2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
View Poll Results: Which is the better bomber?
Tu-95 8 22.22%
B-52 24 66.67%
Neither 4 11.11%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-30-2008, 10:41 AM   #1 (permalink)
Silent Hunter
Contributor
 
Silent Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-09-07
Location: London, UK
Posts: 513
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Silent Hunter
Tu-95 vs. B-52

Which is the better bomber, the Tu-95 "Bear" or the B-52 Stratofortress?
Silent Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008, 20:01 PM   #2 (permalink)
Bella
Patron
 
Join Date: 09-03-07
Location: Chicago
Posts: 288
Country:
As I posted before, the B-52 has better range, speed, surface ceiling, and bomb capacity.
I also know that the T-95 costs less!!
Please!!........Don't get me wrong!! I think the T-95 is a great bomber, but I think prop planes are something from the mid-20th century.
I also know that both planes are older!
Look!!......Some people think that price is better than performance, but I have to disagree!
Look at the evolution of fighters, bombers, ect, thru the years.
As a good fighter, the P-52 Mustang was a great plane, but as time pasted, countries developed better and faster fighters.
Yeah! The P-52, it is cheaper to build, but it is not as good as planes that can fly faster, farther, and carry more weapons.

That's just my thought.

Thanks!
Bella is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008, 21:30 PM   #3 (permalink)
omon
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
 
omon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Location: bk
Posts: 1,925
Country:
any plane can get downed, especially these two, i,d choose 5 instead of 1.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" B. Franklin
omon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2008, 03:22 AM   #4 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,365
Country:
Tu-95 is too noisy.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2008, 04:42 AM   #5 (permalink)
bolo121
Senior Contributor
 
bolo121's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-19-07
Location: india
Posts: 756
Country:
TU 95 just not cool enough.
bolo121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2008, 09:49 AM   #6 (permalink)
-{SpoonmaN}-
Death, the Destroyer of Worlds...
Senior Contributor
 
-{SpoonmaN}-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-08-04
Location: The badlands of West London.
Posts: 1,455
Country:
Flying around in a crate crammed with turreted cannons and sighting blisters must be quaint if nothing else. Same goes for the PLA-AF's TU-16s.
__________________
"I have this to say to the people of Australia: Kick me, I'm different."
-{SpoonmaN}- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2008, 11:43 AM   #7 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by -{SpoonmaN}- View Post
Flying around in a crate crammed with turreted cannons and sighting blisters must be quaint if nothing else. Same goes for the PLA-AF's TU-16s.
It may appear quaint, but it is still perfectly capable of fulfilling its assigned tasks. Handsome is as handsome does!
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.
glyn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2008, 13:29 PM   #8 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 1,019
Country:
Which one has the greatest proven combat record?
__________________
"Always with the negative waves Moriarty, always with the negative waves." TSGT Oddball, Tank Commander
Albany Rifles is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2008, 14:48 PM   #9 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albany Rifles View Post
Which one has the greatest proven combat record?
The B-52 has dropped more bombs on more enemies, without doubt. Which means the (then) Soviets were more peace-loving? In Vietnam 18 B-52s were lost in combat and 8 in accidents. Both types entered service in 1955 and both are still serving today. Their capabilities are fairly similar, in spite of various American sources overstating the B-52s speed, and denigrating the Bear. I don't think there is too much between the types.
glyn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2008, 14:56 PM   #10 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 1,019
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by glyn View Post
The B-52 has dropped more bombs on more enemies, without doubt. Which means the (then) Soviets were more peace-loving? In Vietnam 18 B-52s were lost in combat and 8 in accidents. Both types entered service in 1955 and both are still serving today. Their capabilities are fairly similar, in spite of various American sources overstating the B-52s speed, and denigrating the Bear. I don't think there is too much between the types.
The Bear has put millions of dead dinosaurs through its exhaust stubs, but how many comabt mission has it flown? How many bombs have been dropped form Bears in the last 3 years? Heck, the Vulcan has probably dropped more bombs in anger!

Actually, I believe the Bear saw some action with the Inidan Air Force, but I could be wrong. But what combat operations has it undertaken?

My point being a lot of what the Bear may be able to do the BUFF has been doing pretty constantly since 1955.
Albany Rifles is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2008, 15:12 PM   #11 (permalink)
Silent Hunter
Contributor
 
Silent Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-09-07
Location: London, UK
Posts: 513
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Silent Hunter
I think the "Bear" was in Afghanistan. IIRC, didn't the Vulcan only do the Falklands?
Silent Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2008, 17:40 PM   #12 (permalink)
omon
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
 
omon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Location: bk
Posts: 1,925
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albany Rifles View Post
How many bombs have been dropped form Bears in the last 3 years? .
bear did fly over us ac group, never heard b52 do the same, to russian ships.
omon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2008, 17:58 PM   #13 (permalink)
zraver
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-22-06
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,532
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by omon View Post
bear did fly over us ac group, never heard b52 do the same, to russian ships.
Different Missions. The Tu-95 is a maritime patrol bomber probably the best in the world. The B-52 is a strategic bomber and probably the best big bomb truck of all time.
zraver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2008, 18:30 PM   #14 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albany Rifles View Post
The Bear has put millions of dead dinosaurs through its exhaust stubs, but how many comabt mission has it flown? How many bombs have been dropped form Bears in the last 3 years? Heck, the Vulcan has probably dropped more bombs in anger!

I simply do not know.

Actually, I believe the Bear saw some action with the Inidan Air Force, but I could be wrong. But what combat operations has it undertaken?

Again, I don't know. There must be some accurate source where this information can be found, but I have yet to discover it.

My point being a lot of what the Bear may be able to do the BUFF has been doing pretty constantly since 1955.
They have both been active since 1955. Bears are mostly (not exclusively) for long range maritime missions. No-one has yet mentioned the Bears engines. They have been the worlds most powerful turboprops for well over half a century. Only 4 are needed to propel the Bear at similar speed to the BUFF - and let us not forget that the B-52 needs 8 engines.
glyn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2008, 18:35 PM   #15 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silent Hunter View Post
I think the "Bear" was in Afghanistan. IIRC, didn't the Vulcan only do the Falklands?
It doesn't matter that with the not particulary successful BLACK BUCK raid the 3 types of V bomber to see service were not engaged in hot wars. They were designed for WW3, and if that lunacy had ever occured I'm sure they would have acquitted themselves well.
glyn is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:27 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8