![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
|
Warthog: Flying the A-10 in the Gulf War by William L. Smallwood. I guess it's out of print but if I really wanted it, I'd order it on Alibris.com, used. It was a great read, loved every minute of it.
__________________
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader. ~John Quincy Adams |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
And how bloody stealthy is an A-10 by the way? No attempt to do anything other than kill. They can see it comming? They generally run. Saves DU rounds as well. And resulting lawsuits from Vets. Before any one gets cross, I know that was in poor taste. ![]()
__________________
Where's the bloody gin? An army marches on its liver, not its ruddy stomach. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
The F-4 is still a might in the sky. Right now my dad, who retired AF after 24 years, is working as a civ contractor in South Korea helping train the SKAF with the F-4 and the AMG-142 missile system.
I asked him why they still use F-4's and he said with the new avionics they are still a very formidable aircraft. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) |
|
Contributor
|
If Im not terribly mistaken, the F-4 was used by argentinians during the Falkland war in 1982 I think. I once saw a document on TV where four argentinian F-4 phantoms disabled or destroyed two british battleships. The argentinian fighters were already in 1982 using outdated weapons and electronics still fighting against british battleships who had state of the art technology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
The Argentinians had one. For a brief while. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) |
|
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional |
You're BOTH wrong. He meant to say A-4, NOT F-4. But even A-4s are American-made.
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory." - George Orwell |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,381
Country:
|
F-4 is one of the ugliest fighter ever to be mass produced. Its ugliness is only surpassed by the X-32 Monica.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
I loved watching them fly at Tyndall. It was mildly sad to know that there was a decent chance it would die over the Gulf of Mexico in the HUD of an Eagle, though. Edit: VVV I meant the F-4. Last edited by Jimmy : 03-09-2007 at 22:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,381
Country:
|
No way. Monica was bad. Huge gaping mouth. Fat torso. Thin spindly legs. What the hell was Billy...I mean Boeing, thinking?
Quote:
But it sure did perform though. It was a fine plane. Just ugly... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
It was a fairly ugly fighter large ungainly and oddly proportioned.
![]() ![]() Finally the worlds ugliest example the the f-4 wall video YouTube - F4 Phantom Vs. Wall |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) |
|
Patron
|
Heh i never found the F4 to be that ugly :D
One of my fave aircraft actually, though it *is* definitely from the school of "brute force and ignorance" type flight. Pretty sure it's kill ratio improved with the top gun stuff when pilots learned to fly the energy fight with it rather than try and make it turn :D Back in it's day, it actually held a few time to climb and speed records for a while if i remember properly? Last edited by nutter : 03-11-2007 at 13:02 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) | |
|
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional |
Quote:
Missiles just weren't very good back then, and putting an energy fighter like the F-4 with missiles-only armament up against angles fighters like various MiGs with guns and missiles was asking for a hard lesson. Our other, more sensibly-armed fighters were doing better BECAUSE they carried guns. Once the F-4Ds started showing up with gun pods, and the F-4Es with the internal gun came on line...watch out, Charlie. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MiG 1.42 MFI “RAPTOR KILLER” : THE F-22 SLAYER | Mr-Vaastu | Military Aviation | 225 | 08-22-2007 15:12 PM |
| Heavy Warload Pics... | PubFather | Military Aviation | 161 | 10-11-2006 10:57 AM |
| Phantom of the Misty | lurker | Science & Tech | 0 | 02-01-2006 20:59 PM |
| Terror Reborn In Falluja Ruins | Shek | The War in Iraq | 25 | 12-23-2005 13:21 PM |
| Phantom F4 ejector seats | super727 | Military Aviation | 0 | 08-28-2005 07:45 AM |