![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
Heh, But in the end russians probably can, euros can as well but that plane would make the F 22 look like a used mig21(yeah little exaggeration never hurt anybody) cost wise(but not quality wise). Has Japan actually started on thier own or is that a rumor.
Also when we say stealth it should come with a grade of said ability, lets try to make a best estimate of the gamit of stealth. hmm eg: b52-b1-b1b-b2
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Banished
Regular
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Mitsubishi ATD-X - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quote:
I wonder what they do with Mitsubishi ATD-X advance self defense I think |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
Huh? They don't need open bay doors to detect and acquire the target. The missile can acquire either on its own, or as a hand off. There is no field of view blockage. thats absolute nonsense. what do you think the networking on aircraft like F-22 actually provide. Hint: co-operative acquisition and co-operative attack. one aircraft can direct, one can launch. even if they don't pair up, they can still acquire and transact without needing to "opening the launch bays". one of the advantages of LO aircraft is that they can close the gap and heighten their advantage accordingly on the missiles NEZ. in a given circumstance, any other sympathetic asset in comms field can complete or position the hand off. What has IR sensors on an aircrafts wing roots got to do with acquring the target and directing the missile to target? I'm really interested where you're sourcing these concepts because its apparent that whoever has flagged it is absolutely clueless about what the technology is that exists, and how the technology as it exists can and is utilised. you need to find other sources to criticise this platform. your current ones know bugger all about sensor systems, acquisition technology and the aircraft itself. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
|
if there is one nation on earth that can build a stealth fighter compared to the raptor it is russia, anyhow there are quite a few 5th gen stealth fighter programs in the world a few of them are the indian mca( though the mca is built more in the jsf class), the chinese shenyang j-12 and chengdu j-13, the russian sukhoi PAK-FA ( joint project with india and brazil also possibly the first aircraft to have plasma stealth),the japanese atd-x shinshin, the russian also have the mig MFI 1.44 design that can be reactivated remember one thing on papre the raptor may outclass everything but there are two variables numbers and skill the average cost of a PAK-FA or an j-13 will be 30-60% of a raptor with growing economies the spare money in all the nations associated with these aircraft shall incerase as the wealth of the united states declines so i'm thinking four or five PAK-FA'S for each raptor no matter how stealthy the raptor goes down.
by the way ther are probably going to be three versions of PAK-FA 1- a russian version with russian weapon systems 2- an indian version that shall be much like the MKI having western electronics on a russian platform running indian software, maybe even western missiles india is planning a joint venture with MBDA 3- i don't know what kind the brazilians would want Last edited by bengalraider : 06-25-2008 at 10:56 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
So the reality is that US UAV LO Tech is already on 3rd generation, international LO tech is basically at it's 6th or 7th (and the last 4 are US platform concepts) and that the US is at it's 4th manned platform generation using disparate technologies. The others (and with the greatest respect) have kids extolling their respective favourite non US nations virtues, but have NO empirical evidence to show that they've even got basic CTD's flying (let alone the US which has already benched it's first manned combat generation) and has in excess of 100 5th generation manned combat aircraft in service. So after 49 years of demonstrating that they can produce manned LO aircraft, no other country has even demonstrated a manned mule - let alone a service level platform. the reality is all so stark compared to the enthusiastic but undemonstrated wunderlust that gets thrown about, it alternates between the enthusiasts dearly wanting to slam LO/Stealth as redundant concepts, but unable to go full tilt as their favourite country (non-USA) is in development. There have been 3 different unmanned LO platforms tested in australia - funnily enough, they're all NATO countries or "visible" US allies. Again, the reality is different from the "woulda, coulda, shoulda, will be" brigade. btw the last LO/Stealth Conf in the UK only showed more photoshop entries from the non NATO/Partner cohort. Every year we see the same slideshows, the same wish lists, and the same extraordinary capability which has yet to displayed as a mule - let alone a fully committed squadron where doctrine has been developed and where its part of a coherent system. Last edited by gf0012-aust : 06-26-2008 at 04:12 AM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Russia on the march - again | Ray | The Western Alliance | 312 | 02-14-2008 19:18 PM |
| F-22, stuff you should know | Rusky | Military Aviation | 275 | 09-21-2007 01:19 AM |
| PLA Navy Carrier Update and Euro-Naval Notes | Ironduke | International Defense Topics | 33 | 11-30-2006 00:38 AM |
| So who moved the WMD? Someone did... | Anon | The War in Iraq | 53 | 03-16-2006 11:54 AM |
| Russian Sub Casualties | rickusn | Naval Forces | 16 | 09-19-2005 15:17 PM |