View Poll Results: Best Attack Helecopter

Voters
217. You may not vote on this poll
  • AH64D Apache Longbow

    117 53.92%
  • A129 Augusta Mangusta

    9 4.15%
  • Mi 28 Havoc

    19 8.76%
  • Kamov Ka52 Blackshark varients

    46 21.20%
  • Eurocopter Tigre

    17 7.83%
  • Rooivalk AH-2As

    9 4.15%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 9 of 14 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 LastLast
Results 121 to 135 of 203

Thread: Attack Helicopters

  1. #121
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    19 Jun 07
    Posts
    320
    Country: Turkey
    Hi J`ve

    we all know it is a project at the moment, it has already been discussed. Go back 4 posts to see where we are at.

  2. #122
    Regular
    Join Date
    11 Mar 06
    Posts
    76
    I see, Sir

    I'll back to this post 4 or 5 years later

  3. #123
    Banned
    Join Date
    16 Nov 07
    Location
    New South Wales
    Posts
    205
    Country: Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by Ucar View Post
    Two weeks have passed and we have not see a Turkish medium/long range SAM system being tested. Do you have any updates or information for us ?
    Sn. Ucar lets wait for the upcoming SSIK meeting...I think that, that meeting will settle all our speculation for once and for all :-) I am sure that you are aware how not all projects were "discussed" in the current meeting and that several projects were left for further evaluation. I believe there will also be a great leap forward in a Turkish made heavy-lift helicopter. They will opt for a partnership with Sikorsky and Agusta in my opinion...but it remains to be seen...

  4. #124
    Banned
    Join Date
    13 Jun 07
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    2,297
    Country: Russian Federation
    That's just a list of companies. Where's the test? The data on the new system?

  5. #125
    Banned
    Join Date
    19 Oct 05
    Posts
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by Glosters UK View Post
    Ok what do you guys think is the best all round attack helecopter? I think its close between the KA50 series and the Longbow?

    A129 Augusta Mangusta
    ka 52 black shark varients
    Mi 24 Hind
    Mi 28 Havoc
    AH64D Apache Longbow
    Rooivalk AH-2As
    Tigre Eurocopter varients
    Well, I don't want to write about Turkish army or Russians loss in Afghanistan or even personal info of other members. I think it is not relevant when you answer on very straight question.
    So, back to topic - I open wikipedia to find some info.
    Here it is:
    AH64D Apache-- A129-- Mi 28-- Ka52--
    Country= USA -- Italia -- Russia-- Russia--
    Crew= 2 -- 2 -- 2 -- 2--
    Length=17.73 m -- 12.28 m -- 17 m-- 13.5 m--
    Rotor diameter=14.63 m-- 11.9 m-- 17.20 m-- 2x 14.5 m--
    Height=3.87 m -- 3.35 m -- 3.82 m-- 5.4 m--
    Disc area=168.11m2-- 445 m2 -- 232.4 m2-- 330.3 m2--
    Empty weight=5165 kg-- 2530 kg-- 7895 kg -- 7800 kg--
    Max weight=9500 kg-- 4600 kg-- 12100 kg-- 12880 kg--
    Powerplant=2 x 1490 kW--2 x 664 kW-- 2 x 1640 kW-- 2 x 1760 kW--
    Max speed=293 km/h-- 278 km/h-- 305 km/h-- 390 km/h--
    Cruise speed=265 km/h-- 229 km/h-- n/a-- 270 km/h--
    Combat radius=480 km-- 510 km-- 520 km-- 520 km--
    Ferry range=1200 km-- 1000 km-- 1140 km-- 1200 km--
    Ceiling = 6400 m-- 4725 m-- 5800 m-- 5500 m--
    Rate of climb=12.7 m/s-- 10.2 m/s-- 13.7 m/s-- 10 m/s--
    Disc loading=47.9 kg/m2--n/a-- 45 kg/m2-- 30 kg/m2--
    Power/Mass=310 W/kg-- n/a-- 310 W/kg-- 330 W/kg--

    sorry, I dont know how attach excel file
    Last edited by antileader; 16 Dec 07, at 08:15.

