2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-23-2007, 18:40 PM   #1 (permalink)
outofshdw
Regular
 
Join Date: 06-03-06
Posts: 53
Japan Lobbying for F-22 Buy

According to a number of recent articles (including this one from Aviation Week - 23 April 2007), Japan's military leadership has been insisting that the American F-22 should THE top contendor for Japan's next air superiority fighter. This is in spite of continued reluctance on the part of the US Congress to release the F-22 for export:
Japan's Military Wishlist

The article quotes US Gen Peter Pace, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff as saying: "I'm aware the Japanese are interested in the F-22. I'm also aware of our concerns about what we export and don't export of our high technologies. The Japanese are very close friends. We're committed to protecting Japan, so we'll work our way through it. We all need to be concerned about both ballistic and cruise missile defense. It's something that we . . . need to work on."

According to industry sources quoted by the article, "The U.S. Air Force and the Japanese Ministry of Defense want the sale to take place, but what's missing this time is someone pushing it at the State Dept. level. There needs to be political pressure, but right now there's no vocal advocate."

Other newspaper articles, meanwhile, have been reporting that Japan is expected to press the question of F-22 export approval during an upcoming summit with President Bush. Japan is reported to be considering a buy of up to 100 F-22s, if export approval were to be granted:
Japan wants the fighters US refused to sell Canberra | The World | The Australian
outofshdw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2007, 19:08 PM   #2 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,353
Country:
This oughtta set Asia on edge. A Japan with state of the art, 5th generation, stealth fighter with huge range, and in decent numbers.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2007, 19:24 PM   #3 (permalink)
Jimmy
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-16-05
Posts: 929
Country:
Good lord, 100? My jaw dropped at that one.
Jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2007, 19:26 PM   #4 (permalink)
Tronic
Navajo Code Talker
Senior Contributor
 
Tronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-27-04
Location: Patiala, India
Posts: 5,287
Country:
I don't see why Japan shouldn't be allowed them...
__________________
Nabha Sparasham Deeptam
-Touch The Sky With Glory
Tronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2007, 20:19 PM   #5 (permalink)
tphuang
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-05-05
Posts: 841
hmm, you obviously missed the many times that Japan got stuff stolen from them.
tphuang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2007, 20:24 PM   #6 (permalink)
Tronic
Navajo Code Talker
Senior Contributor
 
Tronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-27-04
Location: Patiala, India
Posts: 5,287
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tphuang View Post
hmm, you obviously missed the many times that Japan got stuff stolen from them.
mmm... Yeh, I probably did. But you mean to say that they have the capacity to get F-22s stolen from them?
Tronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2007, 20:30 PM   #7 (permalink)
Blademaster
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-15-03
Posts: 3,045
US should go for it. It will only help them in the long run. If Japan orders 100, it will lower the price drastically for US Air Force, allowing them to buy more, which in turn, lowers the price even more creating more incentive to buy more F-22s. The Pentagon should going out on all cylinders and getting Japan to buy the F-22s. Not only that, they should sell them to Australia. I am not sure about Israel. I hope Canada will buy those planes but highly unlikely.
Blademaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2007, 20:49 PM   #8 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,691
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tronic View Post
mmm... Yeh, I probably did. But you mean to say that they have the capacity to get F-22s stolen from them?
Well, there's stolen and then there's "stolen".

However, a point in the article intrigued me:

Quote:
Japan also faces the cost of integrating an anti-tamper kit on key technologies, including hardware and software, on the F-22. Estimates range from $600 million to $1.2 billion. Key software that would be protected, for example, manipulates and integrates the advanced, cruise missile-detecting radar and long-range electronic surveillance array, as well as the aircraft's other target-detection and analysis sensors.
Suprising that Japan is not just willing but "adament" to shell out that much dough for a hundred of them. I'm with Jimmy on this one. My jaw is on the floor.
TopHatter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2007, 23:39 PM   #9 (permalink)
tphuang
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-05-05
Posts: 841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tronic View Post
mmm... Yeh, I probably did. But you mean to say that they have the capacity to get F-22s stolen from them?
you don't need to loose F-22s, but if you loose certain performance specs and other confidential data on F-22. I'm sure there are plenty of such that USAF would not want to fall into PLA's hand, that is definitely not something you would want.
tphuang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2007, 08:32 AM   #10 (permalink)
nutter
Patron
 
Join Date: 05-27-06
Posts: 187
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tphuang View Post
hmm, you obviously missed the many times that Japan got stuff stolen from them.
You mean like how the russians stole nuclear secrets from US during/after WW2? :D
nutter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2007, 08:59 AM   #11 (permalink)
Tasman
Regular
 
