+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 96

Thread: Kamov Ka-50 "Black Shark"???

  1. #46
    Patron Ruskiy's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Nov 06
    Location
    Washington State, USA
    Posts
    175
    Country: United States
    Dmitriy, I'm completly agree with you.
    Наша жизнь как пианино: белая клавиша, черная клавиша и крышка

  2. #47
    Patron Ruskiy's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Nov 06
    Location
    Washington State, USA
    Posts
    175
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by GGTharos View Post
    If someone saw it in a battlefield they'd execute their counter-air drill.
    Yes, they will execute their counter air drill, destroy their own choppers, drink couple litters of vodka (they would think that they are glitching), and then commit suicide =)
    Наша жизнь как пианино: белая клавиша, черная клавиша и крышка

  3. #48
    Regular
    Join Date
    18 Jun 06
    Location
    Brussels
    Posts
    30
    Country: "East-"Ukraine
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruskiy View Post
    Dmitriy, I'm completly agree with you.
    Glad to hear that.

    Can someone provide me numbers of how many lift the Mi-28's wings provide.
    I know that in horizontal flight 25-30% lift of total lift is provided by the wing s of the Mi-24.

  4. #49
    Contributor
    Join Date
    06 Oct 06
    Posts
    548
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruskiy View Post
    Yes, they will execute their counter air drill, destroy their own choppers, drink couple litters of vodka (they would think that they are glitching), and then commit suicide =)

    I think you had a little too much vodka

  5. #50
    Contributor
    Join Date
    06 Oct 06
    Posts
    548
    Quote Originally Posted by Дмитрий View Post
    Hehe, da.
    Mne tozje otchen nravitsa Mi-24, no dvatsatvosmoj zdelan tolka dla boya.
    And when people have to admit that the Mi-28 is better than apach then some people try to claim that the 28 was develloped later than the apache.
    What is not true.
    'People' don't have to admit to anything. Right now the Mi-28 is the only Russian heli to 'catch up' with Apache - it is probably better in some things, likely worse in some others.

    It remains to be seen wether it will be a hangar queen like the Apache - russians had time to design that out, so good luck to that

  6. #51
    Patron Ruskiy's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Nov 06
    Location
    Washington State, USA
    Posts
    175
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by GGTharos View Post
    'People' don't have to admit to anything. Right now the Mi-28 is the only Russian heli to 'catch up' with Apache - it is probably better in some things, likely worse in some others.

    It remains to be seen wether it will be a hangar queen like the Apache - russians had time to design that out, so good luck to that
    Thanks, but actually KA-50 is equal to Apache, MI-28 boots KA-50 easily which means that Apache is not so good. But actually Apache is combat proved...
    Наша жизнь как пианино: белая клавиша, черная клавиша и крышка

  7. #52
    Contributor
    Join Date
    06 Oct 06
    Posts
    548
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruskiy View Post
    Thanks, but actually KA-50 is equal to Apache,
    No it isn't. Who told you that?
    Apache is much better in terms of avionics.

    MI-28 boots KA-50 easily which means that Apache is not so good. But actually Apache is combat proved...
    I think because Mi-28 has newer construction it probably does better than Apache in a number of departments, but Apache electronics are likely better.

  8. #53
    Military Professional canoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    13 Aug 05
    Posts
    665
    Country: Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruskiy View Post
    Thanks, but actually KA-50 is equal to Apache, MI-28 boots KA-50 easily which means that Apache is not so good. But actually Apache is combat proved...
    As I understand it, the Apache has better avionics leading to better sensor data, weapon accuracy and automation of flight systems.

    Thanks its its very accurate weaponary as well as its ability to detect and automatically identify then destroy targets as a tank killer the Apache Longbow with a load of Hellfires still has no peer.

    In other areas the Mi-28 and KA-50 would probably do just as well or perhaps better. As you stated though the Apache has a very robust battle record, thus far the KA-50 still has to prove itself, war has a funny way of highlighting ever imaginable fault with a peice of kit.

  9. #54
    Banned
    Join Date
    20 Nov 06
    Posts
    31
    Country: United States
    Sorry i dont have information about it

  10. #55
    Patron Ruskiy's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Nov 06
    Location
    Washington State, USA
    Posts
    175
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by GGTharos View Post
    No it isn't. Who told you that?
    Apache is much better in terms of avionics.



    I think because Mi-28 has newer construction it probably does better than Apache in a number of departments, but Apache electronics are likely better.
    In 2001 on comparing flights of Apache and Night Hunter in Sweeden MI-28N showed itself a lot better than Apache and Sweedish had to admit that 28 is better.
    Наша жизнь как пианино: белая клавиша, черная клавиша и крышка

  11. #56
    Regular
    Join Date
    18 Jun 06
    Location
    Brussels
    Posts
    30
    Country: "East-"Ukraine
    Quote Originally Posted by canoe View Post
    ...the Apache Longbow with a load of Hellfires still has no peer.
    Well The Mi-28 can carry more weapon load than a Apache.
    He can carry full load of 16 ataka or shturm AND 40 S-8.
    Plus it's gun is more powerfull than the Apache's one.

