Defense, Miitary, and Geopolitical Forum
                                                     The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | WAB Bookstore


LOGIN or REGISTER to REMOVE ADS

Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Discussion > Military Aviation



View Poll Results: Best Attack Helecopter
AH64D Apache Longbow 117 53.92%
A129 Augusta Mangusta 9 4.15%
Mi 28 Havoc 19 8.76%
Kamov Ka52 Blackshark varients 46 21.20%
Eurocopter Tigre 17 7.83%
Rooivalk AH-2As 9 4.15%
Voters: 217. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-23-2007, 20:49 PM   #91 (permalink)
Banished
 
Join Date: 11-16-07
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 205
Country:
According to TAI sources the Turks will be spending another $1.1 billion on improvements alone. That to me equates with designing a very capable heli!

Furthermore, SSM officials have stated that after the first 20 deliveries to the Turkish Army, the fuselage will undergo "significant redeveloped" to be "more stealth capable". Considering the current developments in Turkish stealth technology we can expect something radically new.

You might also be interested to know that TAI intends to use this platform to develop an unmanned attack heli (Turna Project 2) in the future. This information can be found at Savunma Sanayii Müsteşarlığı - Ana Sayfa and TAI - Tusaş-Türk HAVACILIK VE UZAY SANAYİİ A.Ş. - TURKISH AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES INC. .

I would also recommend that you compare the performance indicators for all available attack helis in the world market. You will see that the A129 only lacks in the Radar and Weapons systems sections. The rest is either equivalent or better when compared to its competitors. Since, TAI is re-engineering the Radar system and the weapons systems...the T-129 will certainly not be subordinate to its competitors!

Above all when you join the forces of TAI/ASELSAN/IAI/and ELTA, believe me you will develop one of the best (if not the best in the world) Radar. Just "google" T129 and IAI/ELTA there is a lot of information on the venture. Add a 3rd gen ASEL-Flir 300 and you have one deadly machine!

Also, the Turks know their technology very well...they have never and will never settle for second best...especially when we are talking about aerial platforms! How many countries maintain in excess of 500 combat aircraft? Only a few handfull!

Last edited by Khan_Han; 11-24-2007 at 06:47 AM..
Khan_Han is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 22:18 PM   #92 (permalink)
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-16-05
Posts: 1,457
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by KHAN_HAN View Post
According to TAI sources the Turks will be spending another $1.1 billion on improvements alone. That to me equates with designing a very capable heli!
Money = capability?
Jimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 06:44 AM   #93 (permalink)
Banished
 
Join Date: 11-16-07
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 205
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
Money = capability?
Most definitely; if you have the financial resources PLUS you’re a NATO member, it is not very hard to get the technology! $1.1 billion means that the R&D team will have a lot at their disposal…
The US and Partner nations spent in excess of $100 billion on the F-22 and JSF. Pakistan/China spent $500 million on the J-19. Can you even compare both platform technologies? I don’t think so!

Money talks!
Khan_Han is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 17:30 PM   #94 (permalink)
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 09-08-05
Posts: 272
Quote:
Originally Posted by KHAN_HAN View Post
Most definitely; if you have the financial resources PLUS you’re a NATO member, it is not very hard to get the technology! $1.1 billion means that the R&D team will have a lot at their disposal…
The US and Partner nations spent in excess of $100 billion on the F-22 and JSF. Pakistan/China spent $500 million on the J-19. Can you even compare both platform technologies? I don’t think so!

Money talks!
Absolute RUBISH...!!!
Money helps you acheive an aim...... without experience and know how, you have b'ollocks..!
Now please dont tell me that turkish 'know how' can be compared to the likes of BAE Systems, Lockheed, Sukoi, and so forth.!
When have the Turks had the capability to be a capable arms producer on their own accord without oudside help...???
They are not an 'inventor' of new, only a handfull of countries can be credited with that. Turkey is not one of them.
It has the means to sustain some of its Military through deals acheived with other countries such as some of its planes, which is liscensced to you to use.
can you build your own MBT.....NO
can you build your own Fighter Jet.... NO
can you build your own Nucleur Submarine.... NO
can you build your own SAM system....NO
Can you build your own Destroyer/Frigate... NO
So what can you build on your own accord, please enlighten me Here.?
Cause to me, I havent seen many main-stream Military equipment with a 'Made In Turkey' labal, other then what you are liscenced to produce.
Simullacrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 19:30 PM   #95 (permalink)
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
 
omon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Location: bk
Posts: 2,652
Country:
^^^ but they do make the best leather in the world, soft as silk,

sorry, couldn,t resist
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" B. Franklin

Last edited by omon; 11-24-2007 at 20:16 PM..
omon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 07:06 AM   #96 (permalink)
Banished
 
Join Date: 11-16-07
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 205
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simullacrum View Post
Absolute RUBISH...!!!
Money helps you acheive an aim...... without experience and know how, you have b'ollocks..!
Now please dont tell me that turkish 'know how' can be compared to the likes of BAE Systems, Lockheed, Sukoi, and so forth.!
When have the Turks had the capability to be a capable arms producer on their own accord without oudside help...???
They are not an 'inventor' of new, only a handfull of countries can be credited with that. Turkey is not one of them.
It has the means to sustain some of its Military through deals acheived with other countries such as some of its planes, which is liscensced to you to use.
can you build your own MBT.....NO
can you build your own Fighter Jet.... NO
can you build your own Nucleur Submarine.... NO
can you build your own SAM system....NO
Can you build your own Destroyer/Frigate... NO
So what can you build on your own accord, please enlighten me Here.?
Cause to me, I havent seen many main-stream Military equipment with a 'Made In Turkey' labal, other then what you are liscenced to produce.
Firstly, can you please show me which country or countries produce 100% National Projects. For gods sake some of the USN ships such as the Oliver Hazard Perry class frigates use Italian made Oto Melara 76 mm guns!

can you build your own MBT.....YES, SEE MILLI-TANK PROJECT
can you build your own Fighter Jet.... YES, if we had the finances. TAI, ASELSAN, TUSAS inter alia all produce critical aircraft components including but not limited to Navigation and Targeting Pods, Electronic protection suites, Avionics etc. TAI also produces it own Turbo prop engine and R&D is continuing on a Turbo fan engine. If Turkey wanted all these could be joined under the roof of a national fighter program. Also, note that all Turkish F-16 undergoing CCIP modernization will utilise Turkish designed and produced Avionics, Electronic Protection Suites and Targeting pods. In addition to this Turkey is developing a National UCAV called the TIHA.
can you build your own Nucleur Submarine....Do we need them?
can you build your own SAM system....YES, 6 Turkish companies have bidded on current Turkish SAM tenders. ROKETSAN is one of the major companies, well know for this kind of technology. Please see, ANNOUNCEMENT RELATED TO THE COMPANIES WHO HAVE PROVIDED RESPONSE TO THE TURKISH MEDIUM ALTITUDE AIR DEFENCE MISSILE SYSTEM (T-MALADMIS) REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) (September 6th, 2007)
Can you build your own Destroyer/Frigate... YES, look at the MILGEM project and TF-2000 project!

Also, I would like to inform you that Turkish Companies such as ASELSAN and TAI export indegenous technology to the US, France and UK. Please refer to this Israeli document, which cites Turkish Technology exports: http://www.tau.ac.il/jcss/balance/Turkey.pdf
TEI has developed and exported to NASA 107, J85 Engine Ejectors. Infact this Turkish invention won the “Export Incentive Award for 2002” and General Electric Aircraft Engine’s “2002 Brian H. Rowe Engineering Award”.

Furthermore, Turkey has also develeped its own anti-anti missiles similar to the Hellfire II called the UMTAS: Roketsan’ın UMTAS ve Cirit’i « savunma ve uluslararası iliÅŸkiler
It has also developed a 78mm semi-active laser guided rocket: 2.75 inch Laser Guided Rocket / Roketsan - Military Pictures - Air Force Army Navy Missiles

Turkey currently also designs and manufactures its own Armoured Personel Carriers such as the Panter and Akrep:
Turkey also produces its own Howitzers called Panter.

For a detailed run down on what Turkey produces I draw your attention to the following Turkish Government website in English: Savunma Sanayii Müsteşarlığı - Main Page

Above all, had Turkey not been a developer of technology, it would not have been invited to join the Airbus Military A400 project. Furthermore, if Turkey could not produce technology Airbus would also not want TAI's Designining and R&D services for the Airbus project. See Dubai 2007: TAI bids to extend Airbus and F-16 contracts-11/11/2007-Flight Daily News!

TURKEY ONLY LACKS THE ABILITY TO MARKET ITS PRODUCTS DUE TO POOR IMAGE!!! BUT WAIT ANOTHER 5 YEARS AND YOU SHALL DEFINATELY SEE TURKISH PRODUCTS WORLDWIDE.
Khan_Han is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 09:37 AM   #97 (permalink)
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 09-08-05
Posts: 272
Firstly, can you please show me which country or countries produce 100% National Projects. For gods sake some of the USN ships such as the Oliver Hazard Perry class frigates use Italian made Oto Melara 76 mm guns!
---------------------
Indeed...but still design and concept are designed inhouse, unless you going to tendor.
The smaller countries with less buying power and capability tend to go out to tendor straight away and buy whats on the market, or come up with a requirement, and put that requirement out to tendor.
Type 45, Astsute submarines, HMS invincible, Harrier Jumpjets were designed in house by the nations defence groups.
So be it you will find a few sub systems from the outside, that can be due to politics, money, or just plain simple, that the subsystem is alot more capable then what we got. why re-invent the wheel.
Only time that will happene is when something new and radical is needed, or a host country wants to keep it to itself, and not rely on a 3rd party for technology, maintanence and parts, all be it at the expesnce of cost.!
----------------------

can you build your own MBT.....YES, SEE MILLI-TANK PROJECT
-----------
Thats just a project that has recentely started nothing tangable there.
When and if it become tangable, I very much Doubt it will compete with the greats such M1, Challengers, and Leopards.

-----------
can you build your own Fighter Jet.... YES, if we had the finances. TAI, ASELSAN, TUSAS inter alia all produce critical aircraft components including but not limited to Navigation and Targeting Pods, Electronic protection suites, Avionics etc. TAI also produces it own Turbo prop engine and R&D is continuing on a Turbo fan engine. If Turkey wanted all these could be joined under the roof of a national fighter program. Also, note that all Turkish F-16 undergoing CCIP modernization will utilise Turkish designed and produced Avionics, Electronic Protection Suites and Targeting pods. In addition to this Turkey is developing a National UCAV called the TIHA.
-------------------
Because you produce some parts for a jet fighter, it does not give you the right/know how to produce a fighter jet, anyhow, here you are not inventing something new, but mearly following a concept that has been done by manier countries before you.
--------------------


can you build your own Nucleur Submarine....Do we need them?
-------------------
Why not.??? they give an unprescendent capability to a nation's militry power.
You seem to claim that Turkey is this 'great military power house' why not have them. Numbers does not make any refrence to how good a military power is, expereince and fighting is where the evidence lies to how a military can be seen in the world.

-------------------
can you build your own SAM system....YES, 6 Turkish companies have bidded on current Turkish SAM tenders. ROKETSAN is one of the major companies, well know for this kind of technology. Please see, ANNOUNCEMENT RELATED TO THE COMPANIES WHO HAVE PROVIDED RESPONSE TO THE TURKISH MEDIUM ALTITUDE AIR DEFENCE MISSILE SYSTEM (T-MALADMIS) REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) (September 6th, 2007)

-------------------
Again a current bid, nothing tangable. Will it be able to compete with the likes of the s300 and patriot systems...again very much doubt.
------------------------

Can you build your own Destroyer/Frigate... YES, look at the MILGEM project and TF-2000 project!
-----------------
ok, this one i will give it to you, as this is more tangable...i.e. should be out on sea trial soon, if not already. and within the turkish forces in 2010.
-----------------


TURKEY ONLY LACKS THE ABILITY TO MARKET ITS PRODUCTS DUE TO POOR IMAGE!!! BUT WAIT ANOTHER 5 YEARS AND YOU SHALL DEFINATELY SEE TURKISH PRODUCTS WORLDWIDE.

-----------------------
It will take Turkey more then 5 years for it to be comparable with the likes of BAE systems, Lockheed, Suhkoi, and so forth, if it will ever be able to acheive that status...!!!
We are talking about Companies that have been at the forfront of inovation for Decades they are THE inventors not the followers.

-----------------------

Last edited by Simullacrum; 11-25-2007 at 09:39 AM..
Simullacrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 14:16 PM   #98 (permalink)
Banished
 
Join Date: 10-27-07
Posts: 74
the havoc remains the best

simply for being rugged. it can operate in any terrain & adverse weather conditions .
wajahat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 15:07 PM   #99 (permalink)
Regular
 
Levsha's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-07
Posts: 69
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by wajahat View Post
the havoc remains the best

simply for being rugged. it can operate in any terrain & adverse weather conditions .
Who told you it's rugged??

Can it operate in any terrain and 'adverse weather condition'?

Last edited by Levsha; 11-25-2007 at 16:39 PM..
Levsha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 15:49 PM   #100 (permalink)
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Posts: 6,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levsha View Post
Who told you it's rugged??

Can it operate in any terrain and 'adverse weather condition?
He's only a kid who has been impressed with photographs. He has no experience with any kind of aircraft.
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.
glyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 16:30 PM   #101 (permalink)
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,386
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by wajahat View Post
the havoc remains the best

simply for being rugged. it can operate in any terrain & adverse weather conditions .
I like the Black Shark more. Even if it is more of a dedicated tank hunter.
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 17:18 PM   #102 (permalink)
Regular
 
Levsha's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-04-07
Posts: 69
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by glyn View Post
He's only a kid who has been impressed with photographs. He has no experience with any kind of aircraft.
Well I only decided to stick my oar in on that point he made, because one hears quite often how ‘rugged’ and ‘easy to maintain’ various Soviet and Russian aircraft are in operational use and I often wonder just how much these attributes can be proven. Also, if they are so rugged and what not, to what extent other areas of the aircraft’s performance and operational capabilities have been compromised – if you build an aircraft like a tank, it will fly like a tank...

The Mi-28 is the case in point. I’m sure it could be a good aircraft after many years of operational flying and accumulated flying hours, but bearing in mind that the US army had to go through many growing pains with the AH-64 when they first brought it into service, just to bring it up to high level of serviceability, it seems to me quite naive to make bold claims about a comparable aircraft (Mi-28) of which only a grand total of only six or ten aircraft have entered service. All this despite the fact the Mi-28 project first started almost 30 years ago.

Last edited by Levsha; 11-25-2007 at 18:01 PM..
Levsha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 20:46 PM   #103 (permalink)
Banished
 
Join Date: 11-16-07
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 205
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simullacrum View Post
Firstly, can you please show me which country or countries produce 100% National Projects. For gods sake some of the USN ships such as the Oliver Hazard Perry class frigates use Italian made Oto Melara 76 mm guns!
---------------------
Indeed...but still design and concept are designed inhouse, unless you going to tendor. Well the Turks also have several internal design teams. Savunma Sanayii Müsteşarlığı brings all these under one roof!The smaller countries with less buying power and capability tend to go out to tendor straight away and buy whats on the market, or come up with a requirement, and put that requirement out to tendor. You answer the question yourself: small countries lack the financial resources to do it by themselves. However, as the Turkish Finance Minister said "Turkish GDP will exceed $1.2 trillion in 5 years times". Hence, alot of things will change. Turkish scientists in institutions such as NASA etc have already started coming back to Turkey. They are being given even higher salaries than what they earned in the US and Europe!Type 45, Astsute submarines, HMS invincible, Harrier Jumpjets were designed in house by the nations defence groups.
So be it you will find a few sub systems from the outside, that can be due to politics, money, or just plain simple, that the subsystem is alot more capable then what we got. why re-invent the wheel. Same applies for the Turks! Why invent the F-16 when we get it cheaper from the US! Its better to work on projects such as the Turkish TIHA UCAV and the unmanned Land patrol vehicles such as an unmanned armed Jet Ski being developed by ASELSAN!
Only time that will happene is when something new and radical is needed, or a host country wants to keep it to itself, and not rely on a 3rd party for technology, maintanence and parts, all be it at the expesnce of cost.!
----------------------

can you build your own MBT.....YES, SEE MILLI-TANK PROJECT
-----------
Thats just a project that has recentely started nothing tangable there.
When and if it become tangable, I very much Doubt it will compete with the greats such M1, Challengers, and Leopards.
Can you please tell me when the M1, Challengers, and Leopards were designed and built? In order for their to be a project and prototype there needs to be a design! Well that design and prototype has already been completed but the Turkish Armed Forces!! Hence, to me thats tangible enough! All they have to do is commence mass production once testing is complete! The Turkish National Tank project will be a new class of MBT! It is being designed in the 21st century with Nano-technology at hand and a whole load of other technologies which wasn't available when the M1, Challengers, and Leopards were designed and built! Also, the Milli-Tank project is not the first tank project Turkey has ventured into. The Turks have a joint-venture with the Israeli's and currently produce the M60T! (Albeit, this is a modernization project, both sources state that the M60T is a "totally new tank"!!). In addition to these Turkish companies such as Otokar already have developed their own MBT's but no orders have come from the Turkish Armed Forces!-----------
can you build your own Fighter Jet.... YES, if we had the finances. TAI, ASELSAN, TUSAS inter alia all produce critical aircraft components including but not limited to Navigation and Targeting Pods, Electronic protection suites, Avionics etc. TAI also produces it own Turbo prop engine and R&D is continuing on a Turbo fan engine. If Turkey wanted all these could be joined under the roof of a national fighter program. Also, note that all Turkish F-16 undergoing CCIP modernization will utilise Turkish designed and produced Avionics, Electronic Protection Suites and Targeting pods. In addition to this Turkey is developing a National UCAV called the TIHA.
-------------------
Because you produce some parts for a jet fighter, it does not give you the right/know how to produce a fighter jet, anyhow, here you are not inventing something new, but mearly following a concept that has been done by manier countries before you. I wouldn't classify Avionics, Electronic Protection Suites, Targeting pods and Engines merely as "some parts". How many countries can produce these? A very small number! And also whats left of the plane? The fuselage and landing gear? Well, we already build a great number of fuselages for Airbus, Boeing, Lockheed Martin and a whole load of other US and European Companies! For dead cheap too! We have one of the most developed composites technology in the world. I draw your attention to the YONCA-ONUK MRTP 33 Hull. This technology is so developed that the US Coast Guard is in negotiations with the Turkish Company for the purchase of more than 40 MRTP 33's!! --------------------


can you build your own Nucleur Submarine....Do we need them?
-------------------
Why not.??? they give an unprescendent capability to a nation's militry power.
You seem to claim that Turkey is this 'great military power house' why not have them. Numbers does not make any refrence to how good a military power is, expereince and fighting is where the evidence lies to how a military can be seen in the world.
Can you please show me where I claim that Turkey is this 'great military power house'!! Also, the European Union manufactures their own Fighters, Frigates etc but they don't even have nuclear subs (with the exception of France and the UK)
-------------------
can you build your own SAM system....YES, 6 Turkish companies have bidded on current Turkish SAM tenders. ROKETSAN is one of the major companies, well know for this kind of technology. Please see, ANNOUNCEMENT RELATED TO THE COMPANIES WHO HAVE PROVIDED RESPONSE TO THE TURKISH MEDIUM ALTITUDE AIR DEFENCE MISSILE SYSTEM (T-MALADMIS) REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) (September 6th, 2007)

-------------------
Again a current bid, nothing tangable. Will it be able to compete with the likes of the s300 and patriot systems...again very much doubt. I draw your attention to the Turkish procurement law! Companies which have not proven their concepts cannot bid. Hence, I hate to shatter your beliefs but the Turkish companies mentioned above have proven their offers!! In relation to how they will compare with the s300, s400 or Patriot systems. I don't know! It remains to be seen...But how effective is the Patriots when compared with the s400? Every system has its +'s and also its negatives! ------------------------

Can you build your own Destroyer/Frigate... YES, look at the MILGEM project and TF-2000 project!
-----------------
ok, this one i will give it to you, as this is more tangable...i.e. should be out on sea trial soon, if not already. and within the turkish forces in 2010.
-----------------


TURKEY ONLY LACKS THE ABILITY TO MARKET ITS PRODUCTS DUE TO POOR IMAGE!!! BUT WAIT ANOTHER 5 YEARS AND YOU SHALL DEFINATELY SEE TURKISH PRODUCTS WORLDWIDE.

-----------------------
It will take Turkey more then 5 years for it to be comparable with the likes of BAE systems, Lockheed, Suhkoi, and so forth, if it will ever be able to acheive that status...!!!
We are talking about Companies that have been at the forfront of inovation for Decades they are THE inventors not the followers.
Turkey will never achieve what BAE, Lockheed or Suhkoi achieved in this century, but this won't be because of capabilities...It will be because of poor marketing! I can assure you that Turkey's reliance on foreign systems will be greatly diminished in 5 years time!
-----------------------
Turkey has developed so much technology in the last 5 years that even the Turkish Armed Forces is surprised! We have our own stealth technology...We are working on highly advanced radar systems similar to those used in AGEIS warships! We have developed Helmet-mouted cuing systems for use in the T-129 Attack Helli, Our F-16 CCIP, F-4 and F-5 aircraft!
Khan_Han is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 21:44 PM   #104 (permalink)
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
 
Gun Grape's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-12-05
Location: Panama City Fl
Posts: 4,244
Country:
Well, I'm not going to vote, but, why isn't the AH-1W on the list?

It has better High/Hot capabilities than the AH-64.

It also carries a better assortment of weapons.

So while I would prefer to have a Apache supporting me in Bosnia, I want a SeaCobra doing the dirty in the mountains of Afghanistan.
Gun Grape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2007, 00:37 AM   #105 (permalink)
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,386
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by KHAN_HAN View Post
Turkey has developed so much technology in the last 5 years that even the Turkish Armed Forces is surprised!
I'm surprised too. I'm surprised at your claims. When the Turkish Armed Forces are no longer using BTRs and M113s, Pattons and Leopards, then they can claim they've got an independent MIC that can support their armed forces. Morever is it just me or does Turkey not own a single tac or strat SAM?
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share this thread with friends:



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How China Loses The Coming Space War HKDan The Rise of China 19 10-02-2009 01:23 AM
Liberals Blame America for Nick Berg's Death Leader American Politics 43 08-20-2007 04:30 AM
2003 Navy Global Conops Defcon 6 Naval Forces 6 07-06-2006 22:26 PM
Golden age for mercenaries Great Lencucha General History 10 03-02-2006 21:57 PM
A Preemptive Attack on Iran's Nuclear Facilities: Possible Consequences lulldapull International Defense Topics 14 11-20-2004 16:27 PM

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:48 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting and a specialist in joomla hosting services.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.