2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-27-2007, 12:26 PM   #46 (permalink)
HistoricalDavid
Distant Deeps or Skies
Senior Contributor
 
HistoricalDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-05
Location: North London, UK
Posts: 2,008
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catalan View Post
The United States has sold to China far more technology than Israel has sold to China. Furthermore, Israeli exports are monitored by the United States, and several exports attempts have been vetoed successfully by the United States. Israel sells less to China than Europe does (although Israel sells a lot to Europe).
Do you have specific military examples?

Quote:
This isn't the Cold War.
What do you mean by that?
HistoricalDavid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 13:24 PM   #47 (permalink)
WECIV
Regular
 
Join Date: 11-13-06
Posts: 88
Country:
As much support as Islamist are getting via China (and their little Pawn North Korea) it makes me feel like this is a Cold War.

W
WECIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 15:12 PM   #48 (permalink)
Jimmy
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-16-05
Posts: 930
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
Meaning the "bomber" is built to be a fighter by design. The B1 & B2 can handle the bombing runs however the F117 can do it pretty effeciently for being originally designed as a fighter more then a bomber.
I'm not disputing you, but I've never heard that before. Got a source?
Jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 15:26 PM   #49 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,329
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
I'm not disputing you, but I've never heard that before. Got a source?
Sure do.

F-117A Nighthawk Stealth Fighter Attack Aircraft, USA
The F-117A Nighthawk Stealth Fighter attack aircraft was developed by Lockheed Martin after work on stealth technology, and the predecessor test demonstrator aircraft, Have Blue, was carried out in secret from 1975.

Development of the F-117A began in 1978 and it was first flown in 1981, but it was not until 1988 that its existence was publicly announced. The Nighthawk is the world's first operational stealth aircraft. The first aircraft was delivered in 1982 and the last of the 59 Nighthawks procured by the US Air Force was received in 1990.

"The F-117A aircraft is also known as the Frisbee and the Wobblin' Goblin."The F-117A aircraft is also known as the Frisbee and the Wobblin' Goblin. The mission of the aircraft is to penetrate dense threat environments and attack high-value targets with high accuracy. Nighthawk has been in operational service in Panama, during Operation Desert Storm, in Kosovo, in Afghanistan and during Operation Iraqi Freedom.

The F-117 is being replaced in the USAF by the F-22 Raptor. The first 10 of the 55 F-117 aircraft in service were retired in December 2006. The remainder is scheduled to be retired by 2008.

In January 2004, an F-117 successfully released a JDAM (JDAM) 2,000lb bomb for the first time. The integration of JDAM and other precision-guided weapons on the F-117 is coupled with the block II software upgrade and is planned to achieve Initial Operating Capability (IOC) in mid-2006.

The Nighthawk is only used for night-time missions.

DESIGN

The surfaces and edge profiles are optimised to reflect hostile radar into narrow beam signals, directed away from the enemy radar detector. All the doors and opening panels on the aircraft have saw-toothed forward and trailing edges to reflect radar.

The aircraft is mainly constructed of aluminum, with titanium for areas of the engine and exhaust systems. The outer surface of the aircraft is coated with a Radar-Absorbent Material (RAM). The radar cross-section of the F-117 has been estimated at between 10cm² and 100cm².

The F-117A has four elevons on the inboard and outboard trailing edge of the wing. The V-shaped tail, which controls the yaw of the aircraft, acts as a flying tail, which means that the whole surface acts as a control surface. The elevons do not act as flaps to reduce the rate of descent for touchdown, so the landing speed of the F-117A is high, at about 180mph to 190mph, and a drag parachute is used.

"The Nighthawk's surfaces and edge profiles are optimised to reflect hostile radar."COCKPIT

The cockpit has a Kaiser Electronics Head-Up Display (HUD) and the flight deck is equipped with a large video monitor, which displays the infrared imagery from the aircraft's onboard sensors. The cockpit has a full-colour moving map developed by the Harris Corporation. The fly-by-wire system is supplied by BAE Systems Aircraft Controls.

WEAPONS

The aircraft can carry a range of tactical fighter ordnance in the weapons bay, including BLU-109B low-level laser-guided bomb, GBU-10 and GBU-27 laser-guided bomb units, Raytheon AGM-65 Maverick and Raytheon AGM-88 HARM air-to-surface missiles.

SENSORS

For stealth, the F-117A does not rely on radar for navigation or targeting. For navigation and weapon aiming, the aircraft is equipped with a Forward-Looking Infrared (FLIR) and a Downward-Looking Infrared (DLIR) with laser designator, supplied by Raytheon. The aircraft uses a Honeywell inertial navigation system.

The aircraft has multi-channel pilot static tubes installed in the nose. Multiple ports along the length of the tubes provide differential pressure readings. The flight control computers compare these in order to provide the aircraft's flight data.

FLIGHT MANAGEMENT

Before flight, mission data is downloaded on to the IBM AP-102 mission control computer, which integrates it with the navigation and flight controls to provide a fully automated flight management system.

After take-off, the pilot can hand over flight control to the mission program until within visual range of the mission's first target. The pilot then resumes control of the aircraft for weapon delivery.

"The outer surface of Nighthawk is coated with a Radar-Absorbent Material (RAM)."The aircraft is equipped with an Infrared Acquisition and Designation System (IRADS), which is integrated with the weapon delivery system. The pilot is presented with a view of the target on the head-up display, first from the FLIR and then from the DLIR.

The weapon delivery and impact is recorded on the aircraft's internally mounted video system, which provides real-time damage assessment.

ENGINES

The F-117A is powered by two low-bypass F404-GE-F1D2 turbofan engines from General Electric. The rectangular air intakes on both sides of the fuselage are covered by gratings, which are coated with radar-absorbent material.

The wide and flat structure of the engine exhaust area reduces the infrared and radar detectability of the aft section of the engine. The two large tail fins slant slightly outwards to provide an obstruction to the infrared and radar returns from the engine exhaust area.


Air Force Technology - F-117A Nighthawk - Stealth Fighter Attack Aircraft
__________________
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 15:38 PM   #50 (permalink)
Druze
Regular
 
Druze's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-23-07
Posts: 90
I work in Aerospace. The US arms industry lobbies the government very hard to get Israel these weapons. If Israel doesn't get the weapons it wants then it builds it themselves. Israel has the technological capability to build world class fighters, all it needs is financial partners. The US would much rather sell Israel an F-22 then watch Israel go into a partnership with India or China that builds an aircraft over the next 10-15 years that could rival it.

Also remember, the reason Israel is such an asset to the US over the past 33 years is that Israel conducts tests of these weapons that for the most part the US doesn't get an opportunity to do. The data gathered by Israel during their wars on Soviet weaponry proved priceless to American defense superiority, something that pales the couple billion of dollars Israel gets per year
Druze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 19:52 PM   #51 (permalink)
Catalan
Regular
 
Join Date: 11-20-05
Location: San Diego [USA] or El Provencio [Spain]
Posts: 121
Send a message via AIM to Catalan Send a message via MSN to Catalan
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistoricalDavid View Post
Do you have specific military examples?
Unfortunately, none that come to mind. The same argument was on other threads on other forums by people much more knowledgeable than me on the subject. Can you provide specific examples of United States technology that Israel had no right to sell, that was sold to China? Examples that can be proven - not the silly Patriot example.

What about the Lavi? Did Israel have the right to sell to China whatever they sold to China so that whatever Chinese fighter which looked like it could become what it became?



Quote:
What do you mean by that?
There is no more Cold War. Nations should be allowed to export to who they will because it is their right as sovereigns.
__________________
If you enjoy modern military history then join modernwarstudies.net!

http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i2...bees/siggy.png
Catalan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 20:32 PM   #52 (permalink)
Jimmy
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-16-05
Posts: 930
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
article
Maybe I'm missing it, but that doesnt say anywhere that the F-117 was designed to be a fighter.
Jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 21:36 PM   #53 (permalink)
joey
Senior Contributor
 
joey's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-25-06
Posts: 1,040
Quote:
EXCLUSIVE - U.S. arms-sale chief discounts F-22 sale to Japan

By Jim Wolf
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The top U.S. government arms-sale official on Friday all but dismissed prospects for supplying the United States' premier fighter jet to Japan or Israel, even if a sale is cleared by Congress.

Designing an export version of Lockheed Martin Corp.'s radar-evading F-22 Raptor could cost more than $1 billion and be "prohibitively expensive" for any would-be foreign buyer, said Air Force Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kohler, head of the Pentagon's Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

"If (export) were to be considered, which it's not, it essentially would have to be redesigned, rebuilt, retested and then go into production," Kohler, who oversees government-to-government arms sales, told Reuters in a brief interview.

The issue matters to Lockheed and its F-22 partners -- Boeing Co. and United Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney unit -- because overseas sales could extend the production line beyond 2011, when the last of the 183 Raptors currently planned is due to be sent to the U.S. Air Force.

Any redesign, Kohler said, would require degrading the aircraft's capabilities and making them tamper-proof to keep the technology exclusive -- a process he said would take years.

"This airplane was built to give us an edge way into the future, and that's why it's not exportable."

Japanese military officials are eyeing the F-22, the U.S. Air Force's primary air superiority fighter, as part of their response to growing regional missile threats, among other things.

The first F-22 overseas deployment was to Kadena Air Base on Okinawa, Japan, this year. Twelve are still in the region. The aircraft goes for $136 million per copy, not including development costs.

"BECOMING COMPELLING"

"I'm aware the Japanese are interested in the F-22," Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in an April 17 interview with Aviation Week & Space Technology magazine. "I'm also aware of our concerns about what we export and don't export in our high-end technology.

"We're committed to the defense of Japan, so we'll work our way through it," Pace said, according to an official transcript. "I think we all need to be concerned about both ballistic and cruise missile defense."

Loren Thompson, an analyst close to the Pentagon and to military contractors, discounted Kohler's comments as having been overtaken by senior Air Force officials' latest thinking.

"Strategic reasons for sharing the plane are becoming compelling," including cruise missile defense, said Thompson, of the Arlington, Virginia-based Lexington Institute, a research firm.

Another motivating factor, he said, is a belief that Japan may be willing to fund development of a new version that would be more of a bomber.

Israel is also widely reported to have shown interest in acquiring the F-22, which entered the U.S. combat fleet in December 2005, 20 years after it was conceived to battle Soviet MiG fighters over Europe.

As a prelude to exports, the U.S. Congress would have to lift a decade-old ban on overseas sales of the F-22, which features fuel-efficient supersonic speed and integrated electronic brains that could help defeat cruise missiles.

The ban was enacted to make sure the United States kept its technological edge. But the reported interest of Japan and Israel has fueled talk of reversing the law.

Dennis Wilder, senior director for East Asian Affairs on the White House National Security Council staff, told reporters this week that the Bush administration is "very positively disposed to talking to the Japanese about future-generation fighter aircraft.

"Whether it's going to be one model or another of aircraft is an open question at this point," he said on Wednesday, ahead of talks between President Bush and Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan which may have included the issue.

Kohler told Reuters the U.S. intent was to supply Lockheed Martin's next-generation F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, due to be available for export in about 2015.

Joseph Quimby, a spokesman for Lockheed's F-22 program, said, "Any discussions pertaining to foreign sales of the F-22 are the province of the U.S. government."




Copyright © 2007 Reuters
EXCLUSIVE - U.S. arms-sale chief discounts F-22 sale to Japan
Its high time Israel ties up with India to develope MCA, We badly a kickass radar Further developement of ELM 2052 (which possibly already on par with APG 81) with GaN modules!

India has a very high quality materials r&d.

Engines...Engines...Engines...Kaveri 2 can be used.

Rest is just good project management design etc.
__________________
www.techenclave.com
I'm very much gentleman :)

Opteron 146 EPAW (Venus SH-E4)||Asus A8N32 SLI Deluxe (Rev 1.02 & BIOS 1205)||Twinmos 1Gb Ram (2-3-3-5)||Geforce 6800Ultra (NV40C)||Creative X-FI Platinum||Seagate 7200.10 320GB SATA II (ST3300622AS)||Samsung 40Gb PATA (SP0411N)||Sony CDRW CRX230EE||SONY DVD-ROM DDU1621||Benq 1650||Antec NeoHE 500 Watts||Antec P180 (Custom Modded with Thermaltake Blue LED Smartfan and New Front Panel)||LG Flatron 775FT||Samsung Generic Keyboard||Copperhead
joey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2007, 02:13 AM   #54 (permalink)
Endangered
is a
Senior Contributor
 
Endangered's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-13-05
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 1,747
Israel may get F-22s if nation at risk

The United States would be inclined to allow the sale of advanced stealth F-22 fighter jets to the Israeli Air Force if the State of Israel's security was in jeopardy, former US Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen told The Jerusalem Post Thursday night.

On a 24-hour visit to Israel, Cohen, who served as defense chief under President Bill Clinton from 1996 until 2000, met on Thursday with Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Defense Minister Amir Peretz and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni for talks on the looming Iranian nuclear threat and other regional issues.

Cohen currently heads the Cohen Group, which provides business consulting services and advice on tactical and strategic opportunities around the globe.

The Post reported last week that the Air Force has expressed newfound interest in receiving the F-22 - a US-developed fifth generation stealth fighter jet - and has requested that the Defense Ministry present the request on its behalf to the Pentagon. Defense officials have asked to receive the jet so Israel can retain its military edge in the region in face of American plans to sell smart bombs to Saudi Arabia.

"There is no stronger relationship than with Israel," Cohen said. "There could be circumstances that that level of technology would be released to Israelis."

While Congress and the Pentagon would be hesitant to release classified technology like the F-22 to Israel, "if it came to a question of Israeli security, I am confident they will come to help."

The F-22 has been forbidden for export by the Pentagon.

Cohen arrived in Israel Wednesday night after visiting a number of Gulf states, including Abu Dhabi and Dubai, as well as Jordan. Cohen said that during his talks with leaders in those counties he heard "sentiments" acknowledging that Iran was the greatest threat to stability in the Middle East and no longer Israel. Cohen visited Israel as secretary of defense in 2000.

"They understand that Iran is a threat to them all," he said. "There is a convergence of interest evolving and you can find that Israel is not being seen as the adversary."

With Iran funding Hamas in the Gaza Strip, Hizbullah in Lebanon and Syria, there was a need to focus on the "center" when looking to find the catalyst for instability in the Middle East, Cohen said.

"The prospect of Iran getting nuclear weapons changes the dynamics in the region with great impact for rest of world," he said. "We try to seek ways that the Gulf states can cooperate with the US. They are not yet ready to announce diplomatic relations with Israel but the sentiment is shifting and they understand that Iran is the major threat to them and not Israel."

URI
__________________
Wild Wild Web
Endangered is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2007, 08:57 AM   #55 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,329
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
Maybe I'm missing it, but that doesnt say anywhere that the F-117 was designed to be a fighter.
The name alone (F117 Stealth Fighter) suggests it is designed along the fighter line instead of the bomber. Compare the F117 with the B1 and the B2. Those are fundamentally designed bombers where as the shape,size and agility of the F117 suggest a fighter origin. Although we use it as a bomber and it may not be capable as a dogfighter as it is not its intended purpose.

This from the designers of the project.

F-117 Nighthawk

DESCRIPTION:


F-117A Stealth Fighter - Revolutionary Support for a Revolutionary Fighter

The F-117, developed in total secrecy, was the first operational platform to employ what is known today as "stealth." Its startling, unconventional shape clearly signified the arrival of a new era in fighter performance through low-observable technology.

Since then, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company has introduced another revolutionary aspect to the fighter. Through total system performance responsibility (TSPR) for F-117 sustainment, this unprecedented contract provides technical, maintenance and modernization support to the 49th Fighter Wing and its F-117 fleet. This comprehensive support program provides such enhancements as lean manufacturing and repair processes, significantly faster spare parts fulfillment, reduced engineering response times, and technical publications.

If Lockheeds designers called it a fighter then I think its pretty safe to say it's origins come from the fighter line.

You will also notice they operate fom the 49th Fighter Wing instead of the 49th bomber wing.

F-117 Nighthawk

B2
Stationed to 509th Bomber wing Whitman AirForce base.
B-2 Spirit

B1
The B1's operate from multiple Bomber wings

Last edited by Dreadnought : 04-30-2007 at 12:21 PM.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2007, 16:01 PM   #56 (permalink)
Maxor
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-18-05
Posts: 325
The F-117 was called a fighter simply due to the fact that funding for a "bomber" with the payload that can be carried by one would never materialize. Fighters implies that this aircraft was designed with air to air capability in mind and it wasn't in this case. It would have made more sense to designate it A for attack aircraft but since this was misdirection for funding I guess. It also has/had the benieifet of getting fighter community pilots over. For some reason it also appears to use the old pre 1962 designation system yet the aircraft wsn't in existance at that time.... (though maybe early development had started, wierd black developed planes)

Last edited by Maxor : 04-30-2007 at 16:06 PM.
Maxor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2007, 18:41 PM   #57 (permalink)
Tasman
Regular
 
Tasman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-24-07
Location: Hobart, Tasmania
Posts: 78
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxor View Post
The F-117 was called a fighter simply due to the fact that funding for a "bomber" with the payload that can be carried by one would never materialize. Fighters implies that this aircraft was designed with air to air capability in mind and it wasn't in this case. It would have made more sense to designate it A for attack aircraft but since this was misdirection for funding I guess. It also has/had the benieifet of getting fighter community pilots over. For some reason it also appears to use the old pre 1962 designation system yet the aircraft wsn't in existance at that time.... (though maybe early development had started, wierd black developed planes)
Good explanation Maxor.

The 'A' designation would have been more appropriate but as you've said the 'F' was probably used for reasons of deception. Fair enought - it was a 'black' program. The 'A' designation would also have been more appropriate for the F-111 which was used exclusively in the attack/strike/bomber role by both the USAF and the RAAF (apart from the EF111A and RF111C versions).

Cheers
__________________
Learn from the past. Prepare for the future.
Tasman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2007, 19:17 PM   #58 (permalink)
Jimmy
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-16-05
Posts: 930
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasman View Post
Good explanation Maxor.

The 'A' designation would have been more appropriate but as you've said the 'F' was probably used for reasons of deception. Fair enought - it was a 'black' program. The 'A' designation would also have been more appropriate for the F-111 which was used exclusively in the attack/strike/bomber role by both the USAF and the RAAF (apart from the EF111A and RF111C versions).

Cheers
The F-117 was one of the shining examples of a black program. I've always heard that the "F" designator was for one (or both) of two purposes: funding, and deception in case any words did leak out.

I dont see how the F-117 could've possibly been intended to be a fighter...its too slow, its not maneuverable enough in the "envelope" you'd want to be maneuverable in if you were flying a fighter, and there's no room for a proper air-to-air radar except behind the pilot...NOT the place you want to shoot trons from.
Jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2007, 11:18 AM   #59 (permalink)
BenRoethig
Senior Contributor
 
BenRoethig's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-03-04
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 1,047
Country:
The nighthawk uses the old Air Force designation system. It designated strategic aircraft as bombers and tactical aircraft as fighters, it didn't matter if their role was to drop bombs or shoot down enemy aircraft. There was an attack designation, but it was used to designate aircraft used for close air support missions. The Navy system, on the other hand did denote the actual role of the aircraft. When the tri-service system came about they combined the best elements of both systems.
__________________
F/A-18E/F Super Hornet: The Honda Accord of fighters.
BenRoethig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2007, 13:11 PM   #60 (permalink)
Maxor
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-18-05
Posts: 325
You'll notice I pointed out in my post that it appears to use the old designation..... I just can't figure out why since I know it wasn't in service when the switch took place. (though it may have been in early development however planes that entered service earlier used the new designators f-4)

Last edited by Maxor : 05-02-2007 at 13:16 PM.
Maxor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should members of the Church of God go to war? Ray World Affairs Board Pub 22 06-19-2008 09:53 AM
Outline Of What will if Israel attacks Iran? Commando The Iranian Question 20 07-30-2007 19:00 PM
Israel Must Be Held Accountable For Its International Law Violations SolveEtCoagula World Affairs Board Pub 59 08-12-2006 15:58 PM
Guerilla Warfare troung The Staff College 13 04-05-2006 02:25 AM
Hitler's Fourth Reich is the European Union; you make your pick… human The Western Alliance 34 11-14-2004 02:41 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:48 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8