    And don't forget that the program suffered from funding problems and the fact that it was frozen.
    Without those problems they could have upgradet it a couple times and then it would have been even better.

    Like you stated that the comache was a very good heli but didn't entered in the air force because of the money, I can say that the lack of fundings prevented the 28 of being develloped in it's best version/ upgrades
    That program was frozen for more than 20 years.If it wasn't frozen than there would be a even better variant of it today.

    If we are comparing the basic 28 versus basic Apache.
    Then it will be deffinatly the 28 who wins: larger payload, better defence and surviveability.
    The Apache may have better avionics (basic vs. basic), but with avionics alone you won't come far, if you can be shot out of the sky by an old man's gun.
    Versus a tank it may be very effective But that's not a real battle.
    So has the 28 or even the 24 no problems of shooting at a tank from a distance.

    The big difference is like a soldier with and without a bulletfree jacket. (apart from the avionics)

  12. #57
    Patron Ruskiy's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Nov 06
    Location
    Washington State, USA
    Posts
    175
    Country: United States
    Both MI-28 Night Hunter and MI-24 Hind doesn't have any prodlem in a combat situations.
    Here's the proof:

    MI-28N

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...459953&q=Mi-28

    MI-24H

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...608913&q=MI-24

    By watching those videos I'd say thet MI-28 and MI-24 are better than even KA-50
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...875241&q=KA-50

    Those MIL's babies can handle a lot and 24th handeled almost every war since the end of 1970s.
    28th will handle the same as his bro did, the only reason betwen them (why 24th fought and 28 didn't?) is that 28th project was frozen shortly after start, 24th went out later and only in the middle of 90th Russia had unlocked 28th Mil and wormed it with its completion.
    Наша жизнь как пианино: белая клавиша, черная клавиша и крышка

  13. #58
    Regular
    Join Date
    18 Jun 06
    Location
    Brussels
    Posts
    30
    Country: "East-"Ukraine
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruskiy View Post
    Both MI-28 Night Hunter and MI-24 Hind doesn't have any prodlem in a combat situations.
    Here's the proof:

    MI-28N

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...459953&q=Mi-28

    MI-24H

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...608913&q=MI-24

    By watching those videos I'd say thet MI-28 and MI-24 are better than even KA-50
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...875241&q=KA-50

    Those MIL's babies can handle a lot and 24th handeled almost every war since the end of 1970s.
    28th will handle the same as his bro did, the only reason betwen them (why 24th fought and 28 didn't?) is that 28th project was frozen shortly after start, 24th went out later and only in the middle of 90th Russia had unlocked 28th Mil and wormed it with its completion.

    Indeed the Mi-24 served in olmost 30 conflicts.

    About the Ka-50 I have to disagree, cause the Ka-50 is still a very powerfull craft.
    Neverless the Mi-24 and the 28 are olso very good machines.
    They all have a place in my heart.
    The MiL's ofcource can handle much more payload.
    It's just butyfull to see them shooting all those 57 and 80 mm rockets, and especially the Shturm or Ataka

  14. #59
    Military Professional Firral's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Mar 06
    Location
    The Kola peninsula, Russia
    Posts
    348
    Country: Russian Federation
    Quote Originally Posted by Дмитрий View Post
    Indeed the Mi-24 served in olmost 30 conflicts.

    About the Ka-50 I have to disagree, cause the Ka-50 is still a very powerfull craft.
    Neverless the Mi-24 and the 28 are olso very good machines.
    They all have a place in my heart.
    The MiL's ofcource can handle much more payload.
    It's just butyfull to see them shooting all those 57 and 80 mm rockets, and especially the Shturm or Ataka
    Ka-50 and Mi-28 it is helicopters a little different purpose. Mi-28 is the front helicopter intended for support of armies. Ka-50 suits for small operations, such as anti-guerrilla actions, etc.

  15. #60
    Patron Ruskiy's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Nov 06
    Location
    Washington State, USA
    Posts
    175
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Firral View Post
    Ka-50 and Mi-28 it is helicopters a little different purpose. Mi-28 is the front helicopter intended for support of armies. Ka-50 suits for small operations, such as anti-guerrilla actions, etc.
    Pretty true, actually MIL's family is all made for the front aviation accept MI-8 which is most transport helo but still one of the most popular transporters in the front lines of the battles...
    Наша жизнь как пианино: белая клавиша, черная клавиша и крышка

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. India grounds Kamov KA-31 fleet
    By highsea in forum Military Aviation
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 19 Apr 06,, 20:07

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts