2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-01-2005, 08:35 AM   #91 (permalink)
saint79
New Member
 
Join Date: 05-01-05
Posts: 2
hi all
what is the AESA Tech?
and wht is the different between it and pesa tech?
sorry guys but i am new in all of this
thanks
saint79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2005, 13:19 PM   #92 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,585
Quote:
Originally Posted by saint79
...what is the AESA Tech?
Did you read the first page of this thread?

In an nutshell, AESA= Active Electronically Scanned Array- composed of elements with T/R modules integrated to the individual element.

PESA= Passive Electronically Scanned Array- T/R is done by TWT tubes not integrated to the elements.

AESA is more capable, elements are frequency agile and system uses LPI principles. Beam can be rapidly steered and multi task. PESA hass steerable beam, but all elements operate on a single frequency and no LPI modes. PESA is jammable by saturating TWT tube. AESA is not jammable, since elements can operate on multiple frequencies.
__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar...

Last edited by highsea : 05-01-2005 at 13:32 PM.
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2005, 14:34 PM   #93 (permalink)
saint79
New Member
 
Join Date: 05-01-05
Posts: 2
frist thanks highsea
can u give me example for Aesa tech and pesa tech (radars)?
saint79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2005, 15:43 PM   #94 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,585
I will give you examples for fighter aircraft.

The US has AESA radars for 5 fighters, F-16 (AN/APG68(v)9 or AN/APG 80), F-15 AN/APG 63(v2)), F-18 (AN/APG 79) F-22 (AN/APG77), and JSF (AN/APG 81). These are all fairly new, and not all of the older AC have them.

Basically, everything uses passively scanned arrays. Elta (Israel) has developed an AESA radar, the EL/M 2052 that is aimed at the Mirage and Sukhoi market. The Europeans are working on one, the AMSAR, which will go in Typhoons, probably the Rafale, and whatever else. Phazotron (Russia) has developed one that was targeted for the Pak-fa, but it's future is still in question due to funding.
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2005, 15:59 PM   #95 (permalink)
Blademaster
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-15-03
Posts: 3,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea
I will give you examples for fighter aircraft.

The US has AESA radars for 5 fighters, F-16 (AN/APG68(v)9 or AN/APG 80), F-15 AN/APG 63(v2)), F-18 (AN/APG 79) F-22 (AN/APG77), and JSF (AN/APG 81). These are all fairly new, and not all of the older AC have them.

Basically, everything uses passively scanned arrays. Elta (Israel) has developed an AESA radar, the EL/M 2052 that is aimed at the Mirage and Sukhoi market. The Europeans are working on one, the AMSAR, which will go in Typhoons, probably the Rafale, and whatever else. Phazotron (Russia) has developed one that was targeted for the Pak-fa, but it's future is still in question due to funding.
I really hope that InAF goes after the Elta AESA radars. Why does US have 5 different AESA radars for the planes? Would it be easier and save on costs if all the planes are standardized on one or two types of AESA?
Blademaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2005, 16:19 PM   #96 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,585
Well, all of the AC have different size fuselages, and you want the biggest antenna you can fit. The APG63 and APG68 are first generation AESA, and based on previous versions of those radars- the APG77, 79, and 81 are second gen, and use common components. The JSF radar is based on the F-22's, it just has fewer elements and no side arrays, 1500 elements rather than 2200.

I think the EL/M 2052 will prove to be a very good radar.
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2005, 19:06 PM   #97 (permalink)
Blademaster
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-15-03
Posts: 3,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea
Well, all of the AC have different size fuselages, and you want the biggest antenna you can fit. The APG63 and APG68 are first generation AESA, and based on previous versions of those radars- the APG77, 79, and 81 are second gen, and use common components. The JSF radar is based on the F-22's, it just has fewer elements and no side arrays, 1500 elements rather than 2200.

I think the EL/M 2052 will prove to be a very good radar.
I don't understand how the USAF number the AESA. It seems to move all over without giving a coherent pattern.
Blademaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2005, 21:39 PM   #98 (permalink)
gangsta540i
Regular
 
Join Date: 03-25-05
Posts: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blademaster
I really hope that InAF goes after the Elta AESA radars. Why does US have 5 different AESA radars for the planes? Would it be easier and save on costs if all the planes are standardized on one or two types of AESA?

Does anyone know if the indian airforce is pursuing this radar that Israel made. It would be a really good idea and they already are getting quite a few things from Israel because their technology is really good.
gangsta540i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2005, 23:12 PM   #99 (permalink)
Dima
Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-27-05
Posts: 434
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea
Phazotron (Russia) has developed one that was targeted for the Pak-fa, but it's future is still in question due to funding.
yo, do you still know where my link regarding Russia develpoing AESA radar is? because i can't find it, maybe you can you havea n article that you know of, if you do, can you please send it to me
__________________
for MOTHER MOLDOVA
Dima is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2005, 23:12 PM   #100 (permalink)
Dima
Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-27-05
Posts: 434
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea
Phazotron (Russia) has developed one that was targeted for the Pak-fa, but it's future is still in question due to funding.
yo, do you still know where my link regarding Russia develpoing AESA radar is? because i can't find it, maybe you can you havea n article that you know of, if you do, can you please send it to me

wow, imagine a Su-30MKI with an AESA radar
Dima is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2005, 23:45 PM   #101 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,585
Russian radars:

http://defblog_ravio.rediffblogs.com...o_archive.html
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2005, 03:26 AM   #102 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Damn, i never even realized the APG-68(V)9 was an AESA set...or is that the Block60 only radar?
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2005, 11:02 AM   #103 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,585
Oops! I think you are right, Snipe- the APG68(v)9 is not AESA- my bad. The APG80 is, that is the radar in the Block 60's.
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Analysis: Chechnya Ironduke The Western Alliance 4 07-28-2008 19:30 PM
Top Ten Chinese Military Modernization Developments oneman28 International Defense Topics 96 06-23-2008 01:49 AM
F-22, stuff you should know Rusky Military Aviation 275 09-21-2007 01:19 AM
IAF purchasing more and more. ajaybhutani South Asian Defense Topics 54 04-20-2005 09:05 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:07 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8