Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 44

Thread: Plaaf

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    10 Jun 07
    Posts
    69

    Plaaf

    China's airforce

    Fighters: 1166

    J11 - 96
    J10 - 100
    SU30MK - 100
    Su27 - 70 ~
    J8(Enlarged version of J7) - 300~
    J7(Based on Mig21) - 500+

    Attack: 400~

    Q5 - 400+

    Bombers: 130 ~

    JH7(Fighter Bomber) - 70~
    H6(Bomber) - 60+

    Trainer : 400+
    Nanchang CJ-6 - 400+



    Is it only me or is the PLAAF very overrated..
    Out of 1166 fighters , 800 are just versions of Mig-21 , only about 366 are a serius threat.

    Those Q5 attack plane are old too.

    Im not saying Chinese air force is not strong , it is 1 of the strongest in the world , but I see only 366 good fighters there , counting the chinese pilot training and no talent I just dont see PLAAF as a serius threat to any of these country's : USA , Russia , UK , India , Israel , even France and Germany.

    What do you guys think could PLAAF be a threat to us , cuz i doubt it.

  2. #2
    Regular
    Join Date
    13 Nov 06
    Posts
    115
    I am pretty sure those number are quite a bit low. Do not have my desktop with me or I could give you exacts, but those are not correct at all.

    W

  3. #3
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    21,348
    JH7 can barely take off.

    Q5 is a modified MiG-19, or J6, with a small bomb load.
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  4. #4
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    16 Nov 05
    Posts
    1,903
    And if they get just 20% off the ground in an offensive surge, who is in a position to stop them?

    You dont consider that a threat?

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    12 Jun 07
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    2,297
    Well given the outdated-ness of those aircraft, any decent A screen would shred the Chinese airforce. The unfortunate truth happens to be that the U.S. does not truly have an integrated AA screen which is why the question even arises.

    Until they modernize that airforce, or increase size by alot, its worthless, given it has to provide cover for a huge land army.

  6. #6
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,965
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
    And if they get just 20% off the ground in an offensive surge, who is in a position to stop them?
    Anybody who's awake?
    Chimo

  7. #7
    Senior Contributor texasjohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    28 Jul 06
    Location
    Arlington, TX
    Posts
    1,244
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
    And if they get just 20% off the ground in an offensive surge, who is in a position to stop them?

    You dont consider that a threat?
    I would consider that a "turkey shoot" for the USAF. Quite possibly for the Taiwanese Air Force also.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    10 Jun 07
    Posts
    69
    Quote Originally Posted by texasjohn View Post
    I would consider that a "turkey shoot" for the USAF. Quite possibly for the Taiwanese Air Force also.


  9. #9
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    16 Nov 05
    Posts
    1,903
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    Anybody who's awake?
    Lets say you had some pretty good intel that something big was going down in the A2A arena. So you put up a hefty DCA CAP...lets say 12 F-15Cs. That's a big move right there. Now lets say China's first wave will be primarily J7s and J8s. Sticking to the 1/5 rule we're using here, that's 160 planes.

    How many missiles do you have? Ooooh, yeah...there could be a few problems here. You'd basically have to launch an entire squadron and pray for 100% pK to even knock out the fodder in the first waves. Then you've got the Flankers and the rest of the modernized PLAAF to contend with. Unless you really want to buy the merge on a MASSIVE scale so you can try to save your BVR shots for their more capable aircraft.



    Granted, a strike that size is not exactly likely (or probably even possible), but you dont plan for what you want to happen, you plan for what COULD happen.
    Last edited by Jimmy; 27 Jun 07, at 02:27.

  10. #10
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,965
    Whoaaaaa!!!! Jimmy, the biggest exercise I've seen the PLAAF acheived was 40 planes.
    Chimo

  11. #11
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    21,348
    Isn't there also the issue of concentrating so many planes in a small theater as not feasible?

