View Poll Results: Best Attack Helecopter

Voters
217. You may not vote on this poll
  • AH64D Apache Longbow

    117 53.92%
  • A129 Augusta Mangusta

    9 4.15%
  • Mi 28 Havoc

    19 8.76%
  • Kamov Ka52 Blackshark varients

    46 21.20%
  • Eurocopter Tigre

    17 7.83%
  • Rooivalk AH-2As

    9 4.15%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 14 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 203

Thread: Attack Helicopters

  1. #46
    Banned Shipwreck's Avatar
    Join Date
    07 Jan 06
    Posts
    2,347
    Quote Originally Posted by glyn View Post
    I was unaware of that dear heart. These might well have been surprise meetings between armed (and armoured) helicopters. In which case which pilot ever born could resist shooting at his enemy? I'm sure we would all welcome the chance to engage a target of opportunity. Do you know the results of those engagements?
    For the Cobra vs Hind engagements, the scores I've seen here and there vary between 10:6 in favor of the AH-1 and 10:6 in favor of the Mi-24. The Cobra vs Hind engagement that took place in November 1980 near Dezfûl (Iran) is said to be the first helo duel in history.

    The Iraqis claimed their choppers (Mi-8, Mi-24/25, SA-342) destroyed 53 Iranian helos during the war of 1980-88.
    Last edited by Shipwreck; 16 May 07, at 17:06.

  2. #47
    Field mechanik Senior Contributor omon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Nov 06
    Location
    bk
    Posts
    3,192
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Shipwreck View Post
    Would you guys know of Russian sources (preferrably on-line) that would provide detailed stats on Soviet air losses (by type / by date / by cause) during the Afghan campaign ? (Russian language not a problem for me)
    A Brief Guide to Russian Combat Aircraft

    it only describes crashes that were fatal, but there were crashes that were not.
    Last edited by omon; 16 May 07, at 18:33.

  3. #48
    Banned Shipwreck's Avatar
    Join Date
    07 Jan 06
    Posts
    2,347
    Quote Originally Posted by omon View Post
    A Brief Guide to Russian Combat Aircraft

    it only describes crashes that were fatal, but there were crashes that were not.
    Thanks Omon.

    I ran across this website when I researched the subject. This page on the site has some interesting charts, but no source is given for the data.

    From what I've observed, most US sources refer to The Bear Went Over The Mountain : Soviet Combat Tactics in Afghanistan by Lester W. Grau where it says :

    The Soviets lost 118 jets, 333 helicopters, 147 tanks, 1314 armored personnel carriers, 433 artillery pieces and mortars, 1138 radio sets and CP vehicles, 510 engineering vehicles and 11369 trucks
    The source given for the figures above is a manuscript by Aleksandr Lyakhovskiy entitled "Tragediya i doblest' Afghan", which, I presume, refers itself to other Soviet sources.

    I haven't been able to get hold of this manuscript yet, so perhaps someone on the board has read it and/or can provide further information on the primary sources available in the former Soviet Union.

  4. #49
    Contributor hello's Avatar
    Join Date
    31 May 05
    Posts
    697
    Quote Originally Posted by glyn View Post
    I'm not so sure that you can draw that conclusion. Most helicopters today are not armoured at all and when sent to trouble spots armour plate is added to the crew seats and anti-IR devices fitted. If the trouble spot is hot, high and humid you will see a quite serious drop in the helicopters efficiency. It can not attain the same ceiling, the rate of climb will be impaired, the payload will be less and the range reduced. Added to that it won't handle as well, and the pilot has to adjust his flying skills to the clunker he is now handling. As I'm sure you know, weight is the choppers enemy. Most helicopters are general purpose machines that can be used to fulfil many roles. Armoured Attack Helos are really only optimised for the one task. They are not used for cargo or personnel movement (I know the Hind can carry a squad, but western ones can't). If an anti-helicopter class of rotary wing aircraft were to be created it would only be because of a perceived operational requirement by the general staff. It would then have to get agreement from the Treasury. I feel this to be most unlikely (especially in the UK!) unless and until some other country introduces such a craft. Even then other countries would wait to see how valid the concept was before embarking on an Anti-Helicopter programme of their own. If it were to happen, the designers would face unique challenges. I mean, what weight and size would be necessary to ensure the requisite lethality? How much would they cost? How many countries could afford to buy and operate them? Are they really necessary? I have no doubt the conventional helicopters will encounter enemy helicopters on occasion. I would imagine that only a few rounds of machine gun fire will be exchanged before they get out of each others way. (Just my feelings on the subject).
    Dedicated air-to-air helicopters are completely useless in my opinion. If a group of helis ever encounter enemy helis and have a problem dealing with them, can't they just call for fighter support? An F-16 or MiG-29 level or above fighter should be more than sufficient to deal with the heli problem. Only the country which doesn't have air superiority will need to care about this, and even if they do bring in dedicated A2A rotorcraft, fighter jets are still too much for them.