Tasman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-24-07
Location: Hobart, Tasmania
Posts: 78
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blademaster View Post
US should go for it. It will only help them in the long run. If Japan orders 100, it will lower the price drastically for US Air Force, allowing them to buy more, which in turn, lowers the price even more creating more incentive to buy more F-22s. The Pentagon should going out on all cylinders and getting Japan to buy the F-22s. Not only that, they should sell them to Australia. I am not sure about Israel. I hope Canada will buy those planes but highly unlikely.
At this stage Australia's preference is to buy the JSF (F-35) as it is regarded as more versatile and more affordable for its requirement for 100 new fighters for the RAAF. There are, however, influential lobby groups in Australia who are pushing for the F-22 and the Federal Opposition Defence Spokesman has stated a preference for it. The letter to the Australian Defence Minister from the US Deputy Defence Secretary Gordon England stating that the US would not export the F-22 Raptor to Australia came about because the RAAF was looking at contingencies in case the JSF program was delayed. In the event Australia has ordered a small number of FA-18F Super Hornets to bridge any capability gap caused by a delay with the JSF.

If export bans are lifted I think Australia will still opt for the JSF as the backbone of its air combat force but might consider buying a small number of F-22s (say 25) as the top end of a two tier force. It is, however, a big 'might!'

Cheers
__________________
Learn from the past. Prepare for the future.

Last edited by Tasman : 04-25-2007 at 09:04 AM.
Tasman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2007, 19:41 PM   #12 (permalink)
Jimmy
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-16-05
Posts: 929
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by nutter View Post
You mean like how the russians stole nuclear secrets from US during/after WW2? :D
Hell, I'll point to China stealing nuclear secrets from the US in recent years. They know what they're doing, and they're damn good at it. The more countries that have the F-22, the more opportunities there are to get to it.
Jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 00:17 AM   #13 (permalink)
-{SpoonmaN}-
Death, the Destroyer of Worlds...
Senior Contributor
 
-{SpoonmaN}-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-08-04
Location: The badlands of West London.
Posts: 1,455
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasman View Post
At this stage Australia's preference is to buy the JSF (F-35) as it is regarded as more versatile and more affordable for its requirement for 100 new fighters for the RAAF. There are, however, influential lobby groups in Australia who are pushing for the F-22 and the Federal Opposition Defence Spokesman has stated a preference for it. The letter to the Australian Defence Minister from the US Deputy Defence Secretary Gordon England stating that the US would not export the F-22 Raptor to Australia came about because the RAAF was looking at contingencies in case the JSF program was delayed. In the event Australia has ordered a small number of FA-18F Super Hornets to bridge any capability gap caused by a delay with the JSF.

If export bans are lifted I think Australia will still opt for the JSF as the backbone of its air combat force but might consider buying a small number of F-22s (say 25) as the top end of a two tier force. It is, however, a big 'might!'

Cheers
I'd be willing to live with that, although I still consider the F-22 to be expensive overkill that'd only drag money out of other areas that need just as much attention. Simply put, there are no rivals to the RAAF in our region. Period. There aren't going to be for another 25 years.
If it were up to me I'd just buy 200 Super Hornets of different makes (F/A-18E and F, Growlers etc.) and spend the rest on the Army, Sealift airlift, which are our real problems.
__________________
"I have this to say to the people of Australia: Kick me, I'm different."
-{SpoonmaN}- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 04:10 AM   #14 (permalink)
AchtungSpitFire
Regular
 
AchtungSpitFire's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-30-05
Location: Virginia
Posts: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
This oughtta set Asia on edge. A Japan with state of the art, 5th generation, stealth fighter with huge range, and in decent numbers.
As long as they have a problem of splitting/fusing an atom as means of deterrence/force, Japan is irrelevant as military power in Asia.
AchtungSpitFire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2007, 09:07 AM   #15 (permalink)
Blademaster
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-15-03
Posts: 3,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by AchtungSpitFire View Post
As long as they have a problem of splitting/fusing an atom as means of deterrence/force, Japan is irrelevant as military power in Asia.
Goes to show how much you really know. Japan has the one military force that matters in the Far East: JSDMF. After USN, Japan has the most powerful navy that is capable of going against PLAN and with its 215 F-15s and 200s F-4a and F-2s and its E-3s, Japan can easily kill the PLAAF. As for nukes, Japan is under the US nuclear umbrella.
Blademaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Thank God for the Atom Bomb" Shek The World Wars 153 11-05-2007 01:36 AM
China, Japan agree on strategically reciprocal ties awangmamat International Defense Topics 2 04-15-2007 18:29 PM
World War ll Operation "Downfall" vaughn The Field Mess 5 07-19-2006 08:21 AM
US Encircling China? Ray Political Discussions 156 07-10-2005 22:04 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8