    China has other border concerns to worry about. PLAAF simply cannot put that many assets in a small region without compromising other parts of the borders or even political stability.
    Last edited by gunnut; 27 Jun 07, at 04:01.
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  12. #12
    Military Professional wabpilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    05 Dec 03
    Location
    Commuting between Dresden and Ft. Worth
    Posts
    620
    Quote Originally Posted by FiRepower View Post
    What do you guys think could PLAAF be a threat to us , cuz i doubt it.
    In truth, the Su-30s, Su-27s and H-6s are the only offensive air threat in the PLAAF inventory. The H-6s are not much of a threat. Their surface to surface missiles are a bigger threat, but only to the ROC. The PLAAF, like the PLAN and PLA have a long way to go before they amount to much.

  13. #13
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    16 Nov 05
    Posts
    1,903
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    Whoaaaaa!!!! Jimmy, the biggest exercise I've seen the PLAAF acheived was 40 planes.
    I wasnt shooting for realism. I was making the point that its not impossible to overwhelm an enemy with numbers, even if 80% of your toys are complete junk. Nobody flies a 12-ship DCA CAP. That's a logistical nightmare. But even if they surged "only" 40 planes, that would be more than a match for a more standard 4-ship CAP. At that point you're scrambling alert fighters and hoping there's not another wave after this one.

  14. #14

    Join Date
    05 Sep 05
    Posts
    643
    Quote Originally Posted by FiRepower View Post
    China's airforce

    Fighters: 1166

    J11 - 96
    J10 - 100
    SU30MK - 100
    Su27 - 70 ~
    J8(Enlarged version of J7) - 300~
    J7(Based on Mig21) - 500+

    Attack: 400~

    Q5 - 400+

    Bombers: 130 ~

    JH7(Fighter Bomber) - 70~
    H6(Bomber) - 60+

    Trainer : 400+
    Nanchang CJ-6 - 400+



    Is it only me or is the PLAAF very overrated..
    Out of 1166 fighters , 800 are just versions of Mig-21 , only about 366 are a serius threat.

    Those Q5 attack plane are old too.

    Im not saying Chinese air force is not strong , it is 1 of the strongest in the world , but I see only 366 good fighters there , counting the chinese pilot training and no talent I just dont see PLAAF as a serius threat to any of these country's : USA , Russia , UK , India , Israel , even France and Germany.

    What do you guys think could PLAAF be a threat to us , cuz i doubt it.
    J-8F are not versions of Mig-21. When equipped with PL-12, they are just as capable as any other upgraded 3rd generation plane equipped with ARH missiles.

    In truth, the Su-30s, Su-27s and H-6s are the only offensive air threat in the PLAAF inventory. The H-6s are not much of a threat. Their surface to surface missiles are a bigger threat, but only to the ROC. The PLAAF, like the PLAN and PLA have a long way to go before they amount to much.
    the main attacking A2G/A2S asset in plaaf/planaf is JH-7A. the main A2A assets are J-10/J-11B.

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    12 Jun 07
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    2,297
    3rd gen planes are horribly out of date. Militaries that actually have decent hardware usually use 4+ gen and the U.S. Russia and EU all have 5th gen projects, the U.S. one already finished. 3rd gen are completely worthless unless modernized VERY heavily.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Interview with PLAAF LGen Liu Yazhou
    By Officer of Engineers in forum The Field Mess
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04 Jun 11,, 19:09
  2. India+Russia vs. China+Pakistan
    By Kontakt Era in forum Ground Warfare
    Replies: 149
    Last Post: 17 Apr 08,, 23:48
  3. Kj-2000 Modified Plaaf Il-76 Awacs Plane Crashes
    By vinay60000 in forum Military Aviation
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 29 Jul 06,, 02:05
  4. An honest review of chinese capability of PLAAF & indegenoius R&D.
    By indianguy4u in forum Military Aviation
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 29 Nov 05,, 01:21
  5. The Future PLAAF?
    By -{SpoonmaN}- in forum Military Aviation
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 23 Nov 04,, 06:00

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •