LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With QuoteGood job Gunnut! I hadn't noticed that wangrui961 posted a shopped pic from sinodefence. Adobe launches another DDG, lol.Originally Posted by gunnut
Here's my question:
Oh come on!Here's my question:
Look at the flags, the lighting, the tug markings, mooring line and it's shadow, and everything in the water and the waterline and the background forward of the bow. This is the same picture cut down and photoshopped! Too easy, but maybe I don't understand the question.
Last edited by Sandman; 21 Sep 06, at 00:40.
Good job Gunnut! I hadn't noticed that wangrui961 posted a shopped pic from sinodefence. Adobe launches another DDG, lol.Here's my question:
Last edited by highsea; 21 Sep 06, at 00:43.
"We will go through our federal budget – page by page, line by line – eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way." -President Barack Obama 11/25/2008
The thread starter posted a picture of the Type 052c frigate. (is it a destroyer? I keep calling it frigate)
Highsea posted a picture of another Type 052c pulled off Sinodefense.
I noticed they are the same picture.
So we're asking why the different number?
The Colonel said "Adobe is the biggest arms manufacturer in China." And we just proved it again.
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
Thank you for the pictures wangrui961. Is Iran working with the PRC on stealth aircraft. One of the pictures "J -14 1" looks very similar to the Iranian stealth.
Also, nice pictures of the PLAN's aegis type destroyer "#170" & "171".
Adrian
we indeed made the enginesDont you guys know that according to a few search engines we are the Pinnacle of western debate forums as far as the west goes. And we mostly lean to the right as well.LMAO go figure
So they stream here in search of notorioty and being the wonderfully kind people we are we supply it.Good or Bad.hehehehehehehe
I think the internet is much developed,pealse search it in Google
I just wangt to tell you how the PLA is now,I don't want to debate
thank u
Lol, you're welcome wangrui961.
You make search engines too? Wow!
I have a suggestion though, I think the PLA would be much more powerful if China invested in some good graphic arts training for high school students. Also, you might want to stop using balloons for mobile missiles, something solid would look more realistic. Maybe bamboo?
I come in peace.
"We will go through our federal budget – page by page, line by line – eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way." -President Barack Obama 11/25/2008
The PLA would have so much more credibility if these internet kiddies would stop trying to BS so much.
If these BS is done on official orders, then the PLA has more to worry about than their lack of credibility.
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
Not that I've seen.
Chimo
lol...
Nabha Sparasham Deeptam
-Touch The Sky With Glory
Thank you, Sir.
I was sceptical, 2 launches in one year of a ship of that class, from the same yard seemed a little unbelievable.
"We will go through our federal budget – page by page, line by line – eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way." -President Barack Obama 11/25/2008
You don't even need to go that far. Just look at the pixilation distortion around the '171' where they've used the smear tool after they've pasted clean hull over the old number. Bloody amateurs.The thread starter posted a picture of the Type 052c frigate. (is it a destroyer? I keep calling it frigate)
Highsea posted a picture of another Type 052c pulled off Sinodefense.
I noticed they are the same picture.
So we're asking why the different number?
The Colonel said "Adobe is the biggest arms manufacturer in China." And we just proved it again.
Marketing is selling weapons.
They need money for killing machines so they make photos and then show it to goverment and party.
Sometimes(manytimes in China) it leak to press. Of course that year is ficional.
wangrui961you said 2010, no way maybe 2020.
It isnt easy to build stealth fighter. You guys have problems with licence production of Su-27, how do you expect to build F-22 competitor in two years?
P.S. that smaller stealth fighter (China F-35) is copy of Russian Vityaz 2000 prototype which fly in 2000. You guys only lower engine on that photo.
But dont underestimate China it is going forward very fast.
Now wait a second here, maybe we can make the US navy the 1000 ship fleet we allways wanted!!! 40 carriers, 460 Burke DDGs, and maybe we could photoshop a new supercruiser; a cross between a Kirov, Iowa, and Ticonderoga! LOL.
Two can play at that game.
Iowa armor, Kirov antiship systems and Ticonderoga air-defence.
Sound very bad.
P.S. instead of Sunburn Titan missile(6+Mach,400km range) full titanium it was even expencive for Soviet union which had 90% TI production.
But that ship would rock&roll.
Wangrui961, you'll have to forgive the members here at World Affairs Board.
They are accustomed to seeing picture after picture of PLA equipment that is fake, computer-generated, altered, airbrushed, Photoshopped, wishful thinking and just plain silly.
I'm sure you wouldn't post such pictures, would you?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Share this thread with friends: