![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
| View Poll Results: Should US Export F-22? | |||
| Yes |
|
66 | 42.86% |
| No |
|
88 | 57.14% |
| Voters: 154. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Geez, old man, take a chill pill. I was referring to the dominance part. Australia will remain dominant as long as it doesn't do anything stupid that would cause the ASEAN countries to band together and go against Australia.Talk about overreaction. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
Another No Vote
It's not that I wouldn't be in favor of some exceptions . . . it's just that once the US starts making exceptions (like selling a batch to Japan for example), everyone else in the neighborhood thinks they're entitled too (like S Korea).
It's simpler to just allow no exceptions and be done with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
|
That's because there never really was a reason to build up such a force. By the way, the Singapore Navy and Airforce is pretty decent. If used properly, it can be used to destroy any long range combat capability of Australia and leave Australia pretty much a brown water navy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
HKHolic
Senior Contributor
|
Who would spend that much? Would our allies really have a need for such an advanced and expensive aircraft for anything but a limited basis?
__________________
"The right man in the wrong place can make all the difference in the world. So wake up, Mr. Freeman. Wake up and smell the ashes." G-Man |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
I think that the Singapore armed forces have developed tremendously in the last decade but I would have thought they would be hard pressed to threaten Australia. At the same time I think that defensively they are strong enough to ensure that Australia could not threaten Singapore! By the way, I think Australia and Singapore are on excellent terms with each other and I don't see a situation arising where either country would threaten the other but it makes an interesting scenario. Cheers
__________________
Learn from the past. Prepare for the future. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
Strength and power projection are very different concepts. Singapore has some solid pilots, and they have a good understanding of what they can and cant do, and what they need to do to improve. I dont know how effective they would be outside of a relatively small area beyond their borders, however.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) | ||
|
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Quote:
It remains to be seen whether Malaysia can capitalize on its increased defence budget and continue its economic progress. If so, they have a very good chance of building a very respectable air force and navy. As for Indonesia, they have too many problems right now so they are pretty much a non-factor. But if Indonesia get its act together and get the economy rolling, then Australia should be very concerned and attempt to build friendly relations to Indonesia, hence, my early post about trying to dominate the area and warning of reverting to the "Whites Only" policy. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
I voted yes.
The thread has grown entertaining. Seems several fellow posters are resentful of Australia for something or other that occured in some previous century? Maybe the colonial repression of India. No that was U.K. Oh yeah, the Phillipines! No, that was Spain, then us Yanks. Indonesia? Weren't the wooden shoe'd minions of the House of Orange the antagonists there? Since I voted yes, I get to pick my clients: All the Anglo-states. In truth, Australia may need the Raptor before the brits do, since Indonesia will probably fall to new Caliphate before continental Europe does...by a few years at least. So... 1. Australia, (we may need to help with that but the Aussie's are on the frontline of the coming bloodletting. I was encouraged by their C-17 buy.) 2. U.K., (except that they are quickly reducing their defense budget to zero. Too bad. The RAF are the oldest, and probably highest quality outfit in the air. The gov has stabbed some valiant warriors in the back there, and they will be needed in the years to come.) ANY of the dependable posse of 'usual suspects' that have stood by us, (U.S.) over the last half century of holding back the dark: 3. Isreal and Singapore are both on the target list when the Mullahs launch their reign of terror, and both will live or die with the Anglo-bloc. Both will only move closer to the West in the years to come and be more threatened by immediate neghbors as those years go by. 4. Japan is far enough back from N.Korea and NEA mainland to be effective as a counterbalance but honestly, japan just dosn't need the damned plane. They could build one almost as good if they needed it but they don't. China is not on a course of conquest if 3,000 years of continual history is any guide. North Korea is following Cuba down the sewer and is no real threat to anyone's air force. S.Korea might could use the Raptor in the short term, but by the time they could build up a wing of the super fighters, N.Korea will cease to exist. That's it: I will sell MY Raptors to Australia, Singapore, Isreal and the U.K. (For God's sake, don't let me get control of U.S. foreign policy--I'd sell give away surplus boomer boats to the Aussies and sell anything in the catalog to the Indians.) |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| An insight into the US argument for the nuke deal | Asim Aquil | Political Discussions | 5 | 04-28-2006 15:16 PM |
| Myanmar predicts more export gain for 2005-06 | oneman28 | Political Discussions | 0 | 08-17-2005 15:08 PM |
| China's Export of machinery, electronic products soars in H1 | oneman28 | Political Discussions | 0 | 08-11-2005 11:07 AM |
| international students need licenses to use equipement in US | oneman28 | World Affairs Board Pub | 0 | 05-25-2005 14:13 PM |
| Developing countries’ goods trade share surges to 50-year peak | oneman28 | World Affairs Board Pub | 0 | 04-21-2005 13:58 PM |