![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
| View Poll Results: Rafale vs Hornet | |||
| Rafale (all variants) |
|
34 | 45.95% |
| F-18 Hornet (all variants) |
|
40 | 54.05% |
| Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
HürGeneral
Senior Contributor
|
Rafale vs F-18 which plane you would like to take?
vs ![]() i wonder a comparison between French Rafale vs F-18 with every versions and guns.. which is a better dog fighter? better gun platform? can we make a full comparison?
__________________
When i say, there will be no effect but i am not willing to remain silent. -Fuzuli |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,089
Country:
|
I think the F-18 is a better bomb truck. Rafale is probably better at a2a role. But the problem is Rafale is very French. Some people don't like to buy non-standard gear.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
|
I'm no fan of the French, but there is nothing I would to see more than a "super Rafale" protecting our carriers. The performance the Super Hornet gives up to make it a first class ground attack makes it unsuitable to fulfill the role vacated by the Tomcat. A lengthened and F414 powered version of the Rafale with the block II super hornet electronics package can.
__________________
F/A-18E/F Super Hornet: The Honda Accord of fighters. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
Besides, the SH's much lower RCS, AESA radar, HMS, benign handling qualities, AIM-120D+, and (potentially) large missile loadout compensates for its shortcomings in absolute kinematic performance. And there is room for improvements with the uprated F414s that are under development. It still doesn't have quite the legs of the Tomcat though. Plus, there's still the potential for the F-35C to take some of the fleet defense mission. With stealthy missile pods, it would be very capable in this role. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
Current Block II F-18s have a somewhat lower RCS (from what I've read) and significantly better radar (indisputable) than current Rafales. And AIM-120 is a better BVR round than MICA (especially AIM-120D). This means the F-18s have a first look and first shot advantage. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
You don't need backfires, just a good anti-ship missile and an aircraft to mount it on. The Falklands showed that. The Russians have the missiles and aircraft and are willing to sell to anyone dirt cheap. The Super Hornet is too slow to intercept them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
Stop bringing this up. For one thing, its not in service and wont be for a while. For another, nobody has the slightest idea what it will really be capable of. That data is above what you can find without a hefty clearance, so you can bet the internet rumors have little/no basis in reality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
|
F18's Electronics is very nice, specially block II, however I'm not so sure about the aerodynamics with the 3 degree wing flaw that it had?
I personally prefer Rafale, cockpit is also very nice.
__________________
www.techenclave.com I'm very much gentleman :) Opteron 146 EPAW (Venus SH-E4)||Asus A8N32 SLI Deluxe (Rev 1.02 & BIOS 1205)||Twinmos 1Gb Ram (2-3-3-5)||Geforce 6800Ultra (NV40C)||Creative X-FI Platinum||Seagate 7200.10 320GB SATA II (ST3300622AS)||Samsung 40Gb PATA (SP0411N)||Sony CDRW CRX230EE||SONY DVD-ROM DDU1621||Benq 1650||Antec NeoHE 500 Watts||Antec P180 (Custom Modded with Thermaltake Blue LED Smartfan and New Front Panel)||LG Flatron 775FT||Samsung Generic Keyboard||Copperhead |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
|
F-18 all day every day, and twice on sunday
For the F-18 engine to be soo underpowered, its funny that the Rafale A did most of its test flights with the same F404 engine. Ben, Once again you claim that the F-18 won't be able to catch enemy planes or missiles. Why not? Is the 120C-5 on a SuperHornet slower than the AIM-120 on other aircraft? As for which is better. Those that know have already decided. And its not Rafale. How many countries fly the Rafale? 1 How many Fly the F-18? 8 Not bad for a carrier plane, since only one of those countries have a carrier. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| B-17's over Germany (WW ll) | vaughn | The World Wars | 0 | 01-25-2007 17:09 PM |
| Unravelling the spin on a toy plane | Jay | Current Affairs | 6 | 12-14-2005 23:59 PM |
| JSF vs Rafale vs EF-2000 | indianguy4u | Military Aviation | 7 | 08-29-2005 04:33 AM |
| Which AC should India consider? | indianguy4u | South Asian Defense Topics | 19 | 06-21-2005 16:22 PM |
| Pakistani Terror Camp in Action | Ray | Political Discussions | 14 | 11-18-2004 05:28 AM |