2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-03-2005, 19:40 PM   #61 (permalink)
SwingKid
Regular
 
Join Date: 01-28-05
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by troung
His wife did marry his best friend so that shows they were confident he was dead.
Son, how much do you think you know about women?

-SK
SwingKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 19:40 PM   #62 (permalink)
Maximus
OMGWTFPWNED!
Senior Contributor
 
Maximus's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-31-04
Location: India
Posts: 876
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
LockMart won the JSF competition.

The F-35 is a Lockheed design.
No kidding??!! I saw on the Discovery Channel. The Boeing team celebrating the JSF contract. With Boeing written in huge bold letters. I remember it was JSF because the aircraft could take off vertically.
__________________
Self-control is the chief element in self-respect, and self-respect is the chief element in courage.
Maximus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 19:49 PM   #63 (permalink)
Maximus
OMGWTFPWNED!
Senior Contributor
 
Maximus's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-31-04
Location: India
Posts: 876
Country:
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/jsf.htm

The JSF has 2 variants. Conventional Takeoff and Landing (CTOL) and Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing (STOVL) .

CTOL variant, as the link suggests, is being developed by LM.

STOVL variant is being developed by Boeing.

If you have any better information, please post.
Maximus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 21:41 PM   #64 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,520
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by troung
"Speicher was bagged by a MiG-25. (Don't ask me to prove it, because I won't.) What happened to him after his aircraft was hit is unknown to this day. But we know what happened to his adversary, though. I read his debrief, and as far as I know, he's still alive."

I would put money that he is dead. We are in Iraq and have been there for awhile. If there was anything we would have turned it up.

His wife did marry his best friend so that shows they were confident he was dead.
No, you misunderstand me. SPEICHER is probably dead, true enough, although when that may have happened is unknown to US officials.

But the guy that shot him down was very much alive at the end of the latest war. He was debriefed, and I got to read a copy before I left NSA.
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2005, 22:28 PM   #65 (permalink)
Terran empire
Contributor
 
Terran empire's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-28-04
Location: purgatory...
Posts: 341
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximus
I think when Boeing got the contract for JSF project, Lockheed was also competing. Its true that some components in F-22 come from Boeing, but I am really not sure that Lockheed Martin is building JSF.
Snipe is right Boeing lost the JSF but they are the guys with the UCAV X45 project
The F 35 comes in 3 versions
the F35 A is for the Air force and the Basic version
The F35 B is the USMC version with a Vertical lift fan developed by Lockheed Martin not Boeing
and the F35 C this version has longer wings and is reenforced for carrier landings it it the version still under development.
__________________
"Finger never touches Trigger unless some one is going too need a grave digger" (Me)[
Terran empire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 03:07 AM   #66 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
All three variants are actually all still under development.

So far the A and C model are looking very good, the B model has more problems than Michael Jackson's defense team.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 04:20 AM   #67 (permalink)
Garry
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 06-18-04
Posts: 1,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by jgetti
I'm not being arrogant,, I've dealt with this shmuck before. Read some of the other articles concerning the F-15/Su27 and it's derivitives that I've posted on, you'll find the evidence there. I'm an engineer on the F-15 program in St. Louis,, I know way more data than I'm allowed to post publicly. It doesn't matter what evidence is brought up against this guy, he's heavily bias in his beliefs, and no amout of proof is going to change his mind. That's why I laugh at his comment.
So you have data on SMT version as well? Most of you still consider MiG-29 a version which GDR has handled to Germany.... This was old time version same as considering F-14 by samples left at Iran....

Would you as an engineer state that MiG-29 is a bad platform?

In 2000-2004 Mikoyan have really made a lot of work on modernizing this old bird. They increased its range significantly having changed engines (more economic + lighter weight) and increased internal fuel. They changed wings and engine hondolas with a newer and lighter materials making. This added a lot to its payload... In addition to that more powerfull engines have increased its max take off load. For MiG-29K naval version is now being equipped with open architecture avionics that with newer software assumes using both NATO, Soviet and Israely weaponry....

Guess you as an engineer you must have infomation about last modification.... (your Russian counterparts really track latest western products specs)
Garry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 05:19 AM   #68 (permalink)
dave angel
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-05-04
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 758
Country:
i remain bemused as to why so many russians believe that the USAF/NATO lost vast numbers of fast-jets to yugoslav air defences.

where are the downed airframes?

where are the downed pilots or distraught family members?

if america is unable to keep the 'secret' of the prisoner abuses in iraq, i think its unlikely that they could somehow lose 30 odd aircrew and aircraft while fighting an airwar thats main characteristic was the number of journalists crawling over everything. the journalists on board the carriers and at the NATO airbases would have seen the rescue helicopters, they would have seen the hole-riddled aircraft and they would see the gaps in the squadrons.

moreover, when NATO aircraft were shot down, it was reported quickly - often before the aircrew were rescued, so how did these mythical shootdowns not get reported? or do we have a 'secret' airforce that only employs orphans with no families who won't be missed who fly in invisible aircraft that magicly vapourise whenever a TV camera comes to film the wreakage?

odd also that the aircraft claimed to have been shotdown are almost all air-superiority fighters, no tornados, jaguars, mirages, harriers, german phantoms - all aircraft whose ability to defend themselves from fighters while loaded with several two-thousand pound bombs is akin to my ability to defend myself from a great white shark while swimming in 100ft of water and armed only with a pair of speedos.

the whole MiG25/29/31 or SU27/31 vs F-15/16/22 arugument is utterly irrelevant, name one conflict in which a force armed with soviet or russian aircraft and doctrine has prevailed against a force armed with western aircraft and doctrine. no? thought not.
dave angel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 12:50 PM   #69 (permalink)
jgetti
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 12-07-04
Posts: 406
[quote=Garry]So you have data on SMT version as well? Most of you still consider MiG-29 a version which GDR has handled to Germany.... This was old time version same as considering F-14 by samples left at Iran....

Would you as an engineer state that MiG-29 is a bad platform? [quote]

No, I don't consider the MiG-29 as a bad platform, I said it's not on the performance level of an F-15. I think there are some very good variants of the Mig-29. I also consider the F/A-18 E/F an excellent airplane which is in essence a highly upgraded variant of an old F/A-18 A/B/C/D. That doesn't mean it has the capabilities of an F-15 either. F-15 is our top of the line air superiority fighter and has been upgraded as such. It's payload, range, low wing loading, high thrust to weight ratio, survivability, reliability, avionics, and available radar variants allow it to be that way.

Compare apples to apples, that's what I'm saying.
jgetti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 13:08 PM   #70 (permalink)
jgetti
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 12-07-04
Posts: 406
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximus
No kidding??!! I saw on the Discovery Channel. The Boeing team celebrating the JSF contract. With Boeing written in huge bold letters. I remember it was JSF because the aircraft could take off vertically.
Yep, Lockheed Martin's X-35 demonstrators beat out Boeing's X-32 demonstrators. X-32 was McDonnell Douglas's inherited stepchild that came with mother Boeing in the buyout. We called it the 'Monica' or the 'Lewinski' cause all it did was suck and blow,, hehe.

McDonnell Douglas's JSF demonstrator was finished after the Pentagon selected the Pratt & Whitney F-119 over the variable cycle F-120 engine that GE developed for the ATF/JSF programs.
jgetti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 13:18 PM   #71 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
"variable cycle F-120 engine that GE developed for the ATF/JSF programs."

That engine was a seriously ambitious design.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 13:35 PM   #72 (permalink)
jgetti
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 12-07-04
Posts: 406
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
"variable cycle F-120 engine that GE developed for the ATF/JSF programs."

That engine was a seriously ambitious design.

Sure was, but that was the centerpiece of McDonnell's diverted airflow vertical fan concept for the STOVL variant. When GE didn't make the downselect, the idea wouldn't work, and our only other option at that point for vertical lift was to put in a second engine. A single engine was explicitly stated in the contract requirements,, and the rest is history.
jgetti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 13:47 PM   #73 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
The X-32 was also among the UGLIEST aircraft ever designed, which i'm sure was of no help whatsoever in trying to win the contract, lol...
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 13:51 PM   #74 (permalink)
jgetti
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 12-07-04
Posts: 406
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
The X-32 was also among the UGLIEST aircraft ever designed, which i'm sure was of no help whatsoever in trying to win the contract, lol...

Maybe it would have worked great for scare tactics,, hehe. Ground troops would have thought obese flying sharks were attacking,, hehe.
jgetti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2005, 14:44 PM   #75 (permalink)
troung
A Self Important
Senior Contributor
 
troung's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 4,390
Country:
"moreover, when NATO aircraft were shot down, it was reported quickly - often before the aircrew were rescued, so how did these mythical shootdowns not get reported? or do we have a 'secret' airforce that only employs orphans with no families who won't be missed who fly in invisible aircraft that magicly vapourise whenever a TV camera comes to film the wreakage?"

Don't you know we killed thier families so we would not have to admit to losing any more planes...

"the whole MiG25/29/31 or SU27/31 vs F-15/16/22 arugument is utterly irrelevant, name one conflict in which a force armed with soviet or russian aircraft and doctrine has prevailed against a force armed with western aircraft and doctrine. no? thought not."''

Here is some food for thought. Iraq entered the Iran Iraq war with a more or less totally Russian trained airforce which was considered rather lousy. They ended the war after getting French and British training and were able to under take long range missions, show intuitive up in the air, relied less on GCI, were able to adapt to changing events, anf flew far more aggresivly, and were able to carry the war more and more into Iran. Go figure....

A funny fact about the MiG-29 is that for all the talk about it being such a good dogfighter... the plane was not supposed to do that in service with the WP. It was supposed to take off and shoot the R-27s and then the R-60s and go home no turning none of that.

Hell the MiG-21 was not supposed to dogfight in WP service either, just take off slash and run home.

I can go on and on with this...
troung is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Indian Military - Daily Update Endangered South Asian Defense Topics 1463 Yesterday 02:54 AM
LCA beats F-16 Mr_Vastu Military Aviation 137 08-27-2008 14:00 PM
Now, MiG engines may light homes Tronic Political Discussions 9 04-13-2008 11:04 AM
MiG 1.42 MFI “RAPTOR KILLER” : THE F-22 SLAYER Mr-Vaastu Military Aviation 225 08-22-2007 15:12 PM
Mig-29 K/kub Fighters For India, First pictures Endangered Military Aviation 62 06-10-2007 18:03 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8