2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-28-2006, 06:19 AM   #1 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,972
Country:
Secret plan to lease planes

Secret plan to lease planes

Ian McPhedran

November 29, 2006 11:00pm
Article from: The Courier-Mail

A SECRET plan is being developed to spend hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars, effectively leasing a temporary fighter plane fleet to fill a looming air combat shortfall.
The hired fleet would be at least partly based at Amberley, in southeast Queensland, along with Tindall in the Northern Territory and Williamtown in New South Wales.

The Royal Australian Air Force will retire its ageing fleet of F-111 strike jets from 2010 and won't take delivery of the first of $16 billion of new stealth Joint Strike Fighters until at least 2014.

Any delays to the RAAF's JSF order would result in an air combat capability gap that could last four years or more.

Despite denying any such risk, the RAAF has secretly established a seven-person Air Combat Transition Office to develop "contingency options" to ensure Australia's air combat edge is maintained in the coming decade.

"ACTO is designed to manage the transition from the current force through to the introduction of the new air combat capability and to ensure that Australia continues to maintain its combat capability edge in the coming decades," a spokesman from the Department of Defence said yesterday.

The most likely "gap" option would be to buy two variants of the two-seat Super Hornet including a "G" model electronic jamming version. These could stay in service beyond 2015.

But the most cost-effective measure under consideration would be to buy or lease jet fighters from the US, which has an oversupply.

Aircraft types on the drawing board include additional F/A-18 Hornets or the highly capable longer range F-15 and F-16 or the Eurofighter Typhoon.

A spokesman for Defence Minister Brendan Nelson said the Government was "looking at cost-effective options to ensure Australia maintains air superiority during the transition period".

Earlier this month, air force chief Air Marshal Geoff Shepherd told a Senate inquiry that the RAAF would not allow a capability gap to develop.

"We believe the schedule that the JSF is on at the moment still meets our requirements in the correct timeframe," he said.

Air Marshal Shepherd told the Senate the purchase of a bridging fighter would be the "last resort".

The secret contingency planning followed a directive from Defence Minister Brendan Nelson that the nation's air combat capability must not be compromised under any circumstances.

"Australia will not accept an air combat shortfall," Dr Nelson told the brass after he was briefed on the growing risk of a capability gap.

The fighter replacement project is the most expensive in Australia's history and the RAAF expects to get about 100 aircraft for between $12 billion and $16 billion. The planes would not be formally ordered until late next year if the Howard Government proceeds to contract.

The JSF, which cost more than $100 million each and will replace both the F-111 and F/A-18 Hornet, is not due to make its maiden flight at Lockheed Martin's Texas plant until late next year.

The F-111s, known affectionately as pigs, are massively expensive to keep in the air, but must stay flying until a major upgrade of the RAAF's 71 FA-18 Hornet fighters is completed after 2010.

The upgrade will allow the Hornets to carry short-range cruise missiles and to better defend themselves against electronic threats.

New aircraft projects and major technical upgrades historically run at least one or two years late.

http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/s...62-953,00.html
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2006, 07:08 AM   #2 (permalink)
gf0012-aust
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 05-30-06
Posts: 394
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
Secret plan to lease planes

Ian McPhedran

November 29, 2006 11:00pm
Article from: The Courier-Mail

A SECRET plan is being developed to spend hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars, effectively leasing a temporary fighter plane fleet to fill a looming air combat shortfall.
The hired fleet would be at least partly based at Amberley, in southeast Queensland, along with Tindall in the Northern Territory and Williamtown in New South Wales.

etc etc....................................
Its hardly a secret (well, it is to McPhedran )

Boeing made a cold call approach at the beginning of the year - and made subsequent approaches after that. It was certainly doing the email rounds in April just after Boeing made the first call.

The fleet would only be based at Amberley - ie the same base as the Pigs. All the others are fighter bases currently home to the HUG-Bugs.

There always has been a Plan B interim option in case JSF was running late and to retire the Pigs sooner rather than later.

Nobody has spoken out loud about Plan B though because it would be an embarassment to have to accept that another najor procurement process has been blown out of its timeline by perhaps 18-24 months. On top of the stuff ups by Boeing on Wedgetail, there was some internal mumblings that maybe we should go to another vendor - I'm assuming that this is the last thing that Boeing would want.

I would assume that the lease rates would be attractive - as we certainly don't want to buy them outright due to a number of reasons.

the whole thing becomes even more of a witches brew if other potential customers like Japan and India are factored in.

Last edited by gf0012-aust : 12-28-2006 at 09:22 AM.
gf0012-aust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2006, 08:14 AM   #3 (permalink)
kams
Senior Contributor
 
kams's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-06
Location: Piscatawy, NJ
Posts: 1,462
Country:
Quote:
I would assume that the lease rates would be attractive - as we certainly don't want to buy them outright due to a number of reasons.
Hmmm surprising that US tax payer is not footing the bill (like they do for Pakistan ). You guys did waive the penalty on Boeing for delay in Wedgetail. Least they can do is to return the favor.
kams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2006, 14:41 PM   #4 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by kams View Post
...You guys did waive the penalty on Boeing for delay in Wedgetail. Least they can do is to return the favor.
Well, part of it...maybe....It's really not settled yet.

Boeing took a $500 Million hit for the Wedgetail delays. The cost will be shared by Northrop Grumman, since it was the MESA that wasn't ready on time.
__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar...
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2006, 14:42 PM   #5 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by gf0012-aust View Post
Its hardly a secret (well, it is to McPhedran )
Lol. That's what I was thinking Gary. We've been kicking around the options for a couple years now. McPhedran is just catching on?
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
U.S. had secret 1930 plan to invade Canada Officer of Engineers The World Wars 66 10-28-2006 16:12 PM
PLAN Analysis rickusn Naval Forces 9 06-12-2006 15:05 PM
Pakistan may buy US, Chinese and Soviet planes Neo South Asian Defense Topics 28 05-01-2006 12:06 PM
USN 30-Year Fleet Structure Plan rickusn Naval Forces 0 03-28-2005 18:45 PM
USN 30-Year Fleet Structure Plan rickusn Naval Forces 2 03-25-2005 02:37 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8