2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-29-2008, 17:13 PM   #106 (permalink)
Sumku
Contributor
 
Sumku's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-12-08
Location: Allahabad
Posts: 364
Country:
OOE, I understand that and this clearly reflects in their existing inventory but still I am amazed by the quantum of money being spent here.

I am almost 100% sure that neither India nor China and definitely not Pakistan are spending this quatum of money that rapidly. I mean almost 6-7% of their GDP on defense.

I honestly dont know the relations between Turkey and Iran, Between Turkey and Syria, I know there are some disputes, but how is it between Turkey and Iran I am not sure. Between Turkey and Israel, I know there are very good relations.

Even if there are tensions between Turkey and Iran, Turkey already has quite a firepower over Iran with their existing inventory.

So why spend so much on modernisation when you are already a leader. China is not going to attack Turkey and nether is India or Pakistan or Russia. On top of it Turkey already is a member of NATO. So what is the need.

The claims like
Quote:
I did not assert this...however, I do believe that for SOME missions the TuAF is better equipped than China
to my opinion are a little far fetched as is this one
Quote:
Turkish Air Force is easily in the top 2 in Europe it is easily in the top 5 of Asia!
Spending that percentage of GDP on defence when there are no long-term threat perception, or when you already have massive Superiority over all known adversaries, is to me preparing for WWIII
Sumku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 21:59 PM   #107 (permalink)
TUSAS1
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-19-08
Posts: 45
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
Turkey is not preparing for WWIII. Despite TUSA's enthusiasm, we do have a Turkish combat veteran on this board. His explanations are well within what soldiers see day-to-day. And the day-to-day fact is that a lot of the equipment are reaching the end of their life cycles, so they will have to be replace soon. The question is do you replace them now while the cost factor is still in your favour but your initial outlay would be more or later when you are forced to buy whatever is available because that rusted bucket is now more rust than metal.

While TUSA is vaunting more about the JSF, we identify more with the good Captain when he said he walked more than he ride while still trying to do a mechanized job.
This is partly true Officer of Engineers....The Land Forces WAS ageing....However, to assert that it is dead or lacking the firepower would be a great injustice and dogmatic of the facts. Believe me the Land Forces currently is not as bad as you think it is. I can easily and with comfort state that they are well newer than their European counterparts. Post 2005 alot of things have changed with the Land Forces Command. They once again proved themselves during Operation Sun 3 months ago. It might be interesting to know that the Turkish Land Forces in nearly self-sufficient in terms of Arms procurement. Turkey produces APC, can modernize Tanks, manufactures its ammunition etc. Soon they will be self-sufficient with MBTS and Anti-tank missiles similar in calibre to the Hellfire II (OMTAS and UMTAS Anti-tank missiles- See below)

In my very lengthy factual posting above I did not digress too much into the total overhaul of the Land Forces Command, both technologically and structurally. Turkey's new Land Forces Modernization concept "Force 2014" which is nearly half complete aims to create a force with much more fire power and mobility. In summary it is along these lines: The new strategy is a 20% reduction in man-power, however with the development of a more potent, highly trained, technologically advanced, integrated Land Forces. Some of the new acquisitions are listed below:

Development of Indegenous Anti-tank missiles: Umtas and Omtas Similar to HellFire II Defense Technology International - September 2007
30 Bed Mobile Surgical Hospital and Mobile First Aid Stations
Nuclear Biological Chemical (NBC) Protective Suits Project
Special Purpose Tactical Wheeled Armored Vehicles Procurement Project
Turkish Mobile Floating Assault Briges Project
Weapon Carrier Vehicles Project
Wheeled Tactical Vehicles
Amphibious Armoured Combat Earthmovers Procurement
Field Artillery Ammunition Supply Vehicles Procurement
Tank Transporters and Semi-Traillers
Electronic Target Systems For Tank Firing Rangers
Leopard 1A1/A1A4 Tanks Improvement Project
M60 Tank Modernization Project (Sabra Modernization project of M60 Tanks- Turkey has 1000+ M60 Tanks)
New Command and Control Vehicles
Group- I New Armoured Combat Vehicles and Personnel Carriers
Group-II New Armoured Personnel Carriers
Tank Fire Control System
Turkish National Main Battle Tank Project (Plan for 1000+ Next Generation Indegenous MBT's)
KMS Systems
National Rifles and Snipers
Very small Unmanned Helicopters with Laptop for use in the theatre
Special Uniforms: Product of 10 years research (unable to be seen from space and insulating agaisnt extreme temperatures without affecting the mobility or comfort level of soldiers)
Towed Artilery

and this is just afew. For further information refer to Savunma Sanayii Müsteşarlığı - Ana Sayfa

Below are some Turkish Manufactured Land Forces Platforms which are currently in the inventory as of 2005













Last edited by TUSAS1 : 04-30-2008 at 05:53 AM.
TUSAS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 22:20 PM   #108 (permalink)
TUSAS1
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-19-08
Posts: 45
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sumku View Post
OOE, I understand that and this clearly reflects in their existing inventory but still I am amazed by the quantum of money being spent here.

