![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
|
Land based SAM systems against fighter jets?
I was wondering whether batteries of SAM missiles (specifically the Akash missile, link here: AKASH) can be used to bring down enemy aircraft like the F-16/J-10/J-7 etc. According to the website, the missile has an intercept range of 30 km, is fire-and-forget, which makes it immune to electronic countermeasures, and a speed of Mach 2.6, which is more than enough to catch many fighter aircraft.
Would it be possible to deploy thousands of batteries of these effectively against an enemy who has a numerical advantage in terms of air power? They certainly seem much cheaper/less maintenance intensive to build and deploy than aircraft.
__________________
Hasta la Victoria siempre! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
They're considerably easier and cheaper to destroy, too. JDAMs have hit targets from further than 30km. And that's just a guided bomb, not even powered. Any proper defense will have different layers, not just a lot of any one thing. What happens when the enemy figures out what frequency to jam? Now your entire air defense system is useless.
Fire-and-forget is not at all immune to electronic attack, you just have to jam it before it launches. Or jam the seeker. More difficult, but not at all impossible. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | ||
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Banished
|
You would need an integrated AA screen consisting of strat-SAMs, tac-SAMs of various ranges, and large numbers of SAM/SPAAG hybrids for close up defense. You might want to look into Soviet anti-air systems if you want to learn more. They were the ones furthest along in that direction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | ||
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
Quote:
And yes, you CAN jam each missile separately. Most modern aircraft are capable of jamming multiple threats in each quadrant, though how many exactly is always classified.You target the ground-based battery WELL before you enter its engagement zone, using your own radar, or known GPS data - you fly in, toss the bomb, turn around and run. And you'll likely not get hit ... 30km is against a head-on target. That missile, once the motor burns out it a big glider that does nothing other than slow down. If you turn around and run at longer ranges, it will slow down too much to reach you. This is why all of this '30km intercept range' talk means nothing: A tactical fighter will be engaged closer to the battery because it can simply escape the missile by running away. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
![]() One more question though, what's the best SAM in service right now, and is it beatable using the tactics you mentioned above? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
|
Any SAM is 'beatable' using these tactics, which is why you need an Air defense net, traps and tricks - SAMs will often not light up their radars until they get a cue from IADS that an enemy aircraft is well within their kill zone. So you can get a nasty surprise all of the sudden, and now you get a bit of a cat and mouse game ...
As for the best SAM? I wouldn't know - I don't think anyone does. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Banished
|
Well if the B-2 pilot is sitting there zoned out on LSD you could do it with a Foxhound. Any service anywhere in the world? I don't know. I like the S-400, or atleast what its supposed to be on paper. If it actually does all that it;s a pretty impressive SAM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
the real plastic
Senior Contributor
|
Well that's a pretty difficult answer it depends on the B-2's weapons,support,flight profile etc. Also depends on the layout of your air defense system. A simple tactic would be to get a VHF radar to detect it and send a fighter at the B-2 or place a SAM trap along it's flight path however the effectiveness of the SAM trap will depend on how good your CCD is and the capability of the enemy's sensor systems.A fighter sent along the flight path of the B-2 would be risky since there will probabaly be a pack of F-22's guarding it, ready to fire AMRAAMS at any incoming plane.Also your VHF radar cannot target which is why you'll have to suprise it at close range with an IR sesnsor or X band radar.A B-2 can deploy over 200 SDB's which can belaunched at 40nm wheres the F-22 can carry eight a piece and due to its supercruise launch them from 60nm. There is no simple solution in defeating a stealth aircraft.
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| INDIA’S NEW "COLD START" WAR DOCTRINE STRATEGICALLY REVIEWED | Ray | Land Forces | 125 | 06-20-2008 23:33 PM |
| DoD Daily Contracts | Ironduke | The Western Alliance | 10 | 05-30-2007 21:59 PM |
| USN SSDS(Ship Self Defense System) | Anon | Naval Forces | 1 | 02-18-2006 23:46 PM |
| JSF vs Rafale vs EF-2000 | indianguy4u | Military Aviation | 7 | 08-29-2005 04:33 AM |
| Who needs the USN? | rickusn | Naval Forces | 10 | 07-05-2005 00:47 AM |