![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
|
Answering Michael Moore
RustyBattleship wanted me to post this as response to those who think that huge chunks of wreckage should have remained from the plane the crashed into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
|
Quote:
Sandia National Labs: News Room: Resources: Video Gallery if you lost the original |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
|
As Dectilion said, the wing tips. That's what was left afterwards.
The rest of that Phantom was literally dust and debris probably no bigger than a baseball. Which is what tends to happen to aircraft when they smack into something sufficiently hard enough (like a thick concrete wall) at a sufficiently high enough speed. They turn into a smear on the pavement, like this DC-8 did in Sacramento ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
|
If you watch the video closly you can see one camera is mounted on top of the concrete block and continues fliming as the tail section of the plane crashes into the block.
__________________
Facts to a liberal is like Kryptonite to Superman. -- Larry Elder |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
|
Great video!
I get tired of explaining to people WHY there were no huge chunks of flight 93 left after it hit the Pentagon. Some people just don`t get it. People have pointed to other crash sites and said "Look, there are the engines and other parts, where were they from flight 93?". My response is always this, the amount of large pieces of wreckage depends on velocity at impact, angle of impact, physical integrity of the structure before impact and the characteristics of the medium the plane hits, ie ground, concrete, wooded area, etc..And fire. There is no Holy Grail, no single example of what a crash scene is "supposed" to look like after a plane goes down. Flight 93 didn`t vaporize, it rather disintegrated into fist sized pieces. That F-4 was doing 500mph, with no offset angle into a piece of concrete designed to take the impact. The Pentagon, although maybe reinforced, is NOT a nuclear pile shield! If it was, we could have expected similar results as in the F-4 test, maybe....We didn`t see wreckage because not many photos` have been released. It isn`t good for confidence when the seat of military power in the West is broken up on camera. I saw a great quote once on the Pentagon terrorist attack..."It`s called America the beautiful because we always pick up our litter before we take a photograph".
__________________
"Liberty is a thing beyond all price. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
Through sheer luck, the Pentagon was actually undergoing a massive renovation to reinforce the walls. The plane actually hit the first and only side that was done.
There are a few pictures floating around of what little debris there was. I remember seeing a landing gear or wheel, and maybe part of an engine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
[quote=Gun Grape;433192]You can get it at
Sandia National Labs: News Room: Resources: Video Gallery The outdoor museum at Sandia is well worth a visit.
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
|
Yep, I have seen those pictures before. I would expect that the largest debris chunks would be landing gear sections (Titanium forgings) and engine components.
The first picture was the subject of "conspiracy theorists". They described the component as a generator, one that was never fitted to the type of aircraft that crashed into the Pentagon. Well, a quick look at any surviving manufacturers I.D.plates would sort that out...also bear in mind that non-standard uprated gear is sometimes fitted if it is rated and cleared, non-OEM stuff. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Radical Left’s War on Gitmo and America | Leader | Political Discussions | 0 | 06-18-2005 11:34 AM |
| Why We Are in Iraq | Leader | The War in Iraq | 107 | 12-16-2004 21:23 PM |
| Michael Moore admits Disney 'ban' was a stunt | Ironduke | Current Affairs | 5 | 07-11-2004 22:37 PM |
| Michael Moore: The Lair | Leader | Political Discussions | 48 | 06-02-2004 06:41 AM |
| Britain’s Anti-American, Anti-Israel, Michael Moore Conservatives | Leader | Political Discussions | 1 | 05-26-2004 05:30 AM |