I am almost 100% sure that neither India nor China and definitely not Pakistan are spending this quatum of money that rapidly. I mean almost 6-7% of their GDP on defense. The Turkish GDP (PPP) at the end of last year was $960 billion.

I honestly dont know the relations between Turkey and Iran, Between Turkey and Syria, I know there are some disputes, but how is it between Turkey and Iran I am not sure. Between Turkey and Israel, I know there are very good relations. Its for deterence and NATO objectives.

Even if there are tensions between Turkey and Iran, Turkey already has quite a firepower over Iran with their existing inventory.

So why spend so much on modernisation when you are already a leader. China is not going to attack Turkey and nether is India or Pakistan or Russia. On top of it Turkey already is a member of NATO. So what is the need.

The claims like to my opinion are a little far fetched as is this one

Spending that percentage of GDP on defence when there are no long-term threat perception, or when you already have massive Superiority over all known adversaries, is to me preparing for WWIII

Sumku, Turkey a former Empire has lost in exess of 2 million sq metres of land during World War I, It also has very unfriendly neighbours who want to wipe countries off the map. Add to this the fact that Turkey borders Cold War rivels Russia.... It is only natural for Turkey to have a strong armed forces. Turkeys strategy is DETERENCE. For this to work you must have a very very strong Military capability. Turkey will always try and have the upper hand in the region. This also suits the western free-world as we are the only democratic, staunchly secular, constitutional Republic in the region. We are also not governed by people who truly and sincerly believe that they are divine.

Last edited by TUSAS1 : 04-29-2008 at 22:27 PM.
TUSAS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 22:50 PM   #109 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,640
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TUSAS1 View Post
However, to assert that it is dead or lacking the firepower would be a great injustice and dogmatic of the facts. Believe me the Land Forces currently is not as bad as you think it is.
1) You don't know what I think.
2) I know the Turks are extremely capable but NOT for any of the reasons you've cited. Like I said, there's a Turkish combat veteran on this board. He has found kindred spirit here and we can discuss operational details that would escape you.

Frankly, I don't care for all your toys that you've listed. I am more interested in the combat leaders ... as do the other veterans on this board.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 22:52 PM   #110 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,640
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sumku View Post
The claims like to my opinion are a little far fetched as is this one
He's a fan boy. I don't take him seriously.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 23:31 PM   #111 (permalink)
TUSAS1
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-19-08
Posts: 45
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
He's a fan boy. I don't take him seriously.
All the posts given above cannot be refuted. After all, we are in no position to know better than the US Central Intelligence Agency or the US Navy. All I have done is cut and paste data from non-Turkish sources as was requested. It is up to you to believe or not to believe the accuracy of government data. This will also reveal who is infact the real "fan boy".
TUSAS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 23:36 PM   #112 (permalink)
TUSAS1
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-19-08
Posts: 45
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
1) You don't know what I think.
2) I know the Turks are extremely capable but NOT for any of the reasons you've cited. Like I said, there's a Turkish combat veteran on this board. He has found kindred spirit here and we can discuss operational details that would escape you.

Frankly, I don't care for all your toys that you've listed. I am more interested in the combat leaders ... as do the other veterans on this board.
(1) I am no Military strategist and I dont claim to be one.
(2) Lets wait and see what the Turkish combat vetran will say...I'm sure it will be along my lines.
(3) What I mentioned was not in relation to operational details but rather defence procurement.

Also, i dont understand why sudenly whole forum is attacking me and my posts? Isn't the purpose of this forum to talk about anything and everything military?
TUSAS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 23:46 PM   #113 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,637
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Quote:
Originally Posted by TUSAS1 View Post
This will also reveal who is infact the real "fan boy".
I'm fairly certain that you are not imply that Officer of Engineers is a fan boy...am I correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TUSAS1 View Post
Also, i dont understand why sudenly whole forum is attacking me and my posts? Isn't the purpose of this forum to talk about anything and everything military?
Probably because you're trying to dictate 'facts' to military professionals who have lived and breathed on battlesfields what you are discussing from the safety and comfort of a computer desk.

You also might want read this post carefully Forum Guidelines (revised 2/15/07)
TopHatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 23:51 PM   #114 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,640
Country:
You've already met him. He is the good Captain UCar and I know for a fact, he doesn't play who is the best game. The Turks are the 2nd best AF in Europe? Give me a break. And in case you've forgotten, those are not your nukes. They're American nukes.

Do a search on his post, the good Captain is a Professional Officer. Someone the rest of us can truly work with. I have no qualms of tasking him with any company level operation.

And as for refuting your posts, I ain't got the time nor the energy to care about fanboy fascination with toys. There's an old saying with the military. The mission 1st. The People Always. Frankly, you don't share either of those concerns.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2008, 00:03 AM   #115 (permalink)
TUSAS1
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-19-08
Posts: 45
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TopHatter View Post
I'm fairly certain that you are not imply that Officer of Engineers is a fan boy...am I correct? Surely, like myself "Officer of Engineers" is also a respectable member in his field, who knows that government documents such as the above i posted dont lie. I am not implying anything.