  6. #126
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    19 Jun 07
    Posts
    320
    Country: Turkey
    Quote Originally Posted by antileader View Post
    Well, I don't want to write about Turkish army or Russians loss in Afghanistan or even personal info of other members. I think it is not relevant when you answer on very straight question.
    So, back to topic - I open wikipedia to find some info.
    Here it is:
    AH64D Apache-- A129-- Mi 28-- Ka52--
    Country= USA -- Italia -- Russia-- Russia--
    Crew= 2 -- 2 -- 2 -- 2--
    Length=17.73 m -- 12.28 m -- 17 m-- 13.5 m--
    Rotor diameter=14.63 m-- 11.9 m-- 17.20 m-- 2x 14.5 m--
    Height=3.87 m -- 3.35 m -- 3.82 m-- 5.4 m--
    Disc area=168.11m2-- 445 m2 -- 232.4 m2-- 330.3 m2--
    Empty weight=5165 kg-- 2530 kg-- 7895 kg -- 7800 kg--
    Max weight=9500 kg-- 4600 kg-- 12100 kg-- 12880 kg--
    Powerplant=2 x 1490 kW--2 x 664 kW-- 2 x 1640 kW-- 2 x 1760 kW--
    Max speed=293 km/h-- 278 km/h-- 305 km/h-- 390 km/h--
    Cruise speed=265 km/h-- 229 km/h-- n/a-- 270 km/h--
    Combat radius=480 km-- 510 km-- 520 km-- 520 km--
    Ferry range=1200 km-- 1000 km-- 1140 km-- 1200 km--
    Ceiling = 6400 m-- 4725 m-- 5800 m-- 5500 m--
    Rate of climb=12.7 m/s-- 10.2 m/s-- 13.7 m/s-- 10 m/s--
    Disc loading=47.9 kg/m2--n/a-- 45 kg/m2-- 30 kg/m2--
    Power/Mass=310 W/kg-- n/a-- 310 W/kg-- 330 W/kg--

    sorry, I dont know how attach excel file

    I think there is a problem with the disc area values.

    The formula for the calculation of the area of a circle is : Pi x Radius x Radius

    Therefore, given that the above rotor diametere are correct, the disc areas should be (Pi rounded to 3,14):

    Apache : 7.315x7.315x3.14 : 168.02 m2
    A129 : 5.95x5.95x3.14 : 111.16 m2
    Mi28 : 8.6x8.6x3.14 : 232.23 m2
    Ka52 : (7.25x7.25x3.14)x2 : 330.10 m2

    The disc area for the A129 is wrong in the above table.

  7. #127
    Banned
    Join Date
    19 Oct 05
    Posts
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by Ucar View Post
    I think there is a problem with the disc area values.

    The formula for the calculation of the area of a circle is : Pi x Radius x Radius

    Therefore, given that the above rotor diametere are correct, the disc areas should be (Pi rounded to 3,14):

    Apache : 7.315x7.315x3.14 : 168.02 m2
    A129 : 5.95x5.95x3.14 : 111.16 m2
    Mi28 : 8.6x8.6x3.14 : 232.23 m2
    Ka52 : (7.25x7.25x3.14)x2 : 330.10 m2

    The disc area for the A129 is wrong in the above table.
    Well,
    I agreed - your numbers are right.
    Difference just for Italian A129, but I took info here

  8. #128
    S65
    S65 is offline
    Regular
    Join Date
    23 Dec 07
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Posts
    55
    Country: United States
    Yes Glosters, I saw that. It's neat that downed aircrew can use their D rings (I think) on their vests to lock themselves into the ladder of the Apache and sit on the chin or stubs and ride out. I'd bet it'd be a great change of perspective!

  9. #129
    Banned
    Join Date
    19 Mar 08
    Posts
    7
    The AH-64D is currently the best, and if they hadn't canceled the prodution of the RAH-66 it would be the best.

  10. #130
    BD1
    BD1 is offline
    Señor Contributor Senior Contributor BD1's Avatar
    Join Date
    30 Nov 06
    Location
    estonia
    Posts
    2,712
    Country: Estonia
    This thread is cursed . Almost every poster here has been banished .
    If i only was so smart yesterday as my wife is today

  11. #131
    New Member Boertjie's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Mar 07
    Location
    South Africa - Suid Afrika
    Posts
    8
    Country: Zuid Afrika
    What are the criteria for determining the best attack helicopter?
    It seems to me that it has nothing to do with specifications or operability but more with how many were sold or built than anything ells.
    If this is true, then the AH-64 Apache wins hands down and we all can go and cry in a corner somewhere.
    But if specification and operability and so forth are the criteria then it might be a different story. I suggest a matrics should be drawn-up with all the critical specs on the left and the contenders on top. Then you gather the most reliable (???) info you can lay your hands on and write it down in the centre of your matrics. Now compare...
    It is quite obvious then that the Apache no longer has the upper hand. In fact, no single helicopter has the upper hand. But be warned, you'll be surprised at what comes out of the exercise.
    Check the Rooivalk and Kamov KA-28. Apache falls short on most (not all) counts. Even the cobra (latest version) seems to be a better buy.
    There are some other issues which can not be seen in a matrics. Things like support required, down time, price, weapons ability and flight aids to ease pilot work load. These things are not easy to answer and these are things you simply do not find in the public domain.
    So, I come to the conclusion that the question can not really be answered by us. I'm in the military industry. I'm an electronic engineer with 13y's in the weapons industry. I've worked on missiles and helicopters for most of my life and I'm sure that if the US, Frans, Britain and Russia were not using politics and other heavy handed tactics, the issue of sales for some other manufacturers would have been much different.
    That's my bit into the pot. Like we say in my language: "put it in your pipe and smoke it" (translated)
    God bo alles, my gesin daarna en my volk kort op hulle hakke, dan eers, ek!!!

  12. #132
    Regular Sinister's Avatar
    Join Date
    13 Mar 08
    Posts
    134
    In terms of attack helicopter I belive AH-64D is the best as the task it is given since it can find cover and jump up fire its fire and forget destroy the SAM and then is free too destroy all the armor on ground as in Ka-50 or Mi-28 are vulnerable too SAM , though in terms of armor and maneuverability the Ka-50 is somewhat better than the Longbow as the Mi-28 I heard has amazing armor including its windshield and the amarment is quite impressive though not fire and forget.

  13. #133
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    15 Sep 06
    Posts
    6,755
    The Rooivalk is known to be a first-rate anti-tank helicopter and in the right war setting would be extremely effective. My one reservation concerns its size, as it was developed from the Puma.
    Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.

  14. #134
    Contributor LetsTalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    16 Mar 08
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    718
    Country: United States
    I voted for the Apache, which I give a slight edge over the Mi 28 & KA52. But it was a hard decision, partially because AH-64 did have problems in Kosovo in 1999, 2 AH-64s crashed.


    AH-64 in Kosovo (1999)
    Apaches Are Ailing Warriors

    AH-64 Apache - Military Aircraft

  15. #135
    Global Moderator
    Military Professional
    Defense Professional
    Albany Rifles's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Apr 07
    Location
    Prince George, VA
    Posts
    4,095
    Country: United States
    AGM-114 HELLFIRE - Jane's Air Forces News

    Don't know if it was said but the standard Hellfires in teh US inventory have a range of 9 kilometers. Someone had said it had too short of a range.
    Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is to know to not use it in a fruit salad.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. How China Loses The Coming Space War
    By HKDan in forum East Asia and the Pacific
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 02 Oct 09,, 07:23
  2. Liberals Blame America for Nick Berg's Death
    By Leader in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 20 Aug 07,, 10:30
  3. 2003 Navy Global Conops
    By Defcon 6 in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07 Jul 06,, 04:26
  4. Golden age for mercenaries
    By Great Lencucha in forum Ancient, Medieval & Early Modern Ages
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03 Mar 06,, 02:57
  5. A Preemptive Attack on Iran's Nuclear Facilities: Possible Consequences
    By lulldapull in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 20 Nov 04,, 21:27

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts