il-76 (sorta)

    Here's some footage of C-17 operating from rough strips.

    Ice Runway Landing
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exR0-...eature=related

    Landing on Dirt Runway
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diX3x...eature=related

    Dirt Strip Takeoff
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DO5Pv...eature=related

    And... an A319 landing on an ice runway in Antarctica
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCbQP...eature=related

  5. #5
    GunnerMKI's Avatar
    Join Date
    21 Jul 09
    Posts
    5
    The Deal is still under preliminary agreement, they are now in process of finalizing the details of the sale. I wonder how much time will take to settle the agreement on the price.

    When each C-17s cost $191 million per aircraft. Why does it cost $4.5 billion for 10 Aircrafts??

  6. #6
    Global Moderator
    Military Professional
    Defense Professional
    Albany Rifles's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Apr 07
    Location
    Prince George, VA
    Posts
    5,356
    Quote Originally Posted by GunnerMKI View Post
    When each C-17s cost $191 million per aircraft. Why does it cost $4.5 billion for 10 Aircrafts??
    2 Points.

    1. The price also includes aircraft spare parts, simulators, flight instruction, ground support equipment, etc. You can not just by a military aircraft off the shelf these days without the backside supprot which is needed to keep it operational.

    2. Welcome to the WAB. Recommend you go to the new member introductions thread and introduce yourself. You also may want to read the forum guidelines

    http://www.worldaffairsboard.com/mem...2-30-09-a.html

    as well as the unofficial guidelines.

    http://www.worldaffairsboard.com/mem...val-guide.html

    They'll help insure your stay is a pleasant one!
    Remember that it is the Actions and not the Commission that make the Officer and that there is More expected from him than the title. – GEORGE WASHINGTON

  7. #7
    Senior Contributor Stitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 Nov 06
    Location
    Patterson, CA
    Posts
    1,997
    Quote Originally Posted by TopHatter View Post
    Air Vectors commented on the IL-76MF "stretch" version (similar to the C-141B upgrade) versus the C-17



    Personally I'd much rather have the C-17, for a variety of reasons, but then again, I'm not the one having to cut the procurement check.
    Agreed. I'm guessing the C-17's will also last a lot longer than the Il-76's. Plus, you don't have to worry about the company going bankrupt in the next decade or so (though Ilyushin HAS come a long ways since the '90's).

    "Yeah. See, we plan ahead, that way we don't do anything right now. Earl explained it to me." - Tremors, 1990

  8. #8
    Arzi Hukumat-e-Azad Hind Senior Contributor Tronic's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Dec 04
    Location
    Patiala, Punjab
    Posts
    3,546
    India Considering Six Additional Boeing C-17 Globemaster III Heavy Lift Aircrafts for Air Force



    2010-11-09 Newspaper reports indicate that India is considering purchasing an additional six Boeing C-17 Globemaster III heavy airlift aircrafts -- these are on top of the ten previously ordered in a USD 4.1 billion deal expected to create more than twenty thousand jobs back in the United States.


    "After we have evaluated the performance of the 10 C-17s, we will take a decision on whether to order another six."
    --Air Chief Marshal P.V. Naik, Chief of the Indian Air Force

    The Boeing (formerly McDonnell Douglas) C-17 Globemaster III is a large military transport aircraft. Developed for the United States Air Force from the 1980s to the early 1990s by McDonnell Douglas, the C-17 is used for rapid strategic airlift of troops and cargo to main operating bases or forward operating bases throughout the world; it can also perform tactical airlift, medical evacuation and airdrop missions.

    The unit price for a Boeing C-17 Globemaster III is roughly USD 200 million and an additional order for six should be worth around USD 2.4 billion.

    India Considering Six Additional Boeing C-17 Globemaster III Heavy Lift Aircrafts for Air Force | India Defence
    The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new lands but seeing with new eyes.

  9. #9
    Ex-Wabber Defense Professional
    Join Date
    10 Dec 04
    Posts
    7,029
    Wonder where they get those job numbers. The C-17 line has 5,000 workers. They put out 16 frames a year. The line is booked through 2013, add the India orders makes it 2014. They're sure not going to add 20,000 people in Long Beach for 16 frames.

    Boeing's statement is the orders for the C-17's and 737's will "sustain" 22,000 jobs. They aren't looking to put more people on either in Long Beach or Renton any time soon- at least they aren't hiring (or advertising for) production people right now.

    737's currently come off at 31.5 per month, that will go up to 35 per month in 2012 and 38 per month in 2013. Those orders continue to come in, so if there's any expansion it would be in Renton.
    Last edited by highsea; 10 Nov 10, at 03:27.
    "We will go through our federal budget – page by page, line by line – eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way." -President Barack Obama 11/25/2008

  10. #10
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    16 Nov 05
    Posts
    2,038
    Subcontractors.

    That said, I don't understand how it's going to be creating much of anything...the line is already open, so those jobs (mostly) probably already exist. Unless we're in some kind of bizarro 1960s where humans are replacing robots on the assembly line.

  11. #11
    Ex-Wabber Defense Professional
    Join Date
    10 Dec 04
    Posts
    7,029
    The 30 737's for Spicejet were already slotted in the 2010 order book, so it has no effect on the Renton backlog. 30 frames over 5 years delivery schedule starting 2014.

    The orders are good news, but they aren't going to translate into a bunch of new hires.
    Last edited by highsea; 10 Nov 10, at 03:39.
    "We will go through our federal budget – page by page, line by line – eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way." -President Barack Obama 11/25/2008

  12. #12
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    22,082
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
    Subcontractors.

    That said, I don't understand how it's going to be creating much of anything...the line is already open, so those jobs (mostly) probably already exist. Unless we're in some kind of bizarro 1960s where humans are replacing robots on the assembly line.
    These must be jobs "created or saved" by Obama.
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  13. #13
    Senior Contributor kuku's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Feb 08
    Location
    delhi
    Posts
    843
    Quote Originally Posted by Tronic View Post
    [
    2010-11-09 Newspaper reports indicate that India is considering purchasing an additional six Boeing C-17 Globemaster III heavy airlift aircrafts -- these are on top of the ten previously ordered in a USD 4.1 billion deal expected to create more than twenty thousand jobs back in the United States.

    The unit price for a Boeing C-17 Globemaster III is roughly USD 200 million and an additional order for six should be worth around USD 2.4 billion.

    India Considering Six Additional Boeing C-17 Globemaster III Heavy Lift Aircrafts for Air Force | India Defence
    Who the hell comes up with these price figures

    10 for 4.1 billion dollars (Has been denied by supplier as the value of the deal, its much higher).
    200 million dollars per unit, hence additional order of 6 will cost 2.4 billion dollars. WTH that is just strange.
    Last edited by kuku; 10 Nov 10, at 05:11.
    cheers

  14. #14
    Military Enthusiast Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    15 Aug 03
    Posts
    3,344
    Sometimes I think it would be far cheaper to build a railroad line to Leh considering it is one of the most inhospitable terrain to cut through. I really don't see the need for C-17s when the IL-76s are doing the job adequately. We have very little overseas commitments. Even if we get 30 C-17s, we cannot utilize those planes to make any military tactical advantage or effect. Momentum will still need to come through the ground. I'd rather spend that amount of money building ground infrastructure or increase the training of our soldiers. It gives off a better rate of return than these overpriced planes.

  15. #15
    Senior Contributor kuku's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Feb 08
    Location
    delhi
    Posts
    843
    Quote Originally Posted by Blademaster View Post
    Sometimes I think it would be far cheaper to build a railroad line to Leh considering it is one of the most inhospitable terrain to cut through. I really don't see the need for C-17s when the IL-76s are doing the job adequately. We have very little overseas commitments. Even if we get 30 C-17s, we cannot utilize those planes to make any military tactical advantage or effect. Momentum will still need to come through the ground. I'd rather spend that amount of money building ground infrastructure or increase the training of our soldiers. It gives off a better rate of return than these overpriced planes.
    And the roads will help in tourism, that is a beautiful stretch of road.


    not the easiest of things to make a road up there
    Manali-Leh road link may be used round-the-year - The Economic Times
    Sonia to lay Rohatng Tunnel foundation, making Manali-Leh road usable round the year

    Its not going to to be a plane purchased strictly for operations in Leh and Laddak.

    Even with the roads they need an airlift capability, moving men and material by road takes time, more like an all round capability to balance the much discussed (in news media) capability of the chinese to make superhighways through the mountains.

    I think price is considered with the available capability, the InAF analysed all available options from America, Europe and Russia, the plane was selected for its capability.

    I agree though that for the near 6 billion dollar invested in the planes, and the billions required for the next 6 planes, the government should give equal billions to BRO for developing the roads along PRC border states (J&K, HP, UK, Sikkim, Aru.P)
    Last edited by kuku; 10 Nov 10, at 07:46.
    cheers

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 50
    Last Post: 29 Apr 08,, 19:14

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •