2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
View Poll Results: Rafale vs Hornet
Rafale (all variants) 34 45.95%
F-18 Hornet (all variants) 40 54.05%
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-25-2007, 04:34 AM   #1 (permalink)
Big K
HürGeneral
Senior Contributor
 
Big K's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-11-06
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 1,042
Country:
Send a message via Skype™ to Big K
Rafale vs F-18 which plane you would like to take?



vs



i wonder a comparison between French Rafale vs F-18 with every versions and guns..

which is a better dog fighter? better gun platform?

can we make a full comparison?
__________________
When i say, there will be no effect but i am not willing to remain silent.
-Fuzuli
Big K is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 04:48 AM   #2 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,089
Country:
I think the F-18 is a better bomb truck. Rafale is probably better at a2a role. But the problem is Rafale is very French. Some people don't like to buy non-standard gear.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 05:47 AM   #3 (permalink)
Injecteer
Patron
 
Injecteer's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-01-04
Posts: 190
I wonder, why are french so fond of a delta-wing? Lack of financing for research teams?
Hell, even the EF2000 has one...
Injecteer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 06:35 AM   #4 (permalink)
Stan
Contributor
 
Stan's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-11-06
Posts: 348
Country:
i would take the f-18 every time but thats mainly because im still annoyed the french pulled out of the eurofighter.

oh well sucks for them
Stan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 07:03 AM   #5 (permalink)
Big K
HürGeneral
Senior Contributor
 
Big K's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-11-06
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 1,042
Country:
Send a message via Skype™ to Big K
Tech features

i hope i managed to send right file
Attached Files
File Type: doc New Microsoft Word Document (3).doc (40.0 KB, 30 views)
Big K is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 11:33 AM   #6 (permalink)
BenRoethig
Senior Contributor
 
BenRoethig's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-03-04
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 1,033
Country:
I'm no fan of the French, but there is nothing I would to see more than a "super Rafale" protecting our carriers. The performance the Super Hornet gives up to make it a first class ground attack makes it unsuitable to fulfill the role vacated by the Tomcat. A lengthened and F414 powered version of the Rafale with the block II super hornet electronics package can.
__________________
F/A-18E/F Super Hornet: The Honda Accord of fighters.
BenRoethig is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 11:34 AM   #7 (permalink)
BenRoethig
Senior Contributor
 
BenRoethig's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-03-04
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 1,033
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan View Post
i would take the f-18 every time but thats mainly because im still annoyed the french pulled out of the eurofighter.

oh well sucks for them
I'm no so sure of that. The configuration of the Typhoon makes it unsuitable for a couple missions including nuclear strike and recon.
BenRoethig is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 12:02 PM   #8 (permalink)
Big K
HürGeneral
Senior Contributor
 
Big K's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-11-06
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 1,042
Country:
Send a message via Skype™ to Big K
i think Rafale is one of the best looking fighter ever...
Big K is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 12:13 PM   #9 (permalink)
B.Smitty
Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-15-05
Location: Oak Hill, VA
Posts: 548
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenRoethig View Post
I'm no fan of the French, but there is nothing I would to see more than a "super Rafale" protecting our carriers. The performance the Super Hornet gives up to make it a first class ground attack makes it unsuitable to fulfill the role vacated by the Tomcat. A lengthened and F414 powered version of the Rafale with the block II super hornet electronics package can.
The role vacated by the Tomcat died with the end of the cold war. There are no large fleets of Backfires to contend with anymore.

Besides, the SH's much lower RCS, AESA radar, HMS, benign handling qualities, AIM-120D+, and (potentially) large missile loadout compensates for its shortcomings in absolute kinematic performance. And there is room for improvements with the uprated F414s that are under development.

It still doesn't have quite the legs of the Tomcat though.

Plus, there's still the potential for the F-35C to take some of the fleet defense mission. With stealthy missile pods, it would be very capable in this role.
B.Smitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 12:23 PM   #10 (permalink)
B.Smitty
Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-15-05
Location: Oak Hill, VA
Posts: 548
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
I think the F-18 is a better bomb truck. Rafale is probably better at a2a role. But the problem is Rafale is very French. Some people don't like to buy non-standard gear.
I disagree that the Rafale is a better a2a platform.

Current Block II F-18s have a somewhat lower RCS (from what I've read) and significantly better radar (indisputable) than current Rafales. And AIM-120 is a better BVR round than MICA (especially AIM-120D).

This means the F-18s have a first look and first shot advantage.
B.Smitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 12:33 PM   #11 (permalink)
BenRoethig
Senior Contributor
 
BenRoethig's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-03-04
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 1,033
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by B.Smitty View Post
The role vacated by the Tomcat died with the end of the cold war. There are no large fleets of Backfires to contend with anymore.

Besides, the SH's much lower RCS, AESA radar, HMS, benign handling qualities, AIM-120D+, and (potentially) large missile loadout compensates for its shortcomings in absolute kinematic performance. And there is room for improvements with the uprated F414s that are under development.

It still doesn't have quite the legs of the Tomcat though.

Plus, there's still the potential for the F-35C to take some of the fleet defense mission. With stealthy missile pods, it would be very capable in this role.

You don't need backfires, just a good anti-ship missile and an aircraft to mount it on. The Falklands showed that. The Russians have the missiles and aircraft and are willing to sell to anyone dirt cheap. The Super Hornet is too slow to intercept them.
BenRoethig is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 14:14 PM   #12 (permalink)
Jimmy
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-16-05
Posts: 911
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by B.Smitty View Post
(especially AIM-120D)
Stop bringing this up. For one thing, its not in service and wont be for a while. For another, nobody has the slightest idea what it will really be capable of. That data is above what you can find without a hefty clearance, so you can bet the internet rumors have little/no basis in reality.
Jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 14:28 PM   #13 (permalink)
joey
Senior Contributor
 
joey's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-25-06
Posts: 1,040
F18's Electronics is very nice, specially block II, however I'm not so sure about the aerodynamics with the 3 degree wing flaw that it had?

I personally prefer Rafale, cockpit is also very nice.
__________________
www.techenclave.com
I'm very much gentleman :)

Opteron 146 EPAW (Venus SH-E4)||Asus A8N32 SLI Deluxe (Rev 1.02 & BIOS 1205)||Twinmos 1Gb Ram (2-3-3-5)||Geforce 6800Ultra (NV40C)||Creative X-FI Platinum||Seagate 7200.10 320GB SATA II (ST3300622AS)||Samsung 40Gb PATA (SP0411N)||Sony CDRW CRX230EE||SONY DVD-ROM DDU1621||Benq 1650||Antec NeoHE 500 Watts||Antec P180 (Custom Modded with Thermaltake Blue LED Smartfan and New Front Panel)||LG Flatron 775FT||Samsung Generic Keyboard||Copperhead
joey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 16:52 PM   #14 (permalink)
Blademaster
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-15-03
Posts: 2,984
If the Rafale could have the F-18's avionics, it would be one hell of a bird.
Blademaster is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 18:33 PM   #15 (permalink)
Gun Grape
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
 
Gun Grape's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-12-05
Location: Panama City Fl
Posts: 2,566
F-18 all day every day, and twice on sunday

For the F-18 engine to be soo underpowered, its funny that the Rafale A did most of its test flights with the same F404 engine.

Ben, Once again you claim that the F-18 won't be able to catch enemy planes or missiles. Why not? Is the 120C-5 on a SuperHornet slower than the AIM-120 on other aircraft?

As for which is better. Those that know have already decided. And its not Rafale.

How many countries fly the Rafale? 1
How many Fly the F-18? 8

Not bad for a carrier plane, since only one of those countries have a carrier.
Gun Grape is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
B-17's over Germany (WW ll) vaughn The World Wars 0 01-25-2007 17:09 PM
Unravelling the spin on a toy plane Jay Current Affairs 6 12-14-2005 23:59 PM
JSF vs Rafale vs EF-2000 indianguy4u Military Aviation 7 08-29-2005 04:33 AM
Which AC should India consider? indianguy4u South Asian Defense Topics 19 06-21-2005 16:22 PM
Pakistani Terror Camp in Action Ray Political Discussions 14 11-18-2004 05:28 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:33 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8