Probably because you're trying to dictate 'facts' to military professionals who have lived and breathed on battlesfields what you are discussing from the safety and comfort of a computer desk.

No, I am not trying to dictate anything. I am drawing peoples attention to Turkish procurement in the current days. Some things dont need to be experienced in order to know that they exist. Example. The Turkish Prime Minister approves defence procurement contracts, but does he have one on one experience in the field? No he doesnt. Does he know about how the Turkish Armed Forces stacks? You bet he does? How does he know? From briefs given by the Cheif of the General Staff and reports.

I believe that it is very wrong to dismiss everyone that has not been in the field as lay people when it comes to defence. There are engineers, politicians, corporations etc which all work together for defence and they should be most welcome in this forum.


You also might want read this post carefully Forum Guidelines (revised 2/15/07)
a
TUSAS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2008, 00:04 AM   #116 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,637
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Quote:
Originally Posted by TUSAS1 View Post
I believe that it is very wrong to dismiss everyone that has not been in the field as lay people when it comes to defence. There are engineers, politicians, corporations etc which all work together for defence and they should be most welcome in this forum.
They are welcome.

And are you one of them?
TopHatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2008, 00:11 AM   #117 (permalink)
TUSAS1
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-19-08
Posts: 45
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
You've already met him. He is the good Captain UCar and I know for a fact, he doesn't play who is the best game. The Turks are the 2nd best AF in Europe? Give me a break. And in case you've forgotten, those are not your nukes. They're American nukes.

Do a search on his post, the good Captain is a Professional Officer. Someone the rest of us can truly work with. I have no qualms of tasking him with any company level operation.

And as for refuting your posts, I ain't got the time nor the energy to care about fanboy fascination with toys. There's an old saying with the military. The mission 1st. The People Always. Frankly, you don't share either of those concerns.
Sir, with all due respect....stating that the Turkish Air Force is second in Europe should not be a far fetched assertion....Just by looking at the European Air Forces current inventories, the Turkish Air Force can be compared with that of the Luftwaffe, RAF and the French Air Force. The TuAF currently has 519 combat aircraft according to the US Navy. These are 230 F-16, F-4 Terminator 2020, and F-5. They also have alot of combat experience and their pilots are not bad. They have one of the highest number of flight hours after the US Air Force.

Unlike some others on this forum which I have seen, I am not stating that Turkey is a superpower. I am making assertions based on very reputable government documents.

Last edited by TUSAS1 : 04-30-2008 at 00:18 AM.
TUSAS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2008, 00:12 AM   #118 (permalink)
TUSAS1
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-19-08
Posts: 45
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TopHatter View Post
They are welcome.

And are you one of them?
Yes.
TUSAS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2008, 03:42 AM   #119 (permalink)
Shipwreck
Finer than the Finest...
Senior Contributor
 
Shipwreck's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-07-06
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 1,872
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TUSAS1 View Post
Turkey has 3000 M60 Tanks
Source ?
__________________
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called children of God" (Matthew 5:9)
Shipwreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2008, 05:41 AM   #120 (permalink)
TUSAS1
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-19-08
Posts: 45
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
1) You don't know what I think.
2) I know the Turks are extremely capable but NOT for any of the reasons you've cited. Like I said, there's a Turkish combat veteran on this board. He has found kindred spirit here and we can discuss operational details that would escape you.

Frankly, I don't care for all your toys that you've listed. I am more interested in the combat leaders ... as do the other veterans on this board.
Heres what the US Military say about the reason why Turkey has a strong Armed Force:

Quote:
(1) Deterrence: The maintenance of military force that would act as deterrence against internal and external sources of threat in view of instability and uncertainty around Turkey.
(2) Collective Security: Active participation in international and regional alliances/ organizations, particularly NATO and WEU.
(3) Advanced Defense: Detection of the scope of a possible aggression as early as possible and halting an actual aggression from without.
(4) Military Assistance in Crisis Management.

See PARAMETERS, US Army War College Quarterly - Summer 2000
htt_p://www.carlisle.army.mil/USAWC/parameters/00summer/hickok.htm

Last edited by TUSAS1 : 04-30-2008 at 05:43 AM.
TUSAS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stupid Gobal Warming Alarmists Leader Science & Tech 386 04-28-2008 09:32 AM
Who are the top 5 superpowers in the Asia?? aussie South Asian Defense Topics 116 04-28-2008 02:42 AM
Pakistan Economy Neo Political Discussions 3653 11-06-2007 10:30 AM
British India Grundy Political Discussions 187 07-01-2006 07:39 AM
20 Companies Named Asia Pacific's Best at the Frost & Sullivan Asia Pacific Technolog oneman28 Political Discussions 0 06-16-2005 08:49 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:41 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8