2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-03-2007, 04:44 AM   #1 (permalink)
gamercube
Contributor
 
gamercube's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-20-06
Location: Barbados
Posts: 696
Country:
Land based SAM systems against fighter jets?

I was wondering whether batteries of SAM missiles (specifically the Akash missile, link here: AKASH) can be used to bring down enemy aircraft like the F-16/J-10/J-7 etc. According to the website, the missile has an intercept range of 30 km, is fire-and-forget, which makes it immune to electronic countermeasures, and a speed of Mach 2.6, which is more than enough to catch many fighter aircraft.

Would it be possible to deploy thousands of batteries of these effectively against an enemy who has a numerical advantage in terms of air power? They certainly seem much cheaper/less maintenance intensive to build and deploy than aircraft.
__________________
Hasta la Victoria siempre!
gamercube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 14:28 PM   #2 (permalink)
Jimmy
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-16-05
Posts: 913
Country:
They're considerably easier and cheaper to destroy, too. JDAMs have hit targets from further than 30km. And that's just a guided bomb, not even powered. Any proper defense will have different layers, not just a lot of any one thing. What happens when the enemy figures out what frequency to jam? Now your entire air defense system is useless.

Fire-and-forget is not at all immune to electronic attack, you just have to jam it before it launches. Or jam the seeker. More difficult, but not at all impossible.
Jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 15:21 PM   #3 (permalink)
Silent Hunter
Contributor
 
Silent Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-09-07
Location: London, UK
Posts: 501
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Silent Hunter
Just what would it take to down a B2?
Silent Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 16:15 PM   #4 (permalink)
gamercube
Contributor
 
gamercube's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-20-06
Location: Barbados
Posts: 696
Country:
Quote:
JDAMs have hit targets from further than 30km. And that's just a guided bomb, not even powered.
According to wiki (JDAM) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. the max range of JDAM is 24 km. So a SAM having a range of 30 km or more would see the jet before the pilot had time to attack the SAM battery, right?

Quote:
Fire-and-forget is not at all immune to electronic attack, you just have to jam it before it launches. Or jam the seeker. More difficult, but not at all impossible.
Hmm....But what if multiple SAM batteries were deployed against you? Say that you haven't been able to destroy the SAM using JDAMs, and 3 missiles have been fired at you. If you jam the seeker of one, would you get rid of all three missiles? Or do they employ different seeker frequencies on each missile? Or do you have to jam each missile separately? Also, would it be a realistic scenario for a pilot to jam all 3 incoming missiles, and then target the ground based battery successfully?
gamercube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 16:23 PM   #5 (permalink)
Feanor
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
You would need an integrated AA screen consisting of strat-SAMs, tac-SAMs of various ranges, and large numbers of SAM/SPAAG hybrids for close up defense. You might want to look into Soviet anti-air systems if you want to learn more. They were the ones furthest along in that direction.
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 16:30 PM   #6 (permalink)
GGTharos
Contributor
 
Join Date: 10-06-06
Posts: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by gamercube View Post
According to wiki (JDAM) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. the max range of JDAM is 24 km. So a SAM having a range of 30 km or more would see the jet before the pilot had time to attack the SAM battery, right?
Nope. The pilot can go supersonic and toss that weapon from 60km away in the right aircraft.

Quote:
Hmm....But what if multiple SAM batteries were deployed against you? Say that you haven't been able to destroy the SAM using JDAMs, and 3 missiles have been fired at you. If you jam the seeker of one, would you get rid of all three missiles? Or do they employ different seeker frequencies on each missile? Or do you have to jam each missile separately? Also, would it be a realistic scenario for a pilot to jam all 3 incoming missiles, and then target the ground based battery successfully?
You turn around, light the burners and run - and you will outrun that missiles And yes, you CAN jam each missile separately. Most modern aircraft are capable of jamming multiple threats in each quadrant, though how many exactly is always classified.

You target the ground-based battery WELL before you enter its engagement zone, using your own radar, or known GPS data - you fly in, toss the bomb, turn around and run. And you'll likely not get hit ... 30km is against a head-on target. That missile, once the motor burns out it a big glider that does nothing other than slow down.

If you turn around and run at longer ranges, it will slow down too much to reach you. This is why all of this '30km intercept range' talk means nothing: A tactical fighter will be engaged closer to the battery because it can simply escape the missile by running away.
GGTharos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 17:05 PM   #7 (permalink)
gamercube
Contributor
 
gamercube's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-20-06
Location: Barbados
Posts: 696
Country:
Quote:
You turn around, light the burners and run - and you will outrun that missiles And yes, you CAN jam each missile separately. Most modern aircraft are capable of jamming multiple threats in each quadrant, though how many exactly is always classified.

You target the ground-based battery WELL before you enter its engagement zone, using your own radar, or known GPS data - you fly in, toss the bomb, turn around and run. And you'll likely not get hit ... 30km is against a head-on target. That missile, once the motor burns out it a big glider that does nothing other than slow down.

If you turn around and run at longer ranges, it will slow down too much to reach you. This is why all of this '30km intercept range' talk means nothing: A tactical fighter will be engaged closer to the battery because it can simply escape the missile by running away.
Ahh....Thanks for explaining that, it was very helpful.

One more question though, what's the best SAM in service right now, and is it beatable using the tactics you mentioned above?
gamercube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 17:19 PM   #8 (permalink)
Feanor
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
Best SAM in whose service?
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 17:34 PM   #9 (permalink)
gamercube
Contributor
 
gamercube's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-20-06
Location: Barbados
Posts: 696
Country:
re

Any service, anywhere in the world.
gamercube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 18:11 PM   #10 (permalink)
GGTharos
Contributor
 
Join Date: 10-06-06
Posts: 357
Any SAM is 'beatable' using these tactics, which is why you need an Air defense net, traps and tricks - SAMs will often not light up their radars until they get a cue from IADS that an enemy aircraft is well within their kill zone. So you can get a nasty surprise all of the sudden, and now you get a bit of a cat and mouse game ...

As for the best SAM? I wouldn't know - I don't think anyone does.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gamercube View Post
Ahh....Thanks for explaining that, it was very helpful.

One more question though, what's the best SAM in service right now, and is it beatable using the tactics you mentioned above?
GGTharos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 18:47 PM   #11 (permalink)
Jimmy
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-16-05
Posts: 913
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silent Hunter View Post
Just what would it take to down a B2?
What kind of an answer are you looking for here?
Jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 19:24 PM   #12 (permalink)
Feanor
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
Well if the B-2 pilot is sitting there zoned out on LSD you could do it with a Foxhound. Any service anywhere in the world? I don't know. I like the S-400, or atleast what its supposed to be on paper. If it actually does all that it;s a pretty impressive SAM.
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2007, 07:51 AM   #13 (permalink)
Silent Hunter
Contributor
 
Silent Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-09-07
Location: London, UK
Posts: 501
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Silent Hunter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
What kind of an answer are you looking for here?
A SAM system, mainly.
Silent Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2007, 15:55 PM   #14 (permalink)
urmomma158
the real plastic
Senior Contributor
 
urmomma158's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-05-06
Location: NJ Turnpike
Posts: 936
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silent Hunter View Post
Just what would it take to down a B2?
Well that's a pretty difficult answer it depends on the B-2's weapons,support,flight profile etc. Also depends on the layout of your air defense system. A simple tactic would be to get a VHF radar to detect it and send a fighter at the B-2 or place a SAM trap along it's flight path however the effectiveness of the SAM trap will depend on how good your CCD is and the capability of the enemy's sensor systems.A fighter sent along the flight path of the B-2 would be risky since there will probabaly be a pack of F-22's guarding it, ready to fire AMRAAMS at any incoming plane.Also your VHF radar cannot target which is why you'll have to suprise it at close range with an IR sesnsor or X band radar.A B-2 can deploy over 200 SDB's which can belaunched at 40nm wheres the F-22 can carry eight a piece and due to its supercruise launch them from 60nm. There is no simple solution in defeating a stealth aircraft.
__________________
urmomma158 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2007, 16:57 PM   #15 (permalink)
Feanor
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by urmomma158 View Post
There is no simple solution in defeating a stealth aircraft.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor View Post
Well if the B-2 pilot is sitting there zoned out on LSD
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
INDIA’S NEW "COLD START" WAR DOCTRINE STRATEGICALLY REVIEWED Ray Land Forces 125 06-20-2008 23:33 PM
DoD Daily Contracts Ironduke The Western Alliance 10 05-30-2007 21:59 PM
USN SSDS(Ship Self Defense System) Anon Naval Forces 1 02-18-2006 23:46 PM
JSF vs Rafale vs EF-2000 indianguy4u Military Aviation 7 08-29-2005 04:33 AM
Who needs the USN? rickusn Naval Forces 10 07-05-2005 00:47 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:15 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8