2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-12-2008, 15:43 PM   #586 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 439
Country:
The marvellous Boulton and Paul Overstrand!

In service 1936-38. Some survived up to 1940.

RAF History - Bomber Command 60th Anniversary
__________________
"Liberty is a thing beyond all price.

Last edited by Tin Man : 04-12-2008 at 15:45 PM.
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 16:26 PM   #587 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,886
[quote=Tin Man;481145]The marvellous Boulton and Paul Overstrand!

In service 1936-38. Some survived up to 1940.

Well done! That's the correct answer.
The turrets were pneumatic and B & P gained knowledge about turrets and used it in their BP Defiant although the system became electro hydraulic. Your question.
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.
glyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 16:58 PM   #588 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 439
Country:
Must have been a revelation for the gunners! Thank you Glyn, another one chalked off!

Now, then...

What was the name of the aircraft that weighed over 500 tons at maximum weight. It could lift 100 tons of cargo and had more than 6 jet engines?
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 17:34 PM   #589 (permalink)
dave lukins
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: cheshire uk
Posts: 5,180
Country:
Are you trying to trick us with the "Spruce Goose"
dave lukins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 17:59 PM   #590 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tin Man View Post
Must have been a revelation for the gunners! Thank you Glyn, another one chalked off!

Now, then...

What was the name of the aircraft that weighed over 500 tons at maximum weight. It could lift 100 tons of cargo and had more than 6 jet engines?
The Antonov An 225 when carrying the Russian space shuttle.
glyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 18:14 PM   #591 (permalink)
dave lukins
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: cheshire uk
Posts: 5,180
Country:
I thought it was the An 225 but it has only 6 engines
dave lukins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 18:24 PM   #592 (permalink)
dave lukins
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: cheshire uk
Posts: 5,180
Country:
How's about the 8 engined B52 stratofortress
dave lukins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 18:27 PM   #593 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 439
Country:
Now, gents, the Cossack would be too easy, wouldn`t it?

It is not the An-225, with or without Buran on its back!
Dave you are right of course, only 6 engines on the Antonov.

Keep `em coming!

Last edited by Tin Man : 04-12-2008 at 18:39 PM.
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 18:27 PM   #594 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 439
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave lukins View Post
How's about the 8 engined B52 stratofortress

Nope, not the Buff either!
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 18:59 PM   #595 (permalink)
dave lukins
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: cheshire uk
Posts: 5,180
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tin Man View Post
Nope, not the Buff either!
Darn it!!
dave lukins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 22:06 PM   #596 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 1,201
Country:
The dirigible Mayfly?
__________________
"Always with the negative waves Moriarty, always with the negative waves." TSGT Oddball, Tank Commander
Albany Rifles is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 01:19 AM   #597 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 439
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albany Rifles View Post
The dirigible Mayfly?
I like your thinking but that is incorrect sir
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 01:24 AM   #598 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 439
Country:
A clue is in order......

It had 8 turbojet engines, was over a hundred feet long and was assigned as a heavy lift aircraft. One version even had an attack role....
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 10:10 AM   #599 (permalink)
Unipidity
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-06-05
Posts: 83
500 tons sounds like the ground-effect sea skimming Russian plane whose designation or name I have forgotten. The huge one.

That also had 8 turbojets, I think. And perhaps had an amphibious assault role?

Edit:

Looked it up; Ekranoplans. The 'Caspian Sea Monster'. And you meants 100m, not 100ft.

Last edited by Unipidity : 04-13-2008 at 10:13 AM.
Unipidity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 11:07 AM   #600 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 439
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unipidity View Post
500 tons sounds like the ground-effect sea skimming Russian plane whose designation or name I have forgotten. The huge one.

That also had 8 turbojets, I think. And perhaps had an amphibious assault role?

Edit:

Looked it up; Ekranoplans. The 'Caspian Sea Monster'. And you meants 100m, not 100ft.
Congrats`!! It was the Ekranoplan. It was over 300 ft long too That is what you do when you post early morning, you stick (a) in instead of a three! It used the WIG concept-Wing In Ground effect principle for flight.

The picture is of a version called Lun, which was an AShM carrier.

Your question
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (53.2 KB, 22 views)
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Random Thoughts on the Mighty Hog - Part 2 Shipwreck Military Aviation 114 07-26-2008 08:15 AM
Worlds Smallest Political Quiz... nickshepAK Political Discussions 58 04-08-2008 00:17 AM
TV & Movie Quiz Ironduke World Affairs Board Pub 5 12-09-2007 18:53 PM
Articles and links for the Military Professional Officer of Engineers The Staff College 115 11-20-2006 11:28 AM
4 Army Aviation Squadron tarek South Asian Defense Topics 3 12-23-2004 18:30 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:30 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8