  5. #50

    Join Date
    05 Sep 05
    Posts
    643
    I guess Rooivalk is not doing that well after all
    Arms maker to provide defence force with 264 combat vehicles

    Political Correspondent

    CAPE TOWN — Struggling arms maker Denel has been given an R8bn vehicle contract lifeline by Armscor. This comes hard on the heels of its failure to win a bid to supply Turkey with Rooivalk helicopters.

    Denel has now decided that the Rooivalk, on whose development the government spent R8bn, is not commercially viable and it will not spend any new money on the helicopters.

    Armscor and the defence department will now have to decide whether to subsidise the maintenance of Denel’s Rooivalk capability so that it can continue servicing the 12 helicopters bought by the South African Air Force over their 25-year lifespan.

    The other option would be for the air force to mothball the helicopters and for the costs to be written off entirely.

    Denel group CEO Shaun Liebenberg announced Denel’s decision on the Rooivalk and details of the Armscor contract — the biggest in the company’s history — ahead of Public Enterprises Minister Alec Erwin’s budget vote speech in Parliament yesterday.

    He said Denel would not be able to afford to look after the air force’s Rooivalk aircraft in the future.

    “There are some big strategic decisions which the air force and the shareholder must make on this product. The government could decide to subsidise it because of the defence force’s operational requirements,” said Liebenberg.

    Erwin said in an interview that the departments of defence and public enterprises would have to decide later in the year what to do about the Rooivalk.

    The R8bn Armscor contract, known as Project Hoefyster, would see Denel Land Systems supply the South African National Defence Force with 264 infantry combat vehicles in five variants over 10 years.

    The new-generation combat vehicle would replace the Ratel and would be based on a Finnish Patria platform with a Denel- designed turret. It would be an 8x8-wheeled vehicle in the 25-ton class to transport and protect infantry troops.

    “The contract signifies a tremendous boost to local industry and the economy,” Liebenberg said. “This contract puts Denel Land Systems on the road to sustainability” as well as commercial viability. South African companies would deliver more than 70% f the total value of the contract, 18% of which would be for the development of the turret systems.

    Denel as main contractor would involve numerous local defence companies and subcontractors such as BAE Systems’ subsidiary Land Systems OMC in delivering the product.

    The vehicle itself would be built locally under a Patria licence.
    http://www.businessday.co.za/article...?ID=BD4A466341

  6. #51
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    15 Sep 06
    Posts
    6,755
    Quote Originally Posted by hello View Post
    If a group of helis ever encounter enemy helis and have a problem dealing with them, can't they just call for fighter support? An F-16 or MiG-29 level or above fighter should be more than sufficient to deal with the heli problem. Only the country which doesn't have air superiority will need to care about this, and even if they do bring in dedicated A2A rotorcraft, fighter jets are still too much for them.
    The helicopters are not such an easy target as many seem to think. If the fighter boys were to come down to the altitudes the choppers operate at they would be shifting fuel like there's no tomorrow and entering a zone defended by AAA and/or SAMs/Manpads. The choppers will be working in the FEBA/FLOT area, usually at extemely low level ( typically under 20 feet, and often at slow speed). The speed differential would be enormous and jinking targets are not the easiest to bag. In the trials I was involved with years ago, it was found that 'at least' 2 fighters, preferably more, were required to down a single helo - and that didn't assume a forward battle scenario. The fighters couldn't persist in the cat(s) and mouse game for long due to their fuel consumption.
    Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.

  7. #52
    Contributor
    Join Date
    06 Oct 06
    Posts
    548
    That certainly doesn't sound right - right now, radar guided AAM's have no problems hitting low-flying aircraft, be they cruise missiles, fighters or helis.

    They can be launched with a huge altitude difference, they're hard to spoof, and there's no hiding from radar for a heli save for actually placing terrain between itself and the radar.

    F-15's can pick up a heli sitting on the ground from 50nm so long as the rotor's turning - AWACS, much farther. And A-10 has shot down a heli in a dive from 8000' without much trouble - with gun. I wouldn't want to be flying a helicopter in a fighter-infested battleground, unless my own fighters were around to make themselves priority targets for enemy fighters.

  8. #53
    Banned Shipwreck's Avatar
    Join Date
    07 Jan 06
    Posts
    2,347
    Quote Originally Posted by GGTharos View Post
    And A-10 has shot down a heli in a dive from 8000' without much trouble - with gun.
    The A-10s scored two air-to-air kills during ODS.

    The first one on 6 February 1991, when Capt. Bob Swain of the 706th TFS (flying s/n 77-0205) shot down one of two Iraqi BO-105s (presumably). After two unsuccessful locks on the first pass, Swain re-attacked twice with his GAU-8, firing a total of approx. 375 bullets (75 + 300).

    The second one on 15 February 1991, when Capt. Todd Sheehy of the 511th TFS (flying s/n 81-0964) shot down one Mi-8. Sheehy made two passes, firing a total of approx. 500 bullets (300 + 200).

    In both cases, the Iraqi choppers were unarmed and it took a fair amount of 30mm ammos to bring them down.
    Last edited by Shipwreck; 19 May 07, at 21:16.

  9. #54
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    15 Sep 06
    Posts
    6,755
    Quote Originally Posted by GGTharos View Post
    That certainly doesn't sound right - right now, radar guided AAM's have no problems hitting low-flying aircraft, be they cruise missiles, fighters or helis.
    You are probably right. I last flew a helicopter in 1980 so obviously my views are long out of date. I have read though of helos themselves being fitted with A2A missiles, but I don't know how effective they might be against really fast movers.
    Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.

  10. #55
    Contributor
    Join Date
    06 Oct 06
    Posts
    548
    You're pretty right against fighters with guns and heaters though! Helis are tough targets (but that may be changing with the introduction of FPA-based seekers now) if they play their cards right.

    As for helis being fitted with A2A weapons: The Marine Cobra (AH-1Z or W? I forget which) is cleared for and flies with AIM-9's.

    AH-64's were cleared for Stinger stacks, IIRC, and Ka-50's for Igla-V stacks, but neither helicopter uses them operationally - my guess is they're not expected to use them at all (you can't -really- do more than get a lucky shot against a fighter, and against a heli you may as well just use the onboard payload - ie. hellfires). I don't know the official rationale for this though, it's just my guess.

    The Marine Cobra's have a slightly different mandate when escorting rescue choppers, I'd imagine they're expected to defend those against other helis as well as low flying attack aircraft, as opposed to avoid them which is what Army helis are supposed to do, IIRC - so it may not be a matter of effectiveness at all.

    Quote Originally Posted by glyn View Post

    You are probably right. I last flew a helicopter in 1980 so obviously my views are long out of date. I have read though of helos themselves being fitted with A2A missiles, but I don't know how effective they might be against really fast movers.

  11. #56
    Defense Professional
    Join Date
    18 Jun 04
    Posts
    1,632
    Quote Originally Posted by Shipwreck View Post
    The A-10s scored two air-to-air kills during ODS.

    The first one on 6 February 1991, when Capt. Bob Swain of the 706th TFS (flying s/n 77-0205) shot down one of two Iraqi BO-105s (presumably). After two unsuccessful locks on the first pass, Swain re-attacked twice with his GAU-8, firing a total of approx. 375 bullets (75 + 300).

    The second one on 15 February 1991, when Capt. Todd Sheehy of the 511th TFS (flying s/n 81-0964) shot down one Mi-8. Sheehy made two passes, firing a total of approx. 500 bullets (300 + 200).

    In both cases, the Iraqi choppers were unarmed and it took a fair amount of 30mm ammos to bring them down.
    TWO PASSES against slow target!!! I guess the Kamov guys were right in their evaluation of A-10.... without stabilized targeting system its gun is good only against slow onground targets like a tank.... it is definitelly not a A2A platform!!!

    Hei GGTharos, seems like you were right on the radar on Ka-50 on the picture... In one Russian forum the guy who participated it tests stated that it was a mock up radar on that particular foto.... the empty body of the radar made for flight testing. However, it was tested with functioning radar......

  12. #57
    Defense Professional
    Join Date
    18 Jun 04
    Posts
    1,632
    Quote Originally Posted by Shipwreck View Post
    Would you guys know of Russian sources (preferrably on-line) that would provide detailed stats on Soviet air losses (by type / by date / by cause) during the Afghan campaign ? (Russian language not a problem for me)
    Quote Originally Posted by omon View Post
    A Brief Guide to Russian Combat Aircraft

    it only describes crashes that were fatal, but there were crashes that were not.
    Hi Shipwrick and Omon, I remember reading links in Russian. The statistics on losses in Afghanistan are declassified and are available in Russian libriaries.... there is a big book giving details for more than a half of all pilot losses in Afghanistan.

    In total, 333 Soviet helicopters and 108 jets were lost, killing 465 pilots and technicians.
    out of total losses 20-30% were estimated as non combat losses. Stingers were reported for mere 10% of total losses, against total of 1500 detected lauches. A paradox is that stingers took much higher toll against fixed wing aircraft.... shot down at lower atlitudes.... around half of downed aircraft are for the account of stingers. Most of helicopter losses were due to 12.5mm DSHK machine guns.... + RPG fired during landing and take offs.

    these are some links which I found

    ÎÔÈÖÈÀËÜÍÛÅ ÄÀÍÍÛÅ Î ÑÎÂÅÒÑÊÈÕ ÏÎÒÅÐßÕ Â ÀÔÃÀÍÈÑÒÀÍÅ. Êàðòà ¹ 24-25

    ÆÀÐÊÎÅ ÍÅÁÎ ÀÔÃÀÍÈÑÒÀÍÀ. Áîåâûå âåðòîë¸òû Ìè-24
    List of Soviet aircraft losses in Afghanistan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    ÂÊÎ
    ÐÎÑÑÈß È ÑÑÑÐ Â ÂÎÉÍÀÕ XX ÂÅÊÀ. Ãëàâà VI. ÏÎÒÅÐÈ ÑÎÂÅÒÑÊÈÕ ÂÎÅÍÍÎÑËÓÆÀÙÈÕ ÏÐÈÍÈÌÀÂØÈÕ Ó×ÀÑÒÈÅ Â ÎÊÀÇÀÍÈÈ ÂÎÅÍÍÎÉ È ÂÎÅÍÍÎ-ÒÅÕÍÈ×ÅÑÊÎÉ ÏÎÌÎÙÈ ÄÐÓÃÈÌ ÑÒÐÀÍÀÌ, À ÒÀÊÆÅ Â ËÈÊÂÈÄÀÖÈÈ ÏÎÃÐÀÍÈ×ÍÛÕ ÂÎÅÍÍÛÕ ÊÎÍÔËÈÊÒΠ(1946-1991 ãã.)
    Last edited by Garry; 31 May 07, at 17:27.

  13. #58
    Padishah Shahanshah Senior Contributor xerxes's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Jan 07
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,440
    Country: Iran
    hi Garry, I rememeber some 10 years ago, they use to show Stinger hits filmed in the Afghansitan in US and Canadian TV channels. By any chance would you know any online source where some of those hits are available.
    thanks in advance
    If we contrast the rapid progress of this mischievous discovery of gunpowder with the slow and laborious advances of reason, science, and the arts of peace, a philosopher, according to his temper, will laugh or weep at the folly of mankind. - Edward Gibbon

  14. #59
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Contrary by Nature.
    zraver's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Oct 06
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    9,269
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Garry View Post
    Hi Shipwrick and Omon, I remember reading links in Russian. The statistics on losses in Afghanistan are declassified and are available in Russian libriaries.... there is a big book giving details for more than a half of all pilot losses in Afghanistan.

    In total, 333 Soviet helicopters and 108 jets were lost, killing 465 pilots and technicians.
    out of total losses 20-30% were estimated as non combat losses. Stingers were reported for mere 10% of total losses, against total of 1500 detected lauches. A paradox is that stingers took much higher toll against fixed wing aircraft.... shot down at lower atlitudes.... around half of downed aircraft are for the account of stingers. Most of helicopter losses were due to 12.5mm DSHK machine guns.... + RPG fired during landing and take offs.

    these are some links which I found

    ÎÔÈÖÈÀËÜÍÛÅ ÄÀÍÍÛÅ Î ÑÎÂÅÒÑÊÈÕ ÏÎÒÅÐßÕ Â ÀÔÃÀÍÈÑÒÀÍÅ. Êàðòà ¹ 24-25

    ÆÀÐÊÎÅ ÍÅÁÎ ÀÔÃÀÍÈÑÒÀÍÀ. Áîåâûå âåðòîë¸òû Ìè-24
    List of Soviet aircraft losses in Afghanistan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    ÂÊÎ
    ÐÎÑÑÈß È ÑÑÑÐ Â ÂÎÉÍÀÕ XX ÂÅÊÀ. Ãëàâà VI. ÏÎÒÅÐÈ ÑÎÂÅÒÑÊÈÕ ÂÎÅÍÍÎÑËÓÆÀÙÈÕ ÏÐÈÍÈÌÀÂØÈÕ Ó×ÀÑÒÈÅ Â ÎÊÀÇÀÍÈÈ ÂÎÅÍÍÎÉ È ÂÎÅÍÍÎ-ÒÅÕÍÈ×ÅÑÊÎÉ ÏÎÌÎÙÈ ÄÐÓÃÈÌ ÑÒÐÀÍÀÌ, À ÒÀÊÆÅ Â ËÈÊÂÈÄÀÖÈÈ ÏÎÃÐÀÍÈ×ÍÛÕ ÂÎÅÍÍÛÕ ÊÎÍÔËÈÊÒΠ(1946-1991 ãã.)

    The stingers effectiveness wasn't in the aircraft it brought down, but in the aircraft it kept up. Up high and inefective where rocket savos and cannon fire the helicopters delivered lost accuracy and concentration degrading thier performance.

  15. #60
    Banned Shipwreck's Avatar
    Join Date
    07 Jan 06
    Posts
    2,347
    Quote Originally Posted by Garry View Post
    The statistics on losses in Afghanistan are declassified and are available in Russian libriaries.... there is a big book giving details for more than a half of all pilot losses in Afghanistan.
    Garry,

    Could you post the complete references for this book (title, author, publisher,...), please ? I'd like to try and get hold of a copy.

    Quote Originally Posted by Garry View Post
    Stingers were reported for mere 10% of total losses, against total of 1500 detected lauches.
    Garry,

    May I ask where you got your figures from for the Stinger ?

    Open sources in the US generally suggest that :

    1. a total of approx. 900-1,200 Stinger missiles were shipped for delivery to the mujaheedins, together with about 250 gripstocks.

    2. Pakistan reportedly withheld approx. 200 of these missiles for its own usage (the so-called *missile tax*).

    3. The mujaheedins fired about 340 Stingers against both Soviet and Communist Afghans jets and helos between 1986 and 1989.

    4. The mujaheedins scored about 269 kills with Stingers during the entire war.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. How China Loses The Coming Space War
    By HKDan in forum East Asia and the Pacific
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 02 Oct 09,, 07:23
  2. Liberals Blame America for Nick Berg's Death
    By Leader in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 20 Aug 07,, 10:30
  3. 2003 Navy Global Conops
    By Defcon 6 in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07 Jul 06,, 04:26
  4. Golden age for mercenaries
    By Great Lencucha in forum Ancient, Medieval & Early Modern Ages
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03 Mar 06,, 02:57
  5. A Preemptive Attack on Iran's Nuclear Facilities: Possible Consequences
    By lulldapull in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 20 Nov 04,, 21:27

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts