2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-01-2007, 20:45 PM   #1 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,691
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Answering Michael Moore

RustyBattleship wanted me to post this as response to those who think that huge chunks of wreckage should have remained from the plane the crashed into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001

Quote:
F-4 vs. Concrete wall-500 mph

When you view this clip you'll get a good feel for what happens to an airplane when it hits a concrete wall. Many of you have seen the Michael Moore-sequel website that asks the question; 'If it'strue that a Boeing airliner hit the Pentagon, what happened to all the parts of it? Why did we not find more pieces of it?

Where did all that mass GO? Well, for those who question what happened to
all the mass of that airplane,watch. It's an Air Force engineering test of a concrete barrier that was to surround a nuclear reactor dome, to see if it would indeed survive an aerial attack. With the high speed cameras rolling, they attached an F-4 Phantom to the sled and then pumped up the speed to 500 MPH. and... 'What happens when an 'Unstoppable Force' meets an 'Immovable object'?'

Watch in slow motion as the F-4 turns to vapor. You'll play it more than
once just to believe it. Where did all the flying parts go
TopHatter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2007, 21:32 PM   #2 (permalink)
Jimmy
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-16-05
Posts: 929
Country:
I absolutely love that video. I used to have it on my hard drive, too.
Jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2007, 21:56 PM   #3 (permalink)
Feanor
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
Do you have footage of what's left afterwards? This vid. stops right after the explosion that obscures everything.
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2007, 22:24 PM   #4 (permalink)
Gun Grape
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
 
Gun Grape's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-12-05
Location: Panama City Fl
Posts: 2,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
I absolutely love that video. I used to have it on my hard drive, too.
You can get it at

Sandia National Labs: News Room: Resources: Video Gallery

if you lost the original
Gun Grape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2007, 22:27 PM   #5 (permalink)
Dectilion
Regular
 
Join Date: 01-13-07
Posts: 137
i love how the tips of the wings are a bit wider than the concrete block, and keep going straight forward after the hit
__________________
ROAD WARRIOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dectilion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2007, 23:39 PM   #6 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,691
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor View Post
Do you have footage of what's left afterwards?
As Dectilion said, the wing tips. That's what was left afterwards.

The rest of that Phantom was literally dust and debris probably no bigger than a baseball.

Which is what tends to happen to aircraft when they smack into something sufficiently hard enough (like a thick concrete wall) at a sufficiently high enough speed.

They turn into a smear on the pavement, like this DC-8 did in Sacramento

TopHatter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2007, 00:23 AM   #7 (permalink)
Jimmy
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-16-05
Posts: 929
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Grape View Post
You can get it at

Sandia National Labs: News Room: Resources: Video Gallery

if you lost the original
Awesome, thanks! They actually had one that was a lot better than my copy, which had some guy narrating and only showed 2 or 3 camera angles.
Jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2007, 07:57 AM   #8 (permalink)
smilingassassin
Senior Contributor
 
smilingassassin's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-12-03
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 2,718
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor View Post
Do you have footage of what's left afterwards? This vid. stops right after the explosion that obscures everything.
If you watch the video closly you can see one camera is mounted on top of the concrete block and continues fliming as the tail section of the plane crashes into the block.
__________________
Facts to a liberal is like Kryptonite to Superman.

-- Larry Elder
smilingassassin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2007, 08:47 AM   #9 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 396
Country:
Great video!
I get tired of explaining to people WHY there were no huge chunks of flight 93 left after it hit the Pentagon. Some people just don`t get it.
People have pointed to other crash sites and said "Look, there are the engines and other parts, where were they from flight 93?".

My response is always this, the amount of large pieces of wreckage depends on velocity at impact, angle of impact, physical integrity of the structure before impact and the characteristics of the medium the plane hits, ie ground, concrete, wooded area, etc..And fire.
There is no Holy Grail, no single example of what a crash scene is "supposed" to look like after a plane goes down.

Flight 93 didn`t vaporize, it rather disintegrated into fist sized pieces. That F-4 was doing 500mph, with no offset angle into a piece of concrete designed to take the impact. The Pentagon, although maybe reinforced, is NOT a nuclear pile shield! If it was, we could have expected similar results as in the F-4 test, maybe....We didn`t see wreckage because not many photos` have been released. It isn`t good for confidence when the seat of military power in the West is broken up on camera.

I saw a great quote once on the Pentagon terrorist attack..."It`s called America the beautiful because we always pick up our litter before we take a photograph".
__________________
"Liberty is a thing beyond all price.
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2007, 13:14 PM   #10 (permalink)
Jimmy
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-16-05
Posts: 929
Country:
Through sheer luck, the Pentagon was actually undergoing a massive renovation to reinforce the walls. The plane actually hit the first and only side that was done.

There are a few pictures floating around of what little debris there was. I remember seeing a landing gear or wheel, and maybe part of an engine.
Jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2007, 13:25 PM   #11 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,512
[quote=Gun Grape;433192]You can get it at

Sandia National Labs: News Room: Resources: Video Gallery

The outdoor museum at Sandia is well worth a visit.
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.
glyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2007, 14:12 PM   #12 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,691
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
There are a few pictures floating around of what little debris there was. I remember seeing a landing gear or wheel, and maybe part of an engine.
Yep, on the nose.




TopHatter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2007, 15:39 PM   #13 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 396
Country:
Yep, I have seen those pictures before. I would expect that the largest debris chunks would be landing gear sections (Titanium forgings) and engine components.
The first picture was the subject of "conspiracy theorists". They described the component as a generator, one that was never fitted to the type of aircraft that crashed into the Pentagon. Well, a quick look at any surviving manufacturers I.D.plates would sort that out...also bear in mind that non-standard uprated gear is sometimes fitted if it is rated and cleared, non-OEM stuff.
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 11:29 AM   #14 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by TIN MAN View Post
... The first picture was the subject of "conspiracy theorists". They described the component as a generator, one that was never fitted to the type of aircraft that crashed into the Pentagon.
It's actually a piece of the first compressor stage of the RR engine.
__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar...
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 12:50 PM   #15 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,512
Hooray, Highsea is back He shines like a good deed in a dark and naughty world. Three cheers for maturity.
glyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Radical Left’s War on Gitmo and America Leader Political Discussions 0 06-18-2005 11:34 AM
Why We Are in Iraq Leader The War in Iraq 107 12-16-2004 21:23 PM
Michael Moore admits Disney 'ban' was a stunt Ironduke Current Affairs 5 07-11-2004 22:37 PM
Michael Moore: The Lair Leader Political Discussions 48 06-02-2004 06:41 AM
Britain’s Anti-American, Anti-Israel, Michael Moore Conservatives Leader Political Discussions 1 05-26-2004 05:30 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8