![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#62 (permalink) | |
|
OMGWTFPWNED!
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
__________________
Self-control is the chief element in self-respect, and self-respect is the chief element in courage. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 (permalink) |
|
OMGWTFPWNED!
Senior Contributor
|
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/jsf.htm
The JSF has 2 variants. Conventional Takeoff and Landing (CTOL) and Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing (STOVL) . CTOL variant, as the link suggests, is being developed by LM. STOVL variant is being developed by Boeing. If you have any better information, please post. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 (permalink) | |
|
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional |
Quote:
But the guy that shot him down was very much alive at the end of the latest war. He was debriefed, and I got to read a copy before I left NSA.
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory." - George Orwell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 (permalink) | |
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
The F 35 comes in 3 versions the F35 A is for the Air force and the Basic version The F35 B is the USMC version with a Vertical lift fan developed by Lockheed Martin not Boeing and the F35 C this version has longer wings and is reenforced for carrier landings it it the version still under development.
__________________
"Finger never touches Trigger unless some one is going too need a grave digger" (Me)[ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
Would you as an engineer state that MiG-29 is a bad platform? In 2000-2004 Mikoyan have really made a lot of work on modernizing this old bird. They increased its range significantly having changed engines (more economic + lighter weight) and increased internal fuel. They changed wings and engine hondolas with a newer and lighter materials making. This added a lot to its payload... In addition to that more powerfull engines have increased its max take off load. For MiG-29K naval version is now being equipped with open architecture avionics that with newer software assumes using both NATO, Soviet and Israely weaponry.... Guess you as an engineer you must have infomation about last modification.... (your Russian counterparts really track latest western products specs) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
i remain bemused as to why so many russians believe that the USAF/NATO lost vast numbers of fast-jets to yugoslav air defences.
where are the downed airframes? where are the downed pilots or distraught family members? if america is unable to keep the 'secret' of the prisoner abuses in iraq, i think its unlikely that they could somehow lose 30 odd aircrew and aircraft while fighting an airwar thats main characteristic was the number of journalists crawling over everything. the journalists on board the carriers and at the NATO airbases would have seen the rescue helicopters, they would have seen the hole-riddled aircraft and they would see the gaps in the squadrons. moreover, when NATO aircraft were shot down, it was reported quickly - often before the aircrew were rescued, so how did these mythical shootdowns not get reported? or do we have a 'secret' airforce that only employs orphans with no families who won't be missed who fly in invisible aircraft that magicly vapourise whenever a TV camera comes to film the wreakage? odd also that the aircraft claimed to have been shotdown are almost all air-superiority fighters, no tornados, jaguars, mirages, harriers, german phantoms - all aircraft whose ability to defend themselves from fighters while loaded with several two-thousand pound bombs is akin to my ability to defend myself from a great white shark while swimming in 100ft of water and armed only with a pair of speedos. the whole MiG25/29/31 or SU27/31 vs F-15/16/22 arugument is utterly irrelevant, name one conflict in which a force armed with soviet or russian aircraft and doctrine has prevailed against a force armed with western aircraft and doctrine. no? thought not. |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 (permalink) |
|
Defense Professional
|
[quote=Garry]So you have data on SMT version as well? Most of you still consider MiG-29 a version which GDR has handled to Germany.... This was old time version same as considering F-14 by samples left at Iran....
Would you as an engineer state that MiG-29 is a bad platform? [quote] No, I don't consider the MiG-29 as a bad platform, I said it's not on the performance level of an F-15. I think there are some very good variants of the Mig-29. I also consider the F/A-18 E/F an excellent airplane which is in essence a highly upgraded variant of an old F/A-18 A/B/C/D. That doesn't mean it has the capabilities of an F-15 either. F-15 is our top of the line air superiority fighter and has been upgraded as such. It's payload, range, low wing loading, high thrust to weight ratio, survivability, reliability, avionics, and available radar variants allow it to be that way. Compare apples to apples, that's what I'm saying. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
McDonnell Douglas's JSF demonstrator was finished after the Pentagon selected the Pratt & Whitney F-119 over the variable cycle F-120 engine that GE developed for the ATF/JSF programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
Sure was, but that was the centerpiece of McDonnell's diverted airflow vertical fan concept for the STOVL variant. When GE didn't make the downselect, the idea wouldn't work, and our only other option at that point for vertical lift was to put in a second engine. A single engine was explicitly stated in the contract requirements,, and the rest is history. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
Maybe it would have worked great for scare tactics,, hehe. Ground troops would have thought obese flying sharks were attacking,, hehe. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 (permalink) |
|
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
|
"moreover, when NATO aircraft were shot down, it was reported quickly - often before the aircrew were rescued, so how did these mythical shootdowns not get reported? or do we have a 'secret' airforce that only employs orphans with no families who won't be missed who fly in invisible aircraft that magicly vapourise whenever a TV camera comes to film the wreakage?"
Don't you know we killed thier families so we would not have to admit to losing any more planes... "the whole MiG25/29/31 or SU27/31 vs F-15/16/22 arugument is utterly irrelevant, name one conflict in which a force armed with soviet or russian aircraft and doctrine has prevailed against a force armed with western aircraft and doctrine. no? thought not."'' Here is some food for thought. Iraq entered the Iran Iraq war with a more or less totally Russian trained airforce which was considered rather lousy. They ended the war after getting French and British training and were able to under take long range missions, show intuitive up in the air, relied less on GCI, were able to adapt to changing events, anf flew far more aggresivly, and were able to carry the war more and more into Iran. Go figure.... A funny fact about the MiG-29 is that for all the talk about it being such a good dogfighter... the plane was not supposed to do that in service with the WP. It was supposed to take off and shoot the R-27s and then the R-60s and go home no turning none of that. Hell the MiG-21 was not supposed to dogfight in WP service either, just take off slash and run home. I can go on and on with this... |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Indian Military - Daily Update | Endangered | South Asian Defense Topics | 1463 | Yesterday 02:54 AM |
| LCA beats F-16 | Mr_Vastu | Military Aviation | 137 | 08-27-2008 14:00 PM |
| Now, MiG engines may light homes | Tronic | Political Discussions | 9 | 04-13-2008 11:04 AM |
| MiG 1.42 MFI “RAPTOR KILLER” : THE F-22 SLAYER | Mr-Vaastu | Military Aviation | 225 | 08-22-2007 15:12 PM |
| Mig-29 K/kub Fighters For India, First pictures | Endangered | Military Aviation | 62 | 06-10-2007 18:03 PM |