2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-2007, 17:26 PM   #16 (permalink)
omon
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
 
omon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Location: bk
Posts: 1,869
Country:
this one is funny
Attached Images
File Type: jpg s37-1.jpg (16.9 KB, 127 views)
omon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2007, 19:13 PM   #17 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,089
Country:
A technology demonstrator killing an active fighter one generation more advanced? Come on, it could happen...
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2007, 19:14 PM   #18 (permalink)
GGTharos
Contributor
 
Join Date: 10-06-06
Posts: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarquezRazor View Post
With the gun,1 should be sufficient with missiles.
Not that simple - at that range the F-22 can actually exit missile parameters in the blink of an eye. Besides which, you're not launching a missile in one frame, period.

Also, you can't really call a gun kill after 'terminate' is called. For all you know that Raptor is just diving for speed and the hornet pilot is using that to get his 15 seconds of glory.
GGTharos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2007, 19:15 PM   #19 (permalink)
GGTharos
Contributor
 
Join Date: 10-06-06
Posts: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
A technology demonstrator killing an active fighter one generation more advanced? Come on, it could happen...
Yep, easily - this is the kind of fight the Raptor would seek to avoid - but it's still good enough to win it just about every time.

There's no combat aircraft that is untouchable - all it takes is a little bad luck (or bad training)
GGTharos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2007, 00:10 AM   #20 (permalink)
MarquezRazor
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 12-03-06
Posts: 1,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGTharos View Post
Not that simple - at that range the F-22 can actually exit missile parameters in the blink of an eye.
May or MAYNOT.

Quote:
Besides which, you're not launching a missile in one frame, period.
1frame is sufficient for IR.
MarquezRazor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2007, 01:10 AM   #21 (permalink)
hello
Contributor
 
hello's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-31-05
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
A technology demonstrator killing an active fighter one generation more advanced? Come on, it could happen...
That burning plane looks more like a MiG-29 to me. Look at its tail and LERX.

It's a tech demonstrator destroying a half-generation older fighter than itself.

Last edited by hello : 02-27-2007 at 01:14 AM.
hello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2007, 11:57 AM   #22 (permalink)
Maximus
OMGWTFPWNED!
Senior Contributor
 
Maximus's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-31-04
Location: India
Posts: 876
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
You have to keep in mind that this was an exercise. The TR's say 15 frames for a gun kill. IRL, the Hornet probably overshoots, and the Raptor comes back around and kills the Hornet, who has expended all his energy to get his nose on the Raptor (however briefly).
That is correct.

Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
If missiles were involved, the Raptor would most likely have already taken out the Hornet from BVR. It's not really possible to draw conclusions from a single frame.
Even WVR, the Raptor has a lower heat signature due to lower drag. In the picture, if the Hornet had fired off a heater on the Raptor, then it could have been easily avoided by the Raptor.

While fighting BVR, a Slammer fired off from a Raptor would have a higher(upto 33%) RMax2. And the Superhornet won't be able to get a lock even at 100 meters.
__________________
Self-control is the chief element in self-respect, and self-respect is the chief element in courage.
Maximus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2007, 12:05 PM   #23 (permalink)
Maximus
OMGWTFPWNED!
Senior Contributor
 
Maximus's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-31-04
Location: India
Posts: 876
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horrido View Post
The crazy thing is, not even guns are very useful, unless you get lucky, because you can't get a lock on the F-22 at even close range for the lead indicator to work. You'd have to get very lucky to put the bullets in the right place.
Wait a minute! I just thought of it.. Isnt there like a targeting funnel in HUD that allows the pilot to fire a gun on the target without having to lock?
Maximus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2007, 14:37 PM   #24 (permalink)
MarquezRazor
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 12-03-06
Posts: 1,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximus View Post
Wait a minute! I just thought of it.. Isnt there like a targeting funnel in HUD that allows the pilot to fire a gun on the target without having to lock?
Yup.But that wouldnt be too accurate.
MarquezRazor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2007, 18:31 PM   #25 (permalink)
GGTharos
Contributor
 
Join Date: 10-06-06
Posts: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarquezRazor View Post
May or MAYNOT.
With that closure, IT WILL.

Quote:
1frame is sufficient for IR.
If you've gone through the trouble of locking onto target and whatnot already, yes, otherwise, no. This guy is inside sidewinder Rmin, and closing fast - the initial VC is 200, which is only increasing - but if we do stick with 200, these two pass by each other in about 3 sec.
GGTharos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2007, 00:14 AM   #26 (permalink)
Horrido
Staff Emeritus
Chief Subversive
 
Horrido's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-04-03
Location: Secure, and undisclosed.
Posts: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximus View Post
Wait a minute! I just thought of it.. Isnt there like a targeting funnel in HUD that allows the pilot to fire a gun on the target without having to lock?
I've heard that mentioned before, and it's about your only option. Like I said, good luck! lol

I liked one comment regarding two stealth aircraft attempting to engage each other:

"MARCO!"

WHOOOOSH!

"POLO!"

WHOOOOSH!

"MARCO!"...
__________________
The black flag is raised: Ban them all... Let the Admin sort them out.

I know I'm going to have the last word... I have powers of deletion and lock.
Horrido is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2007, 00:42 AM   #27 (permalink)
MarquezRazor
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 12-03-06
Posts: 1,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGTharos View Post
With that closure, IT WILL.
Conjecture.

Quote:
If you've gone through the trouble of locking onto target and whatnot already, yes, otherwise, no
If the Raptor is in the HUD and you try to lock in from this distance,it will directly to to the atk submode.Thats 1 frame.In the next frame you will just be letting the missile go.
MarquezRazor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2007, 02:45 AM   #28 (permalink)
chankya
Contributor
 
chankya's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-06-07
Location: San Jose
Posts: 666
Country:
History

Thats the way military history has always been. Someone comes up with a smaller RCS. Someone will invent a better radar.

one easy way would be to look for a bumblebee doing mach 2 at 60000 ft.

As for dissing the PAKFA. Russian planes operate and operate well under extreme condition. American equipment almost invariable needs Tender Loving Care. Case in point... The Abrams tank. More tanks are lost due to desert weather and resultant equipment fatigue than are lost in combat.

The germans made the awesome weapons in WWII. Yet they lost becuase the russians made a heck of a lot more OK weapons! And yes.... it was the russians and gen. winter that won WWII. The rest of you just made it shorter.
chankya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2007, 02:52 AM   #29 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by chankya View Post
...Russian planes operate and operate well under extreme condition.
Tell that to the Serbs...
__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar...
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2007, 02:58 AM   #30 (permalink)
chankya
Contributor
 
chankya's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-06-07
Location: San Jose
Posts: 666
Country:
Serbs

maybe when nothing on the ground is being hit its not really worth sending up aircraft.

he Kosovo Cover-Up
chankya is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IAF & USAF to Engage in Red Flag Exercises MarquezRazor Military Aviation 39 11-12-2007 21:40 PM
One Raptor Loss at Red Flag outofshdw Military Aviation 22 03-11-2007 19:16 PM
Military Planners In Iraq May Soon Be Seeing 'Red' Shek The War in Iraq 1 01-19-2007 15:23 PM
Red Arrow 8L gains greater capabilities Davis_Chan Land Forces 30 09-03-2006 05:48 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:08 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8