2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-16-2008, 00:06 AM   #16 (permalink)
Doomarias
Regular
 
Doomarias's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-15-08
Location: Bronx, NY
Posts: 56
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBattleship View Post
You mean that dark area under water?
Heh, But in the end russians probably can, euros can as well but that plane would make the F 22 look like a used mig21(yeah little exaggeration never hurt anybody) cost wise(but not quality wise). Has Japan actually started on thier own or is that a rumor.

Also when we say stealth it should come with a grade of said ability, lets try to make a best estimate of the gamit of stealth.

hmm eg: b52-b1-b1b-b2
__________________
Be versatile!
Doomarias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 02:20 AM   #17 (permalink)
obrescia
Banished
Regular
 
Join Date: 07-27-07
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 95
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by avon1944 View Post
The answer is yes, the real question is when! There is far more to the F-22A than stealth. The F-22A is being trained to excel in a world when it no longer has stealth.
The F-22A is going through an upgrade program every three or so years, so the technical advantage it has, it will maintain!

Actually, a fair amount is known about the F-22A. The USAF has to sell the program to Congress and they release information in that effort. Those trying to defeat or stop the F-22 program are also releasing as much information as they can in an effort to accomplish that. To those on the outside (you, me and, the rest of the world) it is just information.
What you don't get is the means to accomplish the task. It is nice to know the amount of thrust the engines produce but, what is the efficiency of the engines. How much thrust per unit of fuel is generated?
One problem Russia has is depending on the West to get the latest in micro-circuits. Yes, getting signal processor circuits from Texas Instruments (TI) is great but, what happens if America, Japan, or Europe cuts off the supply? How much information is available on circuits to be designed three or four years from now? If you have to wait until TI, Intel, Motorola, Sony, etc. announces the new circuits, puts your designs behind. Compared with organizations like the USAF, USN, etc. that have access at an earlier time to this sort of information.
The stealth materials are something that are also in an evolution, some of the materials first used on the F-22 have been improved and that process will continue.
The USS Seawolf and F-22A programs are the extreme high tech no expense spared to get the absolute best technology can provide. The USS Virginia and the F-35 programs are designed to take many of these technologies and discover more inexpensive ways of accomplishing the same task.
To my knowledge, the PAK-FA is not a direct competitor to the F-22. That the direct competitor to the F-22 still has not been started yet. The PAK-FA will have some abilities that will bridge the generation 4.5 and the 5th generation air craft.

Adrian
F-22 will have a few issues after its stealth is ‘not so good’ say in the future. Helmet sighting will need open bay doors for the seeker heads to ‘see’ out into the world, and it will have seeker-head fields of view blockage from the airframe. Also its thermal sensors in each wing root on YF-22 were deleted on the production aircraft (could be installed?) so may limit ultimate use range of AIM-9 compared to aircraft so equipped.
obrescia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 02:26 AM   #18 (permalink)
Super Dude
Regular
 
Super Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-13-08
Posts: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doomarias View Post
Heh, But in the end russians probably can, euros can as well but that plane would make the F 22 look like a used mig21(yeah little exaggeration never hurt anybody) cost wise(but not quality wise). Has Japan actually started on thier own or is that a rumor.

Also when we say stealth it should come with a grade of said ability, lets try to make a best estimate of the gamit of stealth.

hmm eg: b52-b1-b1b-b2
Yeah i think so because lockheed maybe helping. Shin-Shin is what they named it. ATD-X
Super Dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2008, 05:14 AM   #19 (permalink)
gimini
Regular
 
Join Date: 03-28-08
Location: Sri Lanka,Colombo
Posts: 30
Country:
Send a message via MSN to gimini Send a message via Yahoo to gimini
Mitsubishi ATD-X - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Super Dude View Post
Yeah i think so because lockheed maybe helping. Shin-Shin is what they named it. ATD-X
According to Japanese constitution they can have self defense Military
I wonder what they do with Mitsubishi ATD-X advance self defense I think
gimini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2008, 05:30 AM   #20 (permalink)
gf0012-aust
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 05-30-06
Posts: 394
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by obrescia View Post
F-22 will have a few issues after its stealth is ‘not so good’ say in the future. Helmet sighting will need open bay doors for the seeker heads to ‘see’ out into the world, and it will have seeker-head fields of view blockage from the airframe. Also its thermal sensors in each wing root on YF-22 were deleted on the production aircraft (could be installed?) so may limit ultimate use range of AIM-9 compared to aircraft so equipped.

Huh? They don't need open bay doors to detect and acquire the target. The missile can acquire either on its own, or as a hand off. There is no field of view blockage. thats absolute nonsense. what do you think the networking on aircraft like F-22 actually provide. Hint: co-operative acquisition and co-operative attack. one aircraft can direct, one can launch. even if they don't pair up, they can still acquire and transact without needing to "opening the launch bays".

one of the advantages of LO aircraft is that they can close the gap and heighten their advantage accordingly on the missiles NEZ. in a given circumstance, any other sympathetic asset in comms field can complete or position the hand off.

What has IR sensors on an aircrafts wing roots got to do with acquring the target and directing the missile to target?

