2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-23-2003, 10:37 AM   #31 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,695
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Warthog: Flying the A-10 in the Gulf War by William L. Smallwood. I guess it's out of print but if I really wanted it, I'd order it on Alibris.com, used. It was a great read, loved every minute of it.
__________________
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.
~John Quincy Adams
TopHatter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 00:31 AM   #32 (permalink)
The Chap
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-18-04
Location: UK
Posts: 1,181
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TopHatter
Eh, pardon my ignorance, but who is Mr. Mudd? I like the way he talks
Ditto!
And how bloody stealthy is an A-10 by the way?
No attempt to do anything other than kill. They can see it comming? They generally run. Saves DU rounds as well. And resulting lawsuits from Vets.

Before any one gets cross, I know that was in poor taste.
__________________
Where's the bloody gin? An army marches on its liver, not its ruddy stomach.
The Chap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2004, 10:53 AM   #33 (permalink)
Se7eN
Regular
 
Se7eN's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-22-04
Posts: 44
The F-4 is still a might in the sky. Right now my dad, who retired AF after 24 years, is working as a civ contractor in South Korea helping train the SKAF with the F-4 and the AMG-142 missile system.

I asked him why they still use F-4's and he said with the new avionics they are still a very formidable aircraft.
Se7eN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2004, 05:14 AM   #34 (permalink)
Fury
Contributor
 
Join Date: 07-12-04
Posts: 327
If Im not terribly mistaken, the F-4 was used by argentinians during the Falkland war in 1982 I think. I once saw a document on TV where four argentinian F-4 phantoms disabled or destroyed two british battleships. The argentinian fighters were already in 1982 using outdated weapons and electronics still fighting against british battleships who had state of the art technology.
Fury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2004, 17:12 PM   #35 (permalink)
The Chap
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-18-04
Location: UK
Posts: 1,181
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fury
If Im not terribly mistaken, the F-4 was used by argentinians during the Falkland war in 1982 I think. I once saw a document on TV where four argentinian F-4 phantoms disabled or destroyed two british battleships. The argentinian fighters were already in 1982 using outdated weapons and electronics still fighting against british battleships who had state of the art technology.
No Phantoms. All french kit; various Mirage marques. Also there were no British battleships present because the Brits hadn't had any for a long time before that!
The Argentinians had one. For a brief while.
The Chap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 13:23 PM   #36 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,387
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Chap View Post
No Phantoms. All french kit; various Mirage marques. Also there were no British battleships present because the Brits hadn't had any for a long time before that!
The Argentinians had one. For a brief while.
You're BOTH wrong. He meant to say A-4, NOT F-4. But even A-4s are American-made.
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 13:56 PM   #37 (permalink)
bfng3569
Regular
 
Join Date: 10-12-06
Posts: 73
this thread is worthless with out pictures!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

bfng3569 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 14:07 PM   #38 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,330
Country:
One of my most favorite planes the F4.
__________________
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 14:07 PM   #39 (permalink)
omon
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
 
omon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Location: bk
Posts: 1,925
Country:
who are you calling ugly, f4?? i think f4 is the best looking fighter, only f22 beats it in looks, but that just me.
omon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 19:01 PM   #40 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,381
Country:
F-4 is one of the ugliest fighter ever to be mass produced. Its ugliness is only surpassed by the X-32 Monica.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 20:30 PM   #41 (permalink)
Jimmy
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-16-05
Posts: 931
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
F-4 is one of the ugliest fighter ever to be mass produced. Its ugliness is only surpassed by the X-32 Monica.
So ugly its gorgeous, you mean.

I loved watching them fly at Tyndall. It was mildly sad to know that there was a decent chance it would die over the Gulf of Mexico in the HUD of an Eagle, though.

Edit: VVV I meant the F-4.

Last edited by Jimmy : 03-09-2007 at 22:38 PM.
Jimmy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 21:38 PM   #42 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,381
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
So ugly its gorgeous, you mean.
No way. Monica was bad. Huge gaping mouth. Fat torso. Thin spindly legs. What the hell was Billy...I mean Boeing, thinking?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
I loved watching them fly at Tyndall. It was mildly sad to know that there was a decent chance it would die over the Gulf of Mexico in the HUD of an Eagle, though.
Oh you mean the Phantom. No, it was just ugly. It had droopy tail, bent wings, saggy nose, crooked pipes...etc.

But it sure did perform though. It was a fine plane. Just ugly...
gunnut is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2007, 21:45 PM   #43 (permalink)
Maxor
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-18-05
Posts: 325
It was a fairly ugly fighter large ungainly and oddly proportioned.





Finally the worlds ugliest example the the f-4 wall video YouTube - F4 Phantom Vs. Wall
Maxor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2007, 12:59 PM   #44 (permalink)
nutter
Patron
 
Join Date: 05-27-06
Posts: 187
Country:
Heh i never found the F4 to be that ugly :D

One of my fave aircraft actually, though it *is* definitely from the school of "brute force and ignorance" type flight. Pretty sure it's kill ratio improved with the top gun stuff when pilots learned to fly the energy fight with it rather than try and make it turn :D

Back in it's day, it actually held a few time to climb and speed records for a while if i remember properly?

Last edited by nutter : 03-11-2007 at 13:02 PM.
nutter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2007, 15:51 PM   #45 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,387
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by nutter View Post
Heh i never found the F4 to be that ugly :D

One of my fave aircraft actually, though it *is* definitely from the school of "brute force and ignorance" type flight. Pretty sure it's kill ratio improved with the top gun stuff when pilots learned to fly the energy fight with it rather than try and make it turn :D

Back in it's day, it actually held a few time to climb and speed records for a while if i remember properly?
Its kill ratio went up as a consequence of it getting a gun, as well as better air-to-air skills for its crews.

Missiles just weren't very good back then, and putting an energy fighter like the F-4 with missiles-only armament up against angles fighters like various MiGs with guns and missiles was asking for a hard lesson. Our other, more sensibly-armed fighters were doing better BECAUSE they carried guns.

Once the F-4Ds started showing up with gun pods, and the F-4Es with the internal gun came on line...watch out, Charlie.
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MiG 1.42 MFI “RAPTOR KILLER” : THE F-22 SLAYER Mr-Vaastu Military Aviation 225 08-22-2007 15:12 PM
Heavy Warload Pics... PubFather Military Aviation 161 10-11-2006 10:57 AM
Phantom of the Misty lurker Science & Tech 0 02-01-2006 20:59 PM
Terror Reborn In Falluja Ruins Shek The War in Iraq 25 12-23-2005 13:21 PM
Phantom F4 ejector seats super727 Military Aviation 0 08-28-2005 07:45 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:20 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8