2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-27-2004, 10:46 AM   #16 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 1
Yeah, the PLAAF is still mediocre, but they at least have long range bombers- which most in Asia do not.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2004, 13:14 PM   #17 (permalink)
Jay
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 6,020
Country:
Snipe,
Are you talking about the H6 (Tu-16) Bombers?? AFAIK they are really really old, 1950's design to be precise.

On the same note, India is supposed to get 4 (2?) TU-22 Backfires, which is easily one of the best bombers available to date!
__________________
A grain of wheat eclipsed the sun of Adam !!
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2004, 13:38 PM   #18 (permalink)
berkut
Regular
 
Join Date: 05-10-04
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay
Snipe,
Are you talking about the H6 (Tu-16) Bombers?? AFAIK they are really really old, 1950's design to be precise.

On the same note, India is supposed to get 4 (2?) TU-22 Backfires, which is easily one of the best bombers available to date!
If I'm not mistaken India is considering buying SU-34 which will give it superrior deep strike capability. Also arent F-15s that were given to Japan and Korea are the most basic A models?
If you consider US Naval carrier presense then you have to consider China's vast antiship capabilities which significantly reduces USN advantage.

Also somebody here assumed that Russia is part of Asia.... uhm, sure, if you are considering empty land area, but if we are talking about concentration of air bases, infrastructure, and population then it is very much Europe.
berkut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2004, 15:12 PM   #19 (permalink)
Praxus
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-26-03
Posts: 3,237
Quote:
If you consider US Naval carrier presense then you have to consider China's vast antiship capabilities which significantly reduces USN advantage.
All I have to say is...

LOL
Praxus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2004, 15:28 PM   #20 (permalink)
Jay
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 6,020
Country:
Quote:
If you consider US Naval carrier presense then you have to consider China's vast antiship capabilities which significantly reduces USN advantage.
China may have cruise missiles and what not, but first they have to target USN...I think you know what I'm talking about!
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2004, 16:10 PM   #21 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 1
Old bombers are still better than no bombers at all.

The PLAAF would have an extremely difficult time attacking a US CVBG. What's more, it would be even harder for them to find it to begin with.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2004, 16:22 PM   #22 (permalink)
berkut
Regular
 
Join Date: 05-10-04
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
Old bombers are still better than no bombers at all.

The PLAAF would have an extremely difficult time attacking a US CVBG. What's more, it would be even harder for them to find it to begin with.

Whats CVBG? Is that a carrier battle group? If it is then I'm not sure how it is hard to find it. That "rock concert" of noise can be detected even by the 14th centry sonar. Also there's no way somebody will miss the enormous amount of radiation from communication, radars, etc
What about satelites? Give me some money and even I right now can order surveilance from a very well equipped satelite over the Pacific.
berkut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2004, 18:33 PM   #23 (permalink)
Praxus
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-26-03
Posts: 3,237
Hey Smart ass, if it is beyond the horizon chances are it doesn't matter how much radiation it's giving off or how much sound it's making.
Praxus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2004, 19:19 PM   #24 (permalink)
lurker
Contributor
 
lurker's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-12-03
Posts: 696
Send a message via ICQ to lurker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxus
Hey Smart ass, if it is beyond the horizon chances are it doesn't matter how much radiation it's giving off or how much sound it's making.
In a case you haven't noticed - China have satellites, and China is one of only 3 countries that had put a man in space.

For now they are only "the biggest world's sweatshop", but looking how busily all the world supplies them with technology, I would say in 15-20 years they will try to claim their place as a superpower.

And Taiwan would be the 1st step to that claim. The one cannot be a superpower and have such a thing so close.

p.s. let see how their project 9935 will wok out.
__________________
Long time we thought that a million monkeys in front of a million typewriters would eventually type William Shakespeare's complete works.
After invention of the Internet, we understand that it's not true.

Last edited by lurker : 05-27-2004 at 19:38 PM.
lurker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2004, 19:51 PM   #25 (permalink)
Praxus
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-26-03
Posts: 3,237
In case you havn't noticed they can not relay real time information of our Carriers in the Pacific.
Praxus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2004, 20:03 PM   #26 (permalink)
lurker
Contributor
 
lurker's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-12-03
Posts: 696
Send a message via ICQ to lurker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxus
In case you havn't noticed they can not relay real time information of our Carriers in the Pacific.

They have 1 Infra-red/visible imaging "meteorological" geosynchronous sat over Pacific and at least 3 geosynchronous military comsats.

No, I couldn't see why they can't track a bunch of BIG ships in Pacific in realtime.
lurker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2004, 20:45 PM   #27 (permalink)
Praxus
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-26-03
Posts: 3,237
Again they can not provide real time information.
Praxus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2004, 22:13 PM   #28 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 1
Believe me when i tell you that finding a US CVBG at sea on wartime footing is an extremely hard proposition.

If you get a sat image of it by the time that image can be forwarded to the shooters the CVBG will be over 100 nautical miles away(probably much farther), in one of many possible directions.

Closing to attack a CVBG by air means you have to pass an AWACs screen and F-14 interceptors, as well as all the Aegis escorts.

It is probably one of the hardest things in all of warfare to do- attack a US CVBG on wartime footing.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2004, 22:28 PM   #29 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 14,876
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by lurker
In a case you haven't noticed - China have satellites, and China is one of only 3 countries that had put a man in space.

For now they are only "the biggest world's sweatshop", but looking how busily all the world supplies them with technology, I would say in 15-20 years they will try to claim their place as a superpower.

And Taiwan would be the 1st step to that claim. The one cannot be a superpower and have such a thing so close.

p.s. let see how their project 9935 will wok out.
From a long time PLA watcher, the PLA ain't aiming to be a super power. It cannot afford to do so. The PRC ain't the USSR. She has way too many theatres to handle (Russia, India, Taiwan, Korea, Vietnam, Japan, and the US) and I'm not even including the potential challenages from Indonesaia and Australia and Australia would automatically bring in the Brits and the Canadians.

Tracking a CVBG is a hell of alot of work, the former USSR spent over 2 decades doing it and it wasn't easy. One thing that we did know. REFORGER was going to work though quite a few of us would have been kissing a fish.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2004, 22:34 PM   #30 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 14,876
Country:
Oh, btw, don't put too much in Chinese satellite capabilities. To this day, they still cannot implement an early warning system. During the Cold War, their early warning was a mushroom cloud.
Officer of Engineers is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stupid Gobal Warming Alarmists Leader Science & Tech 386 04-28-2008 09:32 AM
Who are the top 5 superpowers in the Asia?? aussie South Asian Defense Topics 116 04-28-2008 02:42 AM
Pakistan Economy Neo Political Discussions 3653 11-06-2007 10:30 AM
British India Grundy Political Discussions 187 07-01-2006 07:39 AM
20 Companies Named Asia Pacific's Best at the Frost & Sullivan Asia Pacific Technolog oneman28 Political Discussions 0 06-16-2005 08:49 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:44 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8