I'm really interested where you're sourcing these concepts because its apparent that whoever has flagged it is absolutely clueless about what the technology is that exists, and how the technology as it exists can and is utilised.

you need to find other sources to criticise this platform. your current ones know bugger all about sensor systems, acquisition technology and the aircraft itself.
gf0012-aust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2008, 10:52 AM   #21 (permalink)
bengalraider
Contributor
 
bengalraider's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-10-08
Location: new delhi
Posts: 331
Country:
if there is one nation on earth that can build a stealth fighter compared to the raptor it is russia, anyhow there are quite a few 5th gen stealth fighter programs in the world a few of them are the indian mca( though the mca is built more in the jsf class), the chinese shenyang j-12 and chengdu j-13, the russian sukhoi PAK-FA ( joint project with india and brazil also possibly the first aircraft to have plasma stealth),the japanese atd-x shinshin, the russian also have the mig MFI 1.44 design that can be reactivated remember one thing on papre the raptor may outclass everything but there are two variables numbers and skill the average cost of a PAK-FA or an j-13 will be 30-60% of a raptor with growing economies the spare money in all the nations associated with these aircraft shall incerase as the wealth of the united states declines so i'm thinking four or five PAK-FA'S for each raptor no matter how stealthy the raptor goes down.

by the way ther are probably going to be three versions of PAK-FA
1- a russian version with russian weapon systems
2- an indian version that shall be much like the MKI having western electronics on a russian platform running indian software, maybe even western missiles india is planning a joint venture with MBDA
3- i don't know what kind the brazilians would want

Last edited by bengalraider : 06-25-2008 at 10:56 AM.
bengalraider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2008, 04:06 AM   #22 (permalink)
gf0012-aust
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 05-30-06
Posts: 394
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by bengalraider View Post
if there is one nation on earth that can build a stealth fighter compared to the raptor it is russia, anyhow there are quite a few 5th gen stealth fighter programs in the world a few of them are the indian mca( though the mca is built more in the jsf class), the chinese shenyang j-12 and chengdu j-13, the russian sukhoi PAK-FA ( joint project with india and brazil also possibly the first aircraft to have plasma stealth),the japanese atd-x shinshin, the russian also have the mig MFI 1.44 design that can be reactivated remember one thing on papre the raptor may outclass everything but there are two variables numbers and skill the average cost of a PAK-FA or an j-13 will be 30-60% of a raptor with growing economies the spare money in all the nations associated with these aircraft shall incerase as the wealth of the united states declines so i'm thinking four or five PAK-FA'S for each raptor no matter how stealthy the raptor goes down.

by the way ther are probably going to be three versions of PAK-FA
1- a russian version with russian weapon systems
2- an indian version that shall be much like the MKI having western electronics on a russian platform running indian software, maybe even western missiles india is planning a joint venture with MBDA
3- i don't know what kind the brazilians would want
the only aircraft out of the ones you name that isn't a photoshop exercise is the Mig MFI .144. It flew a total of 50 hours and was acknowledged by the russians as unsurvivable in modern contemp battlespace. (ditto the CTD known as the Berkut.

So the reality is that US UAV LO Tech is already on 3rd generation, international LO tech is basically at it's 6th or 7th (and the last 4 are US platform concepts) and that the US is at it's 4th manned platform generation using disparate technologies.

The others (and with the greatest respect) have kids extolling their respective favourite non US nations virtues, but have NO empirical evidence to show that they've even got basic CTD's flying (let alone the US which has already benched it's first manned combat generation) and has in excess of 100 5th generation manned combat aircraft in service.

So after 49 years of demonstrating that they can produce manned LO aircraft, no other country has even demonstrated a manned mule - let alone a service level platform.

the reality is all so stark compared to the enthusiastic but undemonstrated wunderlust that gets thrown about, it alternates between the enthusiasts dearly wanting to slam LO/Stealth as redundant concepts, but unable to go full tilt as their favourite country (non-USA) is in development.

There have been 3 different unmanned LO platforms tested in australia - funnily enough, they're all NATO countries or "visible" US allies.

Again, the reality is different from the "woulda, coulda, shoulda, will be" brigade.

btw the last LO/Stealth Conf in the UK only showed more photoshop entries from the non NATO/Partner cohort. Every year we see the same slideshows, the same wish lists, and the same extraordinary capability which has yet to displayed as a mule - let alone a fully committed squadron where doctrine has been developed and where its part of a coherent system.

Last edited by gf0012-aust : 06-26-2008 at 04:12 AM.
gf0012-aust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2008, 14:51 PM   #23 (permalink)
Jimmy
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-16-05
Posts: 929
Country:
Its a lot easier to say "we could do that if we wanted" than to actually do it.
Jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Russia on the march - again Ray The Western Alliance 312 02-14-2008 19:18 PM
F-22, stuff you should know Rusky Military Aviation 275 09-21-2007 01:19 AM
PLA Navy Carrier Update and Euro-Naval Notes Ironduke International Defense Topics 33 11-30-2006 00:38 AM
So who moved the WMD? Someone did... Anon The War in Iraq 53 03-16-2006 11:54 AM
Russian Sub Casualties rickusn Naval Forces 16 09-19-2005 15:17 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:12 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8