2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Military Aviation
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-26-2006, 19:40 PM   #226 (permalink)
hello
Contributor
 
hello's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-31-05
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
Oh yes! I always assumed they lost the shark teeth when they dropped the camo paint.

Grey sucks.
The shark mouth suits the A-10 even better than it did the P-40 with its 30mm cannon.
hello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 04:21 AM   #227 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,867
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by sidishus View Post
In terms of loss per sortie it suffered the highest loss rate of USN aircraft, and Vigi crews made up nearly 10 per cent of the USN POW population.

http://www.bobjellison.com/RA5C_Vigilante4.htm

Eventually, the Vigilantes did go North, suffering the highest loss rate of any Naval aircraft in the war. In all, eighteen Vigilantes were lost in combat.


• 11 were lost to antiaircraft fire.
• 2 were shot down by SA-2 Guideline surface-to-air missiles (SAM's).
• 1 was lost to an Atoll missile fired from a MiG-21 fighter.
• 4 were lost for unknown reasons, over N. Vietnam.
• 1 other aircraft was lost for unknown reasons, not over N. Vietnam.
Why were the Vigis lost at such a high rate? You mentioned it looked more or less the same as other aircraft on radar. Was it the type of mission? Low speed (seemed unlikely as it was designed for high speed)? Low manuverability?
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 10:37 AM   #228 (permalink)
sidishus
Regular
 
Join Date: 05-27-06
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
Why were the Vigis lost at such a high rate? You mentioned it looked more or less the same as other aircraft on radar. Was it the type of mission? Low speed (seemed unlikely as it was designed for high speed)? Low manuverability?
http://www.bobjellison.com/RA5C_Vigilante3.htm

Another record is a sad, but proud, one. The RA-5C had the highest loss rate of any Navy aircraft during the Vietnam War. Twenty-three Vigilantes went down. The loss rate had nothing to do with the airplane itself but was the hazard of its primary mission; pre- and post-strike photography. Getting in before a major Alfa strike was relatively easy; there was an element of surprise and the Vietnamese gunners were waiting for the attack aircraft. It was getting the vital bomb damage assessment (BOA) photos that was risky. The smoke and dust from bombs took 10 minutes to clear, so the Vigilante would wait to come back over the target. This was also how long it took for the gunners to reload their weapons. The exact target was obvious, and the sky above would be filled with flak.
sidishus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 12:19 PM   #229 (permalink)
Shipwreck
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
 
Shipwreck's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-07-06
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 2,072
Country:
For all the patrioteers out there...

Attached Images
File Type: jpg Flag.jpg (171.3 KB, 95 views)
__________________
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called children of God" (Matthew 5:9)

Last edited by Shipwreck : 11-27-2006 at 13:01 PM.
Shipwreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 12:24 PM   #230 (permalink)
Shipwreck
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
 
Shipwreck's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-07-06
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 2,072
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
LCA is a Mary Ann. Gripen's a Ginger...
And here's a Fanny
Attached Images
File Type: jpg NakedFanny.jpg (144.3 KB, 95 views)
Shipwreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 12:32 PM   #231 (permalink)
Shipwreck
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
 
Shipwreck's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-07-06
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 2,072
Country:
Jaws...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Jaws1.jpg (130.0 KB, 94 views)
Shipwreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 23:52 PM   #232 (permalink)
Gun Grape
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
 
Gun Grape's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-12-05
Location: Panama City Fl
Posts: 2,698
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shipwreck View Post
Jaws...
I hate when civilian pilots plaster that on their planes.

It would have been much cooler in actual VMO markings.
Gun Grape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2006, 05:14 AM   #233 (permalink)
Shipwreck
Resident Mythbuster
Senior Contributor
 
Shipwreck's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-07-06
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 2,072
Country:
More jaws...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Jaws2.jpg (223.8 KB, 75 views)
File Type: jpg Jaws3.jpg (253.6 KB, 74 views)
Shipwreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 18:45 PM   #234 (permalink)
kkfan
New Member
 
Join Date: 12-01-06
Posts: 4
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by STIG View Post


It was supposed to replace the F14. Too bad the program was cancelled.
yah..that plane would've owned...and people would've joined the navy to fly that, now everyone's gonna join the air force for the F/A-22 -.-
kkfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 19:44 PM   #235 (permalink)
robert
New Member
 
Join Date: 11-30-06
Posts: 11
Country:
A few older planes with very nice lines...

Beech 17



Kawasaki Ki-61 (yes, this a model, but it shows off the lines)



Macchi 202/205 series



Heston Racer



...and the jet with the nicest lines. Even better looking in raspberry ripple, but I couldn't find a shot


Last edited by robert : 12-01-2006 at 19:47 PM.
robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Favorite Naval Book(s) RAL's_pal? Naval Forces 62 02-09-2007 04:46 AM
Pakistan - Military Update Neo South Asian Defense Topics 205 02-03-2007 20:44 PM
Pakistan may buy US, Chinese and Soviet planes Neo South Asian Defense Topics 28 05-01-2006 12:06 PM
Pakistan receives two F-16s fighter planes: official JG73 Military Aviation 0 12-18-2005 09:11 AM
PAF chief for purchase of F-16 planes now Ray South Asian Defense Topics 5 11-27-2005 14:26 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8