Page 2 of 20 FirstFirst 1234567891011 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 289

Thread: Does China have the capability to build a stealth fighter that can match F22 in 2020?

  1. #16
    New Member wilson_clee's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jun 08
    Posts
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by Skywatcher View Post
    I'm afraid I'm echoing everyone else. Do you mean the current Raptor or the Raptor of 2020?

    The Raptor of 2005 is somewhat plausible and if China was very lucky, but by the time we see the JXX (I wonder what the 601 proposal looks like, word on the street is that it was chosen over 611.), the Raptor will probably have laser missile defense systems and all sorts of things that we haven't even dreamed of yet.
    Actually,I mean the program is close to current Raptor(2005)

  2. #17
    New Member wilson_clee's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jun 08
    Posts
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by Yusuf View Post
    For this to happen i think China will have to do what it does best. Borrow or Steal
    anyway,The result is the most important

  3. #18
    Military Enthusiast Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    15 Aug 03
    Posts
    2,832
    All things are possible if one has time and money. However, there are diminishing gains we can get from today's technology. In my opinion, I think we are somewhat plateauing in how much more advances we can make in aerospace engineering unless a new avenue of technology comes up such as plasma technology, quick start ion engines, or engines that use other sources of fuel other than fossil fuel or even artificial gravity compensators or inertial dampeners.

    IMHO, the next plane would be a combat UCAV. That will push the field of the technology way further because without the limiting factor, the pilot, the plane can reach its full potential.

  4. #19
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    16 Nov 05
    Posts
    1,903
    Pilots arent quite the limiting factor people think they are. Most weapon/airframe combinations have a much lower G-limit than a pilot. You're not going to pull 15G with a UCAV and still be able to drop a 2k lb JDAM.

    Sure they can design around it, but getting rid of the pilot isnt a magical fix.

  5. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    22 Jun 08
    Posts
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by Skywatcher View Post
    I wonder what the 601 proposal looks like, word on the street is that it was chosen over 611.
    Ah, I heard the exact opposite, Chengdu have won over Shenyang, which is reasonable considering the success of J-10 and FC-1.

  6. #21
    Military Enthusiast Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    15 Aug 03
    Posts
    2,832
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
    Pilots arent quite the limiting factor people think they are. Most weapon/airframe combinations have a much lower G-limit than a pilot. You're not going to pull 15G with a UCAV and still be able to drop a 2k lb JDAM.

    Sure they can design around it, but getting rid of the pilot isnt a magical fix.
    True but getting rid of the pilot translates to freeing up weight that was used to support the pilot such as ejection seat, life support, etc. You can make the plane much more nimble and have greater freedom of designing the plane without human constraints. Also you have a greater payload.

  7. #22
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    21,348
    Quote Originally Posted by edmx View Post
    Well, I think by 2020 China could come out with a stealth fighter on par with TODAY's F-22A, but by then Raptor would have evolved a lot more advanced. So the gap will always be there, just how much China could reduce it.
    Can China build a plane today, from ground up, to match the F-15E?
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  8. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    22 Jun 08
    Posts
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
    Can China build a plane today, from ground up, to match the F-15E?
    Regarding "from ground up", can USA build a rocket today, from ground up, without any Nazi Germany input, to match the "Long March"?

    Seriously, why reinvent the wheel?

    So my answer is yes, J-11BS is rolling out soon.

    Last edited by edmx; 28 Jun 08, at 22:17.

  9. #24
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    16 Nov 05
    Posts
    1,903
    That's great. It rolled out a couple of decades ago in Russia.

  10. #25
    Global Moderator
    Devil's Advocate
    ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 May 06
    Location
    Boston, MA.
    Posts
    4,634
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
    That's great. It rolled out a couple of decades ago in Russia.
    Ouch.
    I enjoy being wrong too much to change my mind.

  11. #26
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    14 Mar 08
    Posts
    1,273
    Given how much timeframe to build a F-15E equivalent?

    There was a Shenyang J-13 project back in the 80s (looked a bit like the MiG 25/31) but was canceled for the want of money and engines. If the Chinese had kept that program alive and used the avionics they have now, they might have a F-15 E look alike.

    Pardon me, I mixed up the design institutes. (601 and 611, that is).

  12. #27
    Regular Super Dude's Avatar
    Join Date
    13 Jun 08
    Posts
    86
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
    That's great. It rolled out a couple of decades ago in Russia.
    Well what do you think. It is what they are good at.

  13. #28
    New Member wilson_clee's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jun 08
    Posts
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
    That's great. It rolled out a couple of decades ago in Russia.
    buddy,J11BS used the contemporary avionics.

  14. #29
    New Member wilson_clee's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jun 08
    Posts
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by Skywatcher View Post
    Given how much timeframe to build a F-15E equivalent?

    There was a Shenyang J-13 project back in the 80s (looked a bit like the MiG 25/31) but was canceled for the want of money and engines. If the Chinese had kept that program alive and used the avionics they have now, they might have a F-15 E look alike.

    Pardon me, I mixed up the design institutes. (601 and 611, that is).
    601-shenyang 611-chengdu

  15. #30
    Senior Contributor Yusuf's Avatar
    Join Date
    26 Dec 07
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    2,121
    Quote Originally Posted by edmx View Post
    Regarding "from ground up", can USA build a rocket today, from ground up, without any Nazi Germany input, to match the "Long March"?

    Seriously, why reinvent the wheel?

    So my answer is yes, J-11BS is rolling out soon.
    Why do i feel that this airframe look familiar?

Page 2 of 20 FirstFirst 1234567891011 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. World Naval Rankings
    By rickusn in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 82
    Last Post: 22 Jan 09,, 14:12
  2. Does the Future Belong to China?
    By oneman28 in forum World Affairs Board Pub
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03 Aug 08,, 07:16
  3. Most needed in US NAVY
    By Praxus in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 345
    Last Post: 18 May 08,, 01:36
  4. US Encircling China?
    By Ray in forum East Asia and the Pacific
    Replies: 156
    Last Post: 11 Jul 05,, 03:04
  5. US's $5 billion nuclear gamble with China
    By Ray in forum Europe and Russia
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 14 Mar 05,, 